Pah, I frkin give up. Not very intelligent are you? (is the kindest way of putting it in fear of one certain mod's wrath)Where did i say i don`t engage in combat? This is part of Captain fighting along your soldiers.
Pah, I frkin give up. Not very intelligent are you? (is the kindest way of putting it in fear of one certain mod's wrath)Where did i say i don`t engage in combat? This is part of Captain fighting along your soldiers.
Thats fine, your input was not valuable however..Pah, I frkin give up...
The **** do I care in providing valuable arguments to someone who's very clearly having difficulties understanding them and makes me repeat myself in every response.Thats fine, your input was not valuable however..
Byyyeeee...The **** do I care in providing valuable arguments to someone who's very clearly having difficulties understanding them and makes me repeat myself in every response.
I will let you know i was in the age of empires 2 DE beta sirlol, i know what AoE is, i played it when it was released, lol...
Very nice, i like playing all Alpha, Beta tests as well...I will let you know i was in the age of empires 2 DE beta sir
- An atrocious amount of glitches. Animation skipping when you attack from getting up (knocked down), animation of x swing on your screen shows as a different animation on the enemy screen. For example countless times I have attacked from my right, readying a right to left strike and my character will do some dumb **** and attack from another angle DESPITE the animation showing that I am readying an attack from another angle. Archery through shields, glitchable huts, ghostshots, throwing not registering. Swing ready/kick/slash glitch, the most cheesy way to open an opponent, an abusable glitch.
- Stances, shield bash. The most pathetic excuse to add pseudo-depth in the game. Shield bash is the most annoying, ez mode interrupt ever in existence and it should be removed totally. Stances add nothing but clunkiness in the game and furtherly slow down the already slow the nature game to a yawnfest.
- Cavalry. Cavalry is the class that carries bad players effectively removing any skill needed to get a kill in the game. It has been broken since 2019 and it's still in a pathetic state with top damage, top utility, top interruption and top global presence. They do not knockdown teammates either. The sound cues are bad for them aswell. It's a literal tank.
- Delays, slowed down gameplay. The most stupid decision ever made by TW, to appeal to the realistic kids who think realism is good for a game. I cannot play infantry combat over 10 seconds with drooling from boredom in this hit/block/hit/block sequence. Infantry has been in a pathetic state since last year. They move as slow as chickens and they are BORING to play. It takes about 5 years to move from one point of the map to another. I instantly quit any empire matches due to how slow the infantry moves.
- Class system. The biggest abomination I have ever seen out in any video game I have played in multiplayer. Bad design, limited, restricting, bad looking when it comes to aesthetics, 80% of perks are bad choices, unviable classes because some dev thought it was actually a good idea in a skill-based game to feature both 0 armored and fully armored warriors. I have never ever seen a worse design choice than this pile of **** we call classes of bannerlord.
- Pros ignored. A smart company hires pros to design the game together. They do not get some random napoleonic wars kid to design the whole game and define native. You do not ignore the core playerbase. Because then you have less than 50 people on multiplayer, just like you have now.
- Patches are slow as ****. Patching a multiplayer game requires fast acting and meaningful changes. Instead we wait for 20+ days for a ****ing map rework that does not work anyway.
Rage mode off. If you decide to stay, good luck and I hope the future is brighter because we do live in the dark age of MnB franchise regarding multiplayer. I will still look on forums. I will be playing Valorant, because it scratches the same itch warband did (and CSGO). Fast paced combat, few hits to kill, meaningful positioning and movement and fluid as hell.
That's a paradox.550 hours of mostly solo Skirmish... NOWHERE, near any acceptable state for a game that costs 50 euros.
That's a paradox.
NIN3 actually plays them its just rude, but the corridor and tree camera issues exist (doubt its in his hands to change them)- It's very evident that whoever designs maps do not play mount and blade. If he did, he would already know about the camera issues, the corridor fighting and the plethora of problems that follow closed quarter combat.
NIN3 actually plays them its just rude, but the corridor and tree camera issues exist (doubt its in his hands to change them)
mp is just dead, thats no surprise if they put 0 resources into it
maybe because it has an actual competitive scene that has been around for decades?Everybody knows what AoE is, I am simply giving context to the fact that it has more population than an action game.
If ur saying warband Nw has no competitive scene you’re dearly wrong lolmaybe because it has an actual competitive scene that has been around for decades?
When does he say that?If ur saying warband Nw has no competitive scene you’re dearly wrong lol
If ur saying warband Nw has no competitive scene you’re dearly wrong lol
That's a paradox.
You just don't play something 550h and then say it's not the worth of 50€, no matter how flawed it is. I actually didn't read the rest of OP, because that alone statement is a complete paradox, so I don't know what was his reasoning.You will do something you don't like doing, as long as it gives a positive feedback. Lot's of people smoke, it makes them feel good. Doesn't make it any less deadly, and doesn't mean they don't know its any less deadly.
I'm not saying Bannerlord is as bad as a known carcinogen, nor that it is equally addictive. But you can play something because it makes you feel good, or brings back nostalgia, but still think it is a flawed product. This is hardly a paradox.
You just don't play something 550h and then say it's not the worth of 50€, no matter how flawed it is. I actually didn't read the rest of OP, because that alone statement is a complete paradox, so I don't know what was his reasoning.
And it probably will get better, and then he will play it even more, on top of the 550 hours, and don't have to pay a dime. And the statement will get even more ridiculous. A lot of threads in this forum are plagued with this kind of irrational, attention seeking attitude. If he would've phrased it reasonably maybe his thoughts would've gotten across better.Nothing else to do in a global pandemic, no other large releases in terms of games, playing towards a 750 win badge in the vain hope that the game will be enjoyable by the time you do reach it... it’s hardly a paradox. Look past his first sentence and you’ll see why he hates the game and wants it to be better.