Milver
I must notice that a mounted soldier has no any advantage when confronting a foot soldier.
I was always forced to dismount in order to successfully join melee combat, because when mounted it seems that a soldier is more vulnerable and can't use the sword effectively.
This is something that I really don't like, because it is known that a mounted soldier has serious advantage against a foot warrior. Swinging a sword when mounted always presents grave danger for the foot warrior because his head is exposed to blows from the warrior which has advantage in height, and hence can deliver much power to each blow concentrating on opponents head. Therefore, a foot warrior must raise the shield to protect. On contrary, only mounted warrior's legs are directy exposed to blows.
I experienced so much time a disasterous results when engaing one or to enemy soldiers using a horse a shield and a sword. It is pretty ineffective to deliver sword blows from the horse. So the foot soldier has an advantage in Mount&Blade game.
And when fighting in arena, I know that mounted knights whether they have a lance or a sword, they'll be an easy target (taking into account that you are footman, and that a knight using a lance is controlled by computer).
And this is really not logical, and is contrary to historical facts.
Though, when mounted and charging with a lance then there is a kind of advantage for the mounted warrior, and I applaud to that.
What about your opinions, experiences?
I was always forced to dismount in order to successfully join melee combat, because when mounted it seems that a soldier is more vulnerable and can't use the sword effectively.
This is something that I really don't like, because it is known that a mounted soldier has serious advantage against a foot warrior. Swinging a sword when mounted always presents grave danger for the foot warrior because his head is exposed to blows from the warrior which has advantage in height, and hence can deliver much power to each blow concentrating on opponents head. Therefore, a foot warrior must raise the shield to protect. On contrary, only mounted warrior's legs are directy exposed to blows.
I experienced so much time a disasterous results when engaing one or to enemy soldiers using a horse a shield and a sword. It is pretty ineffective to deliver sword blows from the horse. So the foot soldier has an advantage in Mount&Blade game.
And when fighting in arena, I know that mounted knights whether they have a lance or a sword, they'll be an easy target (taking into account that you are footman, and that a knight using a lance is controlled by computer).
And this is really not logical, and is contrary to historical facts.
Though, when mounted and charging with a lance then there is a kind of advantage for the mounted warrior, and I applaud to that.
What about your opinions, experiences?