-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
31 March and 50 Bucks what do you think?
- Thread starter Horatius
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Eternal expectations, promises, but what is the result? Early access?
TW could not stand under strong pressure of
Even if true, how is that deceiving?
You got the point, but you act like you didn't. You know about what kind of "fans" I am talking about.
Yeah well you can't hate an artist because his art took so long. And in my book, MB is an art. An art which is very hard to make stable with more advanced gameplay. Because it is a simulation game. Not some level based game.
Everyone here on the forums wants the game to succeed. No one ever said they wanted to see it fail
sure
Revverie
This is what the Joker is doing to our kids, please say your words outloud and hear how ridiculous this sounds. Mount and Blade became such a drug all these dudes complaining overdose and now they're completely mad about it, it's either the game isn't like they daydreamt it or it's because it's coming 10 days later of what they expected it to be. Deceived how? Please elaborate on that so it becomes more ridiculous.
TW hasn't got the worst fans they have literal drug addicts
Last edited:
I couldn't explain it better
If you read what I said at the end I said I would happily pay £30 early access or not but I think it's a bit too much at £40 and I know its only £10 more but I wouldn't pay £40 even if it was a full game I just think that price is taking the piss a bit and also a lot of things can happen in a year.
I took a gamble and bought Mount&Blade as EA back in like 2006 or something and its one of the best gaming buys I've ever made. I will get this game, play it on my brother's computer (because my can't run it on recommended and I'm poor ) and won't look back for a second. This game with its mods and stuff will likely keep me going for a decade. Easily worth scrapping together 50 bucks for it.
) and won't look back for a second. This game with its mods and stuff will likely keep me going for a decade. Easily worth scrapping together 50 bucks for it.
There is one question in my mind... am i going to be able to do 500vs500 battles with a i7-9750 and gtx1650
Ready and willing
Revverie
Yes, and your interpretation was this
It is something to value, but they shouldnt count as the only thing when you're about to buy a game, if you're only looking around for 90 hour games you will miss a lot of great other games just because of that criteria
My personal opinion, which you’re free to disagree with
now you change to the "only thing" ... Obviously the hours are not the only thing, they are the FUN time, if it wasn't fun you wouldn't play all those hours.
The price is determined by the personal assessment you make of what you are going to buy, if your valuation is consistent with that, you buy, if it isn't, you don't buy it.
So if you value the fun time it will give you, a higher price will be justified.
So long as I don't have to pay for content updates. I don't want to pay for DLC that is actually patches in what was promised in original product. Though I gotta admit I thought they were going to delay from a march release. 
YourNakedDad
Recruit
Its not like you only payiny for the early access game you getting the full game eventually besides there is no way they can make the EA game 30 dollars and when the full game releases ask you for need 20 dollar more it dosent make any sense
I believe we are dealing with new-gen kids who never bought EA games on steam or non gamer people...you just explain them what it all about is, and they just keep coming with same questions...
Similar threads
- Poll
