"Classic", thank you . Brutus likes me!
So if pushed on this, you would provide facts/sources that show that the protests were more non-peaceful (in charachter?) and that the police response to said non-peaceful protestors was targeted and proportional in response (because that's the implication).That "entirely peaceful protest" could not be heard over the sounds of explosives thrown by the protesters. Get your facts straight before you post.
Get your facts straight before you post.
Because, of course, the protesters are going to be like, "we didn't do nuffin, just walking aalong." Neither side are a bunch of angels.Because of course the official Charlotte Police Twitter is going to be like "we're a bunch of assholes, and we would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling kids".
Using fireworks in a situation like that is a deliberate tactic to create an environment where eventual actual explosives or gunshots fade into the general similar noise. It's quite close to robbery with a credibly looking plastic gunTo clarify, explosives = fireworks. 2nd, majority of protests are characterized as lawful/peaceful.
Tactic by the protestors? But they didn't fire actual rounds. What do they get out of it?Using fireworks in a situation like that is a deliberate tactic to create an environment where eventual actual explosives or gunshots fade into the general similar noise. It's quite close to robbery with a credibly looking plastic gun
To clarify, from your perch high up in the Wonderland Mountains, you cannot know what explosives = ? .To clarify, explosives = fireworks. 2nd, majority of protests are characterized as lawful/peaceful.