this is amusingly predictable.
What's more amusingly predictable: you claiming a politician you don't like being a faschist or me saying that it's ridiculous?
There is just as many conspiracy theories coming from the left.
Also since when is rejecting science and modernism fascist? Fascists were quite into both.
And don't even mention the "disagreeing" part. Look at what you're doing. You're literally painting people you disagree with as not even normal human beings. Сompare the length at which the right and the left are willing to go to ostracize and even destroy the livelihoods of people with "wrong" political views in a quest to silence the opposition.
The populist narrative where classes are being manipulated to clash and certain political forces being blamed for all the problems is also a very left strategy.
I also don't remember Biden strongly denouncing the violent riots and promising to crack down on them. I think lionizing the violence is a thing on the left, if it is the right kind of violence.
Just as dismissing large swaths of the population. Didn't Biden say that black people who vote for Trump are not actually black?
The only bit here that makes sense is Trump being tough on illegal immigration. But that's not even a far right thing.
Of all the stuff in his post you pick this.
Yeah.. I picked the obvious fake news bit. Why is it strange?
You call yourself a "Veteran election watcher", but honestly I would be shocked if you can find any example of electoral fraud in any country which results in such a narrow margin.
2010 presidential election in Ukraine.
You can't expect media to report hearsay and amateur lawsuits only meant to harass and drag out time.
Why not. They reported the coup story. Which is also hearsay.
Just like many others which make the opponents look bad.
Y'all, I think that we are getting a bit sidetracked here, which plays right into Trump's diversionary tactics.
Sure. Me trying to bring a weighted opinion to your "two minutes hate" is how Trump plans to conquer the world.
@Weaver, let's focus on one thing please. Trump is unequivocally stating that he won the election and that there was a fraud. He is not flaunting the idea, he is not just asking for a recount (which would be fine and noone would have a problem with it). He is saying that there was a fraud, as if it was an indisputable fact.
Two questions:
1) Do you dispute my statement that that is what he is doing?
2) Assuming that you don't, and I don't think you will since that is one Twitter link away and there's literally screeshots of it in this thread, do you think that that is a reasonable stance?
Not really. Trump is not a reasonable man.
Still I'm curious to find out if there is evidence there was any tampering with mail in votes.
You should really expect this. When you make the election rely more on practices that are more susceptible to fraud, the chances fraud happens increase. And suspicion rises also.
That's exactly why they are changing their voting procedure in countries like Russia and Belarus. If we had mail in votes in Ukraine and the rules were as loose I'd bet you good money all the fraud would happen right there, that would be the weakest spot hands down. But since the US actually has a more or less functional checks and balances system I'm actually willing to trust the results of the investigation.