11th and 7th looking desperatly for help!

Users who are viewing this thread

Faewulf

Knight at Arms
We need an help to find an server that we could play the match on tonightas Valmys server is taken down...  :?

Asking for temporeary admin powers for the match.

About 40 slots!
 
Nodscouter said:
Ah ****, his server is down? I bet those Prussians bastards did it to escape the slaughtering today.

Aye,( :lol:) In worst case scenario i'll host on my own, I'll ask the other server owners for help.
 
Nodscouter said:
Ah ****, his server is down? I bet those Prussians bastards did it to escape the slaughtering today.

Did the swedes ever won a battle against Prussia? Don't think so... :P
 
socks said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fehrbellin

u mad sweden?
Landser said:
Nodscouter said:
Ah ****, his server is down? I bet those Prussians bastards did it to escape the slaughtering today.

Did the swedes ever won a battle against Prussia? Don't think so... :P

Now i'm just taking up space. But i thought that i should restore Swedens honour here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Narva_(1700)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Frisches_Haff
 
thought we should use battles we play on AOFI for argument, but if you want to play that game, Alrighty then!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tornow

 
Herr_Thomas said:
thought we should use battles we play on AOFI for argument, but if you want to play that game, Alrighty then!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tornow

There you see is pure swedish Bad"assness"
 
Faewulf said:
Herr_Thomas said:
thought we should use battles we play on AOFI for argument, but if you want to play that game, Alrighty then!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tornow

There you see is pure swedish Bad"assness"

Except the Swedish losses were 16.67% while the Prussian losses were only 13.33%.

:o
 
BattleOfValmy said:
Faewulf said:
Herr_Thomas said:
thought we should use battles we play on AOFI for argument, but if you want to play that game, Alrighty then!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tornow

There you see is pure swedish Bad"assness"

Except the Swedish losses were 16.67% while the Prussian losses were only 13.33%.

:o

Strength
6,000 600
Casualties and losses
800 100

Well See if the prussians were smart they could have executed them in a minute.
 
Faewulf said:
BattleOfValmy said:
Faewulf said:
Herr_Thomas said:
thought we should use battles we play on AOFI for argument, but if you want to play that game, Alrighty then!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tornow

There you see is pure swedish Bad"assness"

Except the Swedish losses were 16.67% while the Prussian losses were only 13.33%.

:o

Strength
6,000 600
Casualties and losses
800 100

Well See if the prussians were smart they could have executed them in a minute.

Sure the numbers were uneven, but percentages tell a better story than just raw numbers, tbqh.

As another example, in the America Civil War, the Union deployed a total of 2,100,000 men, and 360,000 men were killed in total.

The Confederates deployed a little over half of that number, 1,064,000 men, and they lost 260,000 men.

Now, while the numbers of deployed men for the Confederates was lower, they still lost 24.44% of their men, while the Union only lost 17.14% of theirs. And guess who won the war? :P

Addendum: If you would like to count the number of men killed or wounded, then for the Union it's 30.25% and for the Confederacy it's 37.31%.
 
But you're forgetting that there were far fewer Swedes than Prussians. It's rather impressive that despite being outnumbered 10:1 still inflicting quite some casualties on the enemy.
 
Nodscouter said:
But you're forgetting that there were far fewer Swedes than Prussians. It's rather impressive that despite being outnumbered 10:1 still inflicting quite some casualties on the enemy.

Percentages tell a better story than raw numbers! :P
 
Back
Top Bottom