It would've been easy to take out that viking on the bridge. That first spearman should've easily took him out.Bugman said:I thought it was quite good. Acting was a bit suspect, but otherwise a decent attempt to portray history.
I'll be watching part 2 anyway.
Tintin said:It would've been easy to take out that viking on the bridge. That first spearman should've easily took him out.Bugman said:I thought it was quite good. Acting was a bit suspect, but otherwise a decent attempt to portray history.
I'll be watching part 2 anyway.
Yeah i realise that but that guy who was playing him was really slow. I'm sure the guy back in 1066 was a really skilled fighter but that man could've been easily killed. They could've made the actor seem betterBugman said:Tintin said:It would've been easy to take out that viking on the bridge. That first spearman should've easily took him out.Bugman said:I thought it was quite good. Acting was a bit suspect, but otherwise a decent attempt to portray history.
I'll be watching part 2 anyway.
Aye, but thats what happened back in 1066.
Yeah. I think it was just a bunch of crappy re-enactorsBugman said:All the acting was painful.
The Vikings having that made dash run to the bridge was a tad silly to watch too.
i didn't say they were good re-enactors.James said:If they were good reenactors, they wouldn't act like morons, now would they?
That's what the big guy was meant to be doing but when he was defeated the saxons pushed them backRevilo said:I found it quite good, of course knowing roughly how it happend in real life helped a bit, one thing I dont understand though...
Why did the vikingr leave the bridge and back away? Surely it would've been easier to hold the bottleneck and buy more time for reinforcements...
Ah well, GO LEOFRIC!
Tintin said:That's what the big guy was meant to be doing but when he was defeated the saxons pushed them backRevilo said:I found it quite good, of course knowing roughly how it happend in real life helped a bit, one thing I dont understand though...
Why did the vikingr leave the bridge and back away? Surely it would've been easier to hold the bottleneck and buy more time for reinforcements...
Ah well, GO LEOFRIC!
Heres what happenedRevilo said:Tintin said:That's what the big guy was meant to be doing but when he was defeated the saxons pushed them backRevilo said:I found it quite good, of course knowing roughly how it happend in real life helped a bit, one thing I dont understand though...
Why did the vikingr leave the bridge and back away? Surely it would've been easier to hold the bottleneck and buy more time for reinforcements...
Ah well, GO LEOFRIC!
looked to me like the vikingr just backed away![]()
I taped ashes to ashes- gonna watch it tonight. The Devils Whore was quite good thoughtommylaw said:I was watching Ashes to Ashes, I caught a bit of it on 4+1, liked the Devil's Whore more though.
Tintin said:Heres what happenedRevilo said:Tintin said:That's what the big guy was meant to be doing but when he was defeated the saxons pushed them backRevilo said:I found it quite good, of course knowing roughly how it happend in real life helped a bit, one thing I dont understand though...
Why did the vikingr leave the bridge and back away? Surely it would've been easier to hold the bottleneck and buy more time for reinforcements...
Ah well, GO LEOFRIC!
looked to me like the vikingr just backed away![]()
-The vinkingr knew they were outnumbered and couldn't beat the saxons without reinforcements
-They chose a champion, in order to buy time for reinforcements, to stand against the saxons that came one by one
-The saxons killed him by means which i'm sure you know
-The vikingr had no idea when the reinforcements were to arrive and were forced back
-When reinforcements did arrrive most of the vikings were already dead and the reinforcements weren't in a fit state to fight
I taped ashes to ashes- gonna watch it tonight. The Devils Whore was quite good thoughtommylaw said:I was watching Ashes to Ashes, I caught a bit of it on 4+1, liked the Devil's Whore more though.
This pretty much.Bugman said:I thought it was quite good. Acting was a bit suspect, but otherwise a decent attempt to portray history.
I'll be watching part 2 anyway.