Search results for query: *

LOL dude, if the game gave you 900h, it did its job. The purpose of a game its to make you have fun, if you played that much its means you really enjoyed the game. If not you rly have a problem of empty life.
And of course, the game is far for be finished and im not happy of how the company manages the community and the info.

MArdA TaleWorlds said:

This issue is fixed but not yet pushed to the game.

Click to expand...

it's funny because it got autofixed in my game. Don´t really now why, I just continued playing the game, and at some point I open the quest tab and it works.

Playing without mods. If press quest menu button, the game crash, always..

Adrivan said:

so did the devs design one AI for the enemy army and a dumber AI for our own armies? that makes no sense

Click to expand...

I think its more like a bug. But you can test it. Just get a big army and get knocked so you can see your army start doing weird things.

Adrivan said:

Im confused, doesnt the enemy army use the exact same AI as your army? why would yours perform worse

Click to expand...

I think not, Its like they said, they get a spam of orders instead of just fighting. In fact, it will be better to fight brainless instead of non stop running and not fighting at all.

daxiapi777 said:

Conclusion ahead: stop hoping that Bannerlord will turn out to be even close to your dream game, wait for mods and be prepared to pay for some of the better ones.

Click to expand...

The biggest problem I see here is not that the game lacks in some sandbox features but some core mechanics like pathfinding in sieges are broken. That's the biggest problem I think. And as you said, Its been 9 months... and its not fixed yes...

Nice idea!, and easy to implement!

Yukmouth++ said:

Attacking a castle isn't easy enough guys ? you want to add yet another tool for offense that wins 99% of the time already ?

Click to expand...

Well, I think you are not seeing the big picture. If you have a bigger army than the garrison is normal that you can win the fight, its "real", however, the lacks in some features, "easy to implement" that can make it more realistic and challenging its the problem here (its what i think).

For example, they can implement a possibility of disease in both armies which is something normal in real sieges, (they can parameterize it using your leadership, tactics and medic skills + the army size + the time of siege). This can add a plus of difficult to novice generals or to castle without a proper governor. Another example is the possibility to send a companion to do a subterfuge action, like poison the well, burn the stables, burn the granary (if attacker), or burn the stable, burn the tents, assassinate general (if defender) (companion should need the roguery skill). These are just some ideas that only need some dialog and logic, not scenes, not nothing fancy, but they will give you more gameplay and will make skills more useful.