Search results for query: *

five bucks said:

Sword Sisters

Click to expand...

not agree with this ...

see this for ambush and scout maybe will help you here

Terco_Viejo said:

If anything here in The tactical way: beyond the melee cluster can help, take it. There is a lot of info buried after so long...concerning behaviour and test fieldwork.

Click to expand...

we hope that some exp dev can help if we did that
the battle will be great and take long time

goohu said:

keep dreaming bro. If it takes 1 year to get regular modes from warband , how long do you think it will take for open world? id say never.

Click to expand...

yes im dreaming
but just i want share my dream

Revverie said:

Yeah, its better to expect this kind of things from modders

Click to expand...

maybe they can do it
people make great work there so i hope they will can make one like this
and i see one make online chat on single player
so we hope

Revverie said:

I dont know if you're new to the Mount and Blade series, but there is a mod for Warband called Persistent World that was essentially a roleplay mode, you enter with your character in a map that had 4 factions each one with a castle and village (depending on the map) you can be a farmer, bandit, miner, soldier, looter, etc. There are quite a lot of works to do and you can siege castles, if 1 faction conquers it alls it wins. It's quite nice and entertaining even though they usually last 1 round that takes less than a day to end I think, if you're suggesting even a larger world yeah I could get into it, I think modders can get quite creative with this game as a base so I would keep my expectitatives quite high tbh.

Click to expand...

im talking about general and not personal mod for this game
so we need real, not light change

and i know that mod

Bloc said:

I didn't understand why footmen should die if they successfully stop the cavalry either by killing or making horse rear up?

Click to expand...

because the horse will be fast 60-70km
and if the footmen hit the horse and he is facing it
the horse will falls on him or stumble upon him or hit him hard

Bloc said:

I disagree. This also contradicts with what you said earlier. Not everyone is good at defending themselves. You can die with several swings in real life. There is nothing realistic about a random peasant blocking master swordsmen several times just to increase battle duration.

Click to expand...

im not sure i want to make it more long because i want that
no

but i see its easy and not realistic
just like you fight some child not men
and i read about history and see much wars

Bloc said:

Not sure what you mean here? Are you saying farmer vs warrior should take 40s while in-game it's 1s or other way around? If the latter, then how's that will make battles less "easy"? You can simply stab someone and that can kill him. 1 second of job can finish that opponent. Which basically what happens in the game if you are high level anyway. You can kill people - ones without armor - with single swing. Pretty accurate imo.

Click to expand...

i was mean
battle should take more longer

1vs1 in game even if he can kill him with single swing
but he should block some attack before he die

Bloc said:

Still, you are giving very vague examples. A spearman can indeed stop a Knight/horse. What is the point of having a spear if they follow your suggestion and just "get away"? You may not be able to stab it properly - which ends up you getting hit by them. Pretty normal and expected outcome. Best they can do is adding a multiplier for charges and if the charge is successful, low morale tier units can scatter around and run away. But there is literally no reason for spearman to run away from a cavalry.

Click to expand...

spear will kill horse yes
but when you can use it ? and how !
that what i mean
i see low soldier stand and facing knight/horse and not even have any fear and hit the horse and make it stop ? with out any damage on soldier ?
in real life this will kill him both the horse and the soldier this what i mean also the knight will be alive
so do you think the soldier will put himself in death danger for killing horse ?

Bloc said:

And I'm saying, this you already have. Your swing is related to your carried equipment and if you have shields, you are swinging less faster than usual. But saying that you are better than him without shield is not true. Because based on this "non movie" logic of yours, every battle in the history should be won by non-shielded units... I'm not going to bother to explain why this is not the truth.

Click to expand...

im with you with this

Bloc said:

This is something I cannot argue. Even looters are throwing like goddamn Legolas at the moment. This requires calibration for all units.

Click to expand...

yes and this make archers like a machine gun

and im sorry about my language

and also they can add or edit attack system and make it more realistic

sorry about my font
and thank you for you answer

what i mean was

not "morale" i already know about it
i mean the fight need to be more realistic
for example
if we take 2 player
farmer vs warrior this will end for warrior sure
but the fight will be take 20s-40s for ex
not 1s
and everyone can defends himself well, even if he dies, so what is required is to improve the combat system, as well as the defensive systems, speed of defense and repulsion
______________________________

about horse
i mean about it
if you was in war
would you stand facing a knight moving to you fast with spear ?? ? or you will try to avoid him better so as not to get hurt
even if you was have spear
this will make you protect yourself
so we see farmer with spear can kill knight easy and with no fear
also you can see the knights with horse like footman
___________________________________
not much and the shield have big space the it
so if you face someone have big shield and you with out shield you will be better then him and have much plan to kill him

___________________________________

also the arrow and throwing weapon is have high accuracy