Search results for query: *

I am having a similar problem. I am making a very simple mod that sort of just reskins Battania with vanilla armor pieces and while simply overwriting spnpccharacters manually works just fine, integrating the mod with vortex and bannerlords launcher is a bit of a pain and I dont know how to make it work.

I dont know what the submodule is supposed to look like and I am now getting a weird 'CustomGame' dependency that I did not put in the xml and I cannot launch the game with my mod on vortex.

Before this though, the mod like half-worked or something, where the units were a mishmash of ugly vanilla and my mod like split down the middle.

What do I do?

This is what my SubModule looks like atm, bit of a mess

<Module>
<Name value="Fresh Battania"/>
<Id value="FreshBattania"/>
<Version value="v1.0.0"/>
<SingleplayerModule value="true"/>
<MultiplayerModule value="false"/>
<DependedModules>
<DependedModule Id="Native" />
<DependedModule Id="SandBoxCore" />
<DependedModule Id="Sandbox" />
<DependedModule Id="StoryMode" />
</DependedModules>
<SubModules>
</SubModules>
<Xmls>
<XmlNode>
<XmlName id="NPCCharacters" path="spnpccharacters"/>
<IncludedGameTypes>
<GameType value = "Campaign"/>
<GameType value = "CampaignStoryMode"/>
<GameType value = "CustomBattle"/>
<GameType value = "Sandbox"/>
</IncludedGameTypes>
</XmlNode>
</Xmls>
</Module>

Click to expand...

^
It doesnt look flat like that in reality, there are spaces and **** between the lines

I just want to be able to make my own changes in spnpccharacters to overwrite the one in Bannerlord/Modules/Sandbox Core/ModuleData, which would be an easy affair in some other games where vortex just bloody backups the file somewhere and puts yours in instead

Help much appreciated

Honestly, I am happy with alot of the changes and improvements in this patch.

Its the potential elephant DLC that has got me worried. Game is unfinished and paid DLC is already on the table?

Old-Bull said:

If they were going to just get rid of Khuzait speed bonus why did they have Mexico spend months fixing snowballing?

I'm really interested in seeing if they're going to have to revert snowballing changes now that they got rid of super speed for Khuzait.

Click to expand...

I don't really think that there is a realistic workaround for it, the speed bonus is such a massive advantage..

Dabos37 said:

Well, maybe something has changed in the last mod releases. I tested this mod some months ago and this was the result:

Maybe something has changed after almost a year, but it looked like the mod's author liked see archers being OP, so I stopped to use that mod. I am going to give it a try again.

Click to expand...

Old version.

Archers are well balanced in RBM overall.

Northern Empire is the weakest Empire faction I would say. The AI also loves fighting over Epicrotea for some reason, so thats a pretty instant -1 city for them out the gate.

Because the player is on a different plain of existence & rules at all times.
Not even counting the cheats the AI gets.

Vanilla is unplayable after getting used to RBM.

Death2Tyrants said:

But Talesworld in their infinite wisdom has decided that minor factions are there to restore the balance.

That's why weaker factions get all the mercs.

It's just alot of poor decision making regarding steam rolling. Instead of fixing the root of the problem, i.e. Kuzait SPEED, they implement things like:

a. prisoners are all houdinis
b. wounded lords recover immediately
c. AI lords start with elite troops
d. AI lords don't need money

I'm sure there's alot more.

Click to expand...

People have also suggested that armies should break up and retreat more often.

There is clearly a recruitment bias toward factions that are down on their luck, which I dont have a problem with.

Swaydia sounds better, as does Harlayus over Harlus.

Sigaretovic said:

Look here is the solution people :

Start as a 50 year old, marry, have kids, put the game in fast forward, die and respawn as one your children. Now you have your siblings ?

Click to expand...

Takes too long. Game isnt compelling enough for these looooong campaigns.

I complained about 1:1 and it turned out to be a mod. 1:1 battle troop composition is not a native thing, it should be proportionate to the total troop ratio.

Philozoraptor said:

This is caused by RBM AI module, we gave advantage to the defenders (some 1 month ago).
It would be actually funny if TW did similiar feature at similiar time.

Click to expand...

Bruh.

That isnt a good feature.

Ok so it turns out that I have twice the tactics skill of anyone that I face yet the battle troop count is equal.