Search results for query: *

abc123456 said:

To be fair, python,Lisp and C were not designed for complex gameplay programming. Can you imagine writing gameplay code in Unreal Engine 4 with these languages? It would be a nightmare. C# is the right choice because it offers scalability and maintainability of complex code but has a much easier learning curve than C++. Out of all the object oriented programming languages out there that offers a balance of scalability and ease of use, C# strikes the right balance. I agree there might be more boilerplate for some cases compared to say Python, but you have to understand we need to cater for all kinds of projects large or small. Every language has its weaknesses and strengths and we can't please everyone for all cases. If you are making a small and simple mod, then C# is overkill but if you are making a complex overhaul, then C# is the way to go... or C++ or even Rust.

Click to expand...

ApexPredator said:

1st bold you bring up having no choice while also giving possible choices. Since Epic has been brought up here they are a great example of this. I choose not to use them because I don't like their business practices. Sure they have given away games for free that I would like but I still choose to not download their launcher and I can still buy those games on another platform. For their exclusives, I guess I won't play that game then, you always have a choice. You can use this same mentality for EA games. If you don't like EA don't buy an EA title, if publishers keep releasing crap, stop buying from them until they prove otherwise.

2nd bold, this is off base. How would this responsibility fall on the store? This is the responsibility of the devs first and the consumer second. If the dev doesn't hold their end of the agreement you as the consumer should not partake in their product.

Click to expand...

Wulfsdottir said:

Umm... they are categorized in Bannerlord as well.

Click to expand...

mylittletantan said:

... a bunch of nonsense...

Click to expand...

if (targetPropertyValue == null && property.GetValue((object) this.DefaultBrush.DefaultLayer) != null || targetPropertyValue != null && !targetPropertyValue.Equals(property.GetValue((object) this.DefaultBrush.DefaultLayer)) || property.Name == "Name")

Click to expand...

el_miguel42 said:

You guys must all have been playing different early access games to me. There are 2 types of "early access" games that are available these days. The first type is when a massive company like EA releases a game a couple of weeks early. The game is already completed and tbh its just a marketing gimmick. The second type is when the early access is designed in such a way to essentially beta test the game. The bannerlord early access release is obviously the latter, they also made it rather clear that this was the case beforehand.

Secondly, I dont think ive ever come across a game which allows modding and has an active modding userbase, where modders do NOT fix problems before the devs. Infact I would go so far as to say that the larger the company that is doing the release, generally (although this is anecdotal) the slower the rate of patches that are released. Games developed by very large companies which are moddable will frequently go through months and months with the simplest bugs not being patched. Hell you even get user fixes in games which are not meant to be modded before the devs put a fix out.

I have never bought an early access game where the volume of patches was similar to what taleworlds are pushing out (very small indie devs aside). Perhaps you'd prefer if they did what most big studios do, and basically do nothing for half a year and then drop one larger patch? You know what happens when that occurs? Player complain about not being part of the process and that decisions and balance are being done counter to what they suggest. Every single early access ive seen the playerbase complain about not getting enough information, and not seeing roadmaps. Just go and play another game, and in future dont buy stuff in early access. The amount of whinging and whining is so tedious.

Click to expand...

Bloc said:

Calling what I said "nonsense" without having any viable argument... that's the spirit kid. Well done!

Let's stop playing any game that is not centred around the Gulf War or Syrian war since we weren't alive in those times. Heck, perhaps entire WW1-WW2 didn't happen man, damn, who knows? We weren't alive at all. Perhaps Germans and Russians were just playing snowball. Sharing grenade shaped beers and having the time of their lives.

Perhaps you should just play Minecraft if you don't like historical/behavioural accuracy. I would advise you to read Herodotus or Machiavelli but apparently it's not in your skillset so I won't bother.

Click to expand...

Bloc said:

It is, actually, historically correct. Hence I personally don't think it's a bug. Even though I'm sure Taleworlds didn't do that intentionally.

For example, I think this can be also counted as a bug:

• When you charge your troops to an enemy, after a few seconds of a clash, some of them (a sometimes big portion of your army ) chases the already running away soldiers, even though the battle is far from being over and a few meters away there are lots of enemies still waiting for them to attack. This breaks your formation and makes you more exposed to remaining soldiers.

But this, also cannot be classified as bug because it is something happened quite often in history. So frequently that some historians say that Athenians won the Battle of Marathon because rookies/recruits -surprisingly- didn't chase the running away soldiers and kept their formation. And pushed back the enemy as a single block of force. But I'm pretty sure Taleworlds didn't consider this human-behavioural case specially.

Click to expand...

MatthiasK1 said:

Makes sense. Which mod are you using? I could not find it.

Click to expand...

kalarhan said:

raid a village?

do remember you are not the king, so starting wars by yourself is not a way to be popular in your faction ...

Click to expand...