Search results for query: *

"Finished", sure. Finished, no.

Maybe we shouldn't be able to turn 180°, but at least a few dozen degrees of first person freelook would be nice.

Sure, I'm all for it. Let us raze cities, and let them be slowly repopulated and built up over time.

Problem is that it would require a whole lot of scenery to work.

The balance will be upset every time new content is added. So screw balance for now; right now we need to get as much content in as fast as possible. Bugfixes yes, balancing efforts no.

What the hell do you expect to happen when your horse gets a medieval railroad spike through its skull?

If anything, spears and pikes are underpowered.

Late medieval crossbows definitely packed more punch than any type of bow, but those aren't the ones we're looking at in Bannerlord.

Agreed with OP.

Agreed with OP.

Nope. Everyone gets the same number of slots. If you want another, then let the AI have another as well.

I'm just hoping the developers have an eye on what the modders are doing, so that they might accelerate their own work by integrating the modders' work.

In my experience the best strategic way to minimize losses is to have the larger army, comprising mostly elite troops, and as much cavalry as possible, and to never engage an enemy army of similar or greater size. So how to fight huge battles? Make sure they're huge because of the high number of your own troops, and don't enter a fight that gives the enemy a fair chance.

Good post!

I also found the city orientations weird, with the only gate often pointing in completely nonsensical directions.

Simple improvement: Give us shift-click for executing an action up to ten times at once.

A stable world, so kingdoms actually persist for as long as I play and don't fall apart left and right with lords switching sides every week.

That would also be fine by me.

See profile picture.

It's a fair bit too abstract for a medieval setting, in-game it ends up looking simply like two diagonal stripes on most flags in the game - which makes it nicely simple and non-cluttering. The details really only show up when you actually get close to a flag in first person.

Tall character should have longer arms to compensate, no?

Earth Dragon said:

There is an issue with the AI first and foremost that needs to get fixed.

Secondly, cavalry should take twice as much food to upkeep.

Third, archers and skirmishers can still do a number of cavalry if used correctly.

Click to expand...

I once had the AI place all its ranged troops in the middle of a wide river, so my cavalry-heavy army couldn't charge them. That surprised me a bit - pretty sure it was a coincidence.

Shouldn't the legionary have javelins instead of a spear, anyways? They already have swords for close quarters, after all, and their short spear isn't really much for anti-cavalry work.