Search results for query: *

uçanbiblo said:

Hey, sorry for the inconvenience. Can you please let me know if the issue is persistent on the latest live version v1.2.8? If the issue is persistent, please let me know.

Click to expand...

1.2.9
Still ongoing. Consider smacking the QA people next time you see them, it's been almost half a year, it's unforgivable

MArdA TaleWorlds said:

I've been informed that when the player is the third party on the quest Caravan Ambush or when the player is not the faction leader on siege defences or the player is not the owner of the sieged settlement on defence the order of battle is disabled. It is intended, not a bug. Thank you for reporting.

Click to expand...

Clearly some sort of scripting error has taken place. The OOB screen is skipped every time the player is a third party, including field battles

uçanbiblo said:

Hey, forwarded the issue to the QA team for further inspection. Thank you for your time.

Click to expand...

Happened to me as well, here's some screenshots and additional info:

Still capable of building engines, but not able to launch assault

Reducing the enemy defences to rubble also doesn't work

You literally have to leave to make them commence the assault

uçanbiblo said:

Hey, this issue should be fixed. Can you please let me know if the issue is persistent.

Click to expand...

It's somewhat fixed. Higher tier parts are less likely to be repeated, Tier 1 parts, especially for those weapon categories where it's hard to unlock parts (2 handed axes are particularly terrible on that front) do that quite often.

Looking back, it seems to me that the basic, pre-unlocked parts of each class almost always "unlock" a second time, almost as if the game didn't count them in the blueprints initially. Pommels are particularly stubborn to go away, but it might just be that there are many similar ones at that tier.

MArdA TaleWorlds said:

We are aware of this bug. The work is still in progress for this issue.

Click to expand...

Thought it was a conscious choice, were you guys working on visible damage on shields during combat?

I don't see why they'd ever do this. Warband mods already tried this:
- Perisno has a full custom mercenary troop tree, relying on an obscure rating system to balance the equipment, as well as overpricing the recruits - Result: troops are either incredibly OP or you preserve your immersion
- Pendor has the Custom Knighthood Order, only two troops but overwhelmingly powerful, balanced by extreme scarcity and huge investments in both time and money - Result: basically extreme late game material

If you don't like being subservient to a kingdom, become a bandit king: intercept and destroy caravans, eventually build up numbers by forming armies with parties lead by your companions, becoming a roving horde destroying everything in its path

Duh_TaleWorlds said:

@MRay forgot to add

• Ability to assign companions to be formation members (not captains) in OOB

Click to expand...

OH MY GOOOOOOOOOD

HalfMetalJacket said:

So like my idea basically.

Click to expand...

I'd say the gauntlets need to be shinier, maybe the striped gauntlets instead?

I remember glaive weapons in mods like Gekokujo, they were very powerful but also very slow and hard to use, since you needed to hit people at with the narrow end of the blade to max out damage.

Glaives are the obvious offender here, but they are historically acceptable weapons. I think a good solution is confining them to 1 of 4 possible equipment sets, the others being armed with a mace, a saber and a lance. This would atleast nerf 75% of KGs on a field. Prolonging the glaive and making it ever so slower would also be a limited solution.
KGs also have excellent armour, and that needs to be nerfed. I guess TW thought that them not having a shield was by itself a nerf, but they're horse archers goddamnit.

The lore that is described in the Enyclopedia is all very interesting and cool: Charas the original capital that was abandoned and fell, the betrayal in Lageta, the harsh climate of Danustica... As a passionate Souls player I've grown to like hunting bits of lore, however hidden they may be, in order to gain as much knowledge about the setting as possible.

The thing about Bannerlord lore is that it cannot escape the veeeery small confines of text boxes in an encyclopedia, and the lines of dialogue in the main quest. The city scenes aren't used for environmental storytelling and you aren't rewarded anyway for seeking stories inside of them.
Charas, despite being the cradle of the Calradian Empire, shows no sign of its original architecture, same goes for Paravenos and really any city that has changed hands in its history (I don't mind the former Palaic cities having their cultural heritage erased, that could become a well told story of cultural g*nocide) shows no sign of its supposed original occupants. Let alone the possibility for exploration, quest variety is also a problem: the triggers for "issues" to pop up pay no heed to culture or settlement, you are never going to get Vlandian only issues or Khuzait only issues to flesh out the cultures, let alone Charas exclusive issues or Marunath exclusive issues.

I'm going to direct very faint praise for Battanian towns, since they really look like remnants of a once prosperous civilization, approaching its doom within 170 years. Though no context is given to these ruins beyond the "decline" narrative.

As a huge history buff myself, I think we should thread with caution when discussing the lore of a game like Bannerlord. The year is 1080 AD and yet the Roman faction is still going (not well, mind you, but alive still), as well as a Celtic faction (though on its last legs as well). How would these armies look like if they lived long enough to witness the advent of heavy cavalry and the decline of heavy infantry? It's alright to use history to have some standards for what you can expect, but we shouldn't take it too far. The Calradian empire looks like a declining Rome but it's not yet fully "Byzantinized" to me.

Sturgian Heavy spearmen are usually enough to fight off khans, but then again I've never been in a situation where roughly equal amounts of both faced each other. I bet it's 1 and half heavy spear for each khan with the terrain advantage

Goyyyio said:

Yeah, I just don't care about anything. I'm just here to argue, to have pointless arguments. Every single argument ever had in this forum is useless and will be useless

Click to expand...

Consider doing the following instead