Search results for query: *

Terco_Viejo said:

I just discovered these guys... They're without a bassist nor a vocalist yet and **** yeah they sound savage. Hope! 

Spoiler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuNyIXBkheY

Click to expand...

Terco_Viejo said:

Sepultura's Spanish Sons 

Click to expand...

Roccoflipside said:

I wouldn't mind something like how shooters will use q and e to allow you to peek around corners. The ability to "flick" your character's head left or right for as long as your holding the button might work. The main thing is to be able to see left/right without having to turn the whole character's body.

Click to expand...

BIGGER Kentucky James XXL said:

Warband is one of the few games with 'pure' first person where the body model doesn't change much. In most games, first person is just a camera with some detached arms in front of it, and if you look down you have no legs. In warband the only thing that happens in first person is that your head vanishes. The disadvantage is that it's hard to tell at a glance what you're holding or what attack you're doing so the UI needs to be expanded to accommodate it.

I think in bannerlord the best improvement would be to increase the fov and alter some of the animations to make them more obvious in first person, although that's probably too much to ask at this point.

Click to expand...

AmateurHetman said:

Spoiler

BIGGER Kentucky James XXL said:

Warband is one of the few games with 'pure' first person where the body model doesn't change much. In most games, first person is just a camera with some detached arms in front of it, and if you look down you have no legs. In warband the only thing that happens in first person is that your head vanishes. The disadvantage is that it's hard to tell at a glance what you're holding or what attack you're doing so the UI needs to be expanded to accommodate it.

I think in bannerlord the best improvement would be to increase the fov and alter some of the animations to make them more obvious in first person, although that's probably too much to ask at this point.

Click to expand...

There are the ui indicators that show attack and block direction, they are helpful for first person.

Click to expand...

Rabies said:

Do not look here said:

Not really sure what to make out of it, personally I think it obviously won't be graphic enough to satiate those wanting tortures and whatnot, while also being underused - if used at all - feature in usual gameplay, rather a gimmick for a one-off Vlad the Impaler kind of affair. We'll see.

Click to expand...

Personally, I don't see why the 'animation' couldn't be replaced by an actual scene that you take part in.

It's not as though you don't kill plenty of people in battle anyway, often more gruesomely, I expect. Just have the condemned man or woman in a scene with some soldiers, and allow the player to walk up to them and hit them with a weapon. And they fall over and die. I don't see the difference between doing that in a set-piece execution scene and doing it in a battle, in terms of Public Moral Outrage.If anything, it'd make the decision feel more powerful, rather than being trivialized into a series of menu-clicks.

You could have the option of giving the task to one of your minions, so you wouldn't have to do it yourself or watch every time if you didn't feel like it.

Click to expand...

Count Delinard said:

Some old pics from good times, back in the day before they removed this option for Warband

Spoiler

I believe it gives much more flavor and meaning to the battles after they finish, battlefields tell a story after the killing is done and you prowl around

Click to expand...

Age of Empires II: The Densetsu said:

[...]
They might as well add the option in for people that can handle it. Adding a large number option and putting "will heavily damage performance/stability" or something would be fine, people would then understand what they were getting into. Restricting the option entirely is a silly idea.

Click to expand...

DanAngleland said:

NPC99 said:

Great to see the same rented room auto-configured as a mill (on the left) and a tannery (on the right).

Click to expand...

I'm not a fan of that myself, though it is smart from an efficiency of development point of view since they don't have to recreate an entirely new scene for every single business. It makes everything seem less distinct. Less real. I suppose it is plausible that most real life industries on a similar scale of production to each other would find themselves in similar premises, but a mill is a bit different- there doesn't seem to be any form of great power to turn the grindstone, no watermill or windmill, not even an oxen or mule. Presumably, then, this is supposed to be done entirely by human labour, but I associate that more with village life- the women folk doing the work outside, maybe a few households banding together to make flour for their families- than with a mill creating flour on a comparatively large scale.

Click to expand...

Duh said:

PTWarrior said:

This forum is funny, people joke around with even worse and more offensive jokes than that one but only some get warnings.

Click to expand...

He got a mini-warning for his spoiler shenanigans. They, like quote pyramids, are not well liked.

Click to expand...

Edgar Allan Poe said:

PTWarrior said:

People here love to throw themselves from de 6th and they die, 15 is more than enough.

Click to expand...

See, that's a logical fallacy. Or, a paradoxTM, at the very least. Because, since it is a one-time gig, nobody knows if they love it or not. It's not like they're coming back to share their one of a kind experience. Anyway, don't suicide to death, random pre-teen kid, casually browsing this site. We do not, in fact, endorse suicide.

Click to expand...

crodeau said:

there are no skyscrapers (yet?) in the **** towns we live in. tallest buildings here have ~15 stories. is that enough?

Click to expand...