Search results for query: *

I'm curious why Waal Castle was renamed Verlorne Castle in the transition from 0.99 and 1.0

Michadr said:

This might help: https://perisno.fandom.com/wiki/Perisno_formulas

Click to expand...

Not that I can tell.. I don't see anything there referring to the player's honor level. In an earlier playthrough, I created a spreadsheet to keep track of "Determining whether lords will complain about other lords getting fiefs". At that time, it seems to me, when my honor was over 100, good natured and upstanding lords had default relationship to me of 30+. It's early days yet, but relationships don't seem to progressing in the same way now.
.

Has honor been nerfed in 0.99? I think it used to be that the default relationship with upstanding and good natured lord went up by one for each three points of honor that I obtained. Now in a new playthrough, my relationship seems to have only risen by one with 20 points of honor.

Outstanding!  Thanks for all that Persino has been and become over the years.  And Happy New Year!

Click on "Notes" at the bottom of the screen, then "Factions"

Crimsonmist said:

Sleeeves said:

For weapons that provide a "Bonus against shields", how much of a bonus is it?

Click to expand...

It will ingnore the resistance of the shield.

Click to expand...

Good to know.  Thanks.

For weapons that provide a "Bonus against shields", how much of a bonus is it? 

Double Aracanus?!

I founded my own kingdom and made Aracanus one of my vassals.  My kingdom got wiped out and Aracanus soon became lord another faction.  Time passes and I found my own kingdom once again.  I send an emissary asking Aracanus to join my kingdom and happily get a message back that he accepts my request.

But instead of returning as a lord, Aracanus returns to his long ago role of a companion, though he is now listed as Lord Aracanus.  There is no option to ask him if he'd like a fief. Disappointing, but OK.

A bit later I come across a party of my kingdom patrolling the countryside led by Aracanus! He has a band of 60+ Perisno troops and a few Arcane Defenders. When I talk with him I have the option of welcoming him back (as if he were a companion), or I can tell him I have no room in my party for him. 

This has persisted for a few in-game months now.  Could be worse.

Does high controversy keep lords, castles and towns of my faction from offering the option to transfer my troops to them?  I'm a vassal with a  lot of controversy from two recent stints as marshal.  Renown 5000+, honor 800+, controversy 85

Brew said:

Sleeeves said:

Do lame horses no longer heal?

Click to expand...

They do its all down to wound treatment skill and an element of randomness, try to only have 1 injured horse in your inventory at a time as I find when you have 2 it takes longer for both to heal.

Click to expand...

OK, thanks Brew.  Do you know if healing of my horse is affected by party wound treatment skill, or personal? Because my character has zero skill there.

Do lame horses no longer heal? 

Hawkwinter said:

I can always buy my honor back in Mccan. 

-Hawk

Click to expand...

How does one buy honor back in Maccan?

Leonion said:

What's your version of the mod?

Try 1.000000  134 4 0 31 2 144115188075857228 for the first case.
But the second one should be present in the last version...

Click to expand...

Yes, it is.

Supersoldier19 said:

I've having a script error lately. The script error hasn't shown anything  wrong with the game but it pops up every 3 seconds and it's quite annoying, please help me if you can.

The script error says:


SCRIPT ERROR ON OPCODE 2204: Invalid Party ID :4309015; LINE NO: 118:
At Simple trigger no:158
At Simple trigger no:158

Click to expand...

Leonion said:

Did you do anything unusual or did anything unusual happen right before this bug started to occur?

Try this:
1) In simple_triggers.txt in Perisno folder find 1.000000  133 4 0 31 2 144115188075857228 0 and increase 133 by 1 (simple mathematical addition).
2) Then find 5 0 2204 2 1224979098644774918 1224979098644774917 and insert this:
132 1 1224979098644774917
between 0 and 2204

Click to expand...

I'm having this error trigger, but cannot find either of the strings Leonion describes in the simple_triggers.txt file.  Any advice?

EDIT:  Ach, I was searching the wrong simple_triggers.txt  Even in the correct simple_triggers.txt file I wasn't able to find the first string, but I made the recommended insertion into the second string and the error no longer triggers. 

Not sure if this is a bug, though it seems likely.  If I stash my Household Guards in a fief, the constable will not allow me to acquire any additional Household Guards.  Once they're back in my army, I can once again acquire more of them.

halt317 said:

Furthermore, I took back all the towns that the Zann took, so all they have last is Zann Fort. But since all this happened, all the Zann lords are stuffed in the fort, and apparently have bought an ABSURD amount of spearhead escorts. You can't take it over. At all. There have to be 4000 at least. What the **** do i do?

Click to expand...

Just like eating an elephant, you take one bite at a time.  Duck and dodge and lure a spearhead escort to follow you until they are separated from others then attack.  Rinse, repeat.  If you're marshal, you can handle bigger groups but it's still the same basic principle.

Porterhoused said:

For Melee:
Its complex, but basically the ability to withstand 130 piercing damage strike combined with how much dps you do to a target with 70 armor rating.  I wanted the rating to be how effective the units were at killing above average opponents, since anything can wipe the floor with fodder.

For ranged:
It is primarily ranged dps vs 70 AR target, with a small amount of defense and melee.  Unfortunately I do not know how ranged armor piercing works so this was left out.

Each unit gets a rating for range and melee and the max of the 2 is the units final rating. 

There is no differentiation in mounted vs foot.  You could assume they are the dismounted ratings in some way.

I wish I could figure out a way to test 100v100 troop fights.

Click to expand...

Seems a reasonable methodology to rate troops, especially for siege effectiveness.  It probably underrates the effectiveness of mounted troops in field battles.  And the situational flexibility of Hired Mercenary and Household troops gives them added value over other troop types as well.

The logistics of doing 100v100 fights for a matrix of troops like this would be daunting, and no guarantee that the results would be more reliable.

How did you assess the rating for each troop type?

Darknightaky said:

Leonion said:

Lights are fire arrows.
Sort of.
You can disable them in mod settings if you wish.

Click to expand...

those fire arrows needs an update
its not really accurate

Click to expand...

Like Leonion said, if you dislike them, disable them.