搜索结果: *

Mikal Manfriedson 说:

Well...isn't that just displaying the random or coded number that results in +400 gold per day and no matter what our caravan has sold or even visited a town? I wonder, how the ecomony in Bannerlord really works.
And what good is info, if I cannot use it? Reading a menu does not make you full.

点击展开...

TheShermanator 说:

All of these ideas sound super cool, and I’d love to see them implemented someday.

A much simpler fix, though, might just be a visible kingdom to kingdom relations system like the current interpersonal-100 to +100 relations score system. Then, likelihood to declare war or sue for peace would come from a formula factoring in kingdom relations, relative strength, casualties inflicted, and time elapsed since last change in war state.

Well, anyway, off to go start some s*** with the Aserai by beating up on some random peasants. ?

点击展开...

failedmusician 说:

@ both. It was my understanding this conversation was relatively new, and that this was a forum for suggestions.

I'll reduce archd's entire comment to "Trying to keep the game simple", because when TW decided to create Bannerlord they said to themselves, "Lets give some guys some bows, some guys some armor and we'll just keep it real simple."

I'm sure that when developers said "Hey let's listen to what players think about how we should implement a Co-op Campaign", the answer they were looking for would be, "It's a problem for future TW developers."

It seems to me that the co-op play archd describes already exists in quick battles, except for not being able to use personal heros, and play for the same stakes as in the campaign. While it may be fun to join in to gameplay at all the most exciting moments, it won't do anything for the evolution of overall gameplay(which is what I imagine developers are looking for in these forums).

How are you going to call it Co-op, when you're asking the second player to just wait on stand-by for a battle to maybe happen? Finding a fluid game platform for a campaign that can support single or multiplayer and switching back and forth would be like the most epically complex MMORPG but with the smooth plug and play ability that Nintendo Switch was supposed to have.

点击展开...

Bannerman Man 说:

The game already more or less works this way. The dialog system works on a series of weighted "conversation tags." Each line of dialog fits into a category (e.g. greetings), and has a set of associated tags. You can see some examples of this in the comment_strings.xml or voice_strings.xml files. The game checks to see if each tag associated with the line of dialog applies to the given situation, and adds the "weight" value of the tag to the dialog "score" if the conditions are met. The line of dialog from a particular category that has the highest score is the one that the npc speaks. If two lines of dialog have the same score, the one higher up on the list takes presidence. Here's a list of the various conversation tags:

隐藏: Conversation Tags

Here are some examples of the requirements for the tags to apply:

• PlayerIsFamous: the player must be above 50 renown (low bar, I know).
• FriendlyRelationship: either a set of both npc and player traits need to be "compatible" and relations need to be above 5, OR just relations above 20.
• PlayerIsLiege: the player must be the ruler of the npc's faction.
• AttractedToPlayer: must be opposite gender, not at war, neither player nor npc married, and the npc must be physically "attracted" to the player.
• PlayerIsAllied: the factions of the npc and player must be in an alliance (hm... I wonder if that implies something).
• Sexist: the npc must not be in a clan that has a female party leader and must have a particular combination of the valor, mercy, generosity, and calculating traits.

The game also searches through the list of event log entries, and bases certain comments on the type of event and the 'importance' of it. You can see that after you take a fief for instance; nearly every lord will mention it the next time you see them.

The dialog system is really versatile, and you can add your own dialog simply by inserting it into one of the xml files and giving it various tags and weights.

隐藏

There's actually a pretty large dialog tree for villagers and townsfolk that's based on a variety of conditions. There are at least 60+ distinct lines of dialog that villagers/townsfolk can say depending on which conditions are met, and there are 10-15 different condition types (such as seasons, prosperity level, traits, recent events, etc.).

Very few of the conditions directly rely on the player character though, unless they are a settlement owner or faction ruler. So maybe they could add a few of those in. Comments on equipment would be cool.

Lords and notables already have personality types that affect dialog. There are 4 different "personas" in the game, which are Curt, Ironic, Earnest, and Softspoken. You can see each lord's persona by looking at the "voice" variable in the lords.xml file. Their character traits also impact dialog lines given, so taken in conjunction with the personas, there are probably few lords that share the exact same dialog trees. However, they aren't going to write unique dialog for each individual lord; that's just not feasible with how many different situations there are in the game. Lords also have 1 of 3 political ideologies which affects which policies they vote for and their willingness to defect, as well as some other minor things.

All of that said, there's always room for more dialog, and I'm sure they will continue to pepper it in over time.

Edit: Also, it's almost a given that there are bugs within the conversation system, and that some dialogs might not appear because their conditions are rarely/never met. I found two bugs just while looking into the mechanic.

点击展开...