搜索结果: *

Ling* 说:

No, I did not say that. What I said was "I would also be in favor of restricting Captain respawns to 1-3 lives". I am however more in favor of implementing a leash system as I believe it would still allow more freedom of movement for the captain (the exact length of the leash has yet to be specified, it could be 20 feet, it could be 100 feet), but the ultimate result would be that you cannot simply park your troops somewhere and ride off alone. Limited respawns are just an alternate suggestion that achieve a similar functionality albeit in a different way.

You are entitled to your opinion, but It's hard to take you seriously when your gameplay consists of parking your units in the corner and then riding off alone to kill enemy Ai. I don't really understand why you don't simply go play skirmish if this is how you want to play?

点击展开...

Ling* 说:

I'm not the first one to come up with these suggestions, veteran players have been suggesting these very same things for a long time now, including former SkBr player @Brandis. who is quite experienced in playing in the competitive community.
The goal is not to make it an even playing field at all, its to encourage a commander playstyle where people control their troops and the focus is on unit control similar to battles in the singleplayer campaign, only instead of an Ai commander the commanders are players. This is what the developers have in mind for captain mode and not the skirmish with extra lives that it currently is.
I have no doubts that rambo can be dealt with, this is not the issue at all. The issue is that rambo promotes the wrong type of playstyle that is too focused on player combat instead of being a commander of troops like it should be.
But don't just take my word for it:

隐藏

点击展开...

Sigaretovic 说:

I have offer for you. Go play a game mode where you only control 1 unit and where your amount of respawns are less abundant.

点击展开...

Callum 说:

Unfortunately, we can't really police the use of the votekick, and to be honest, I can't blame them for kicking you from the game for ramboing. The game mode is about leading a formation and everything you are doing there goes against that. However, I can't blame you for doing that either because the game encourages it in a way right now.

With that being said, we will continue to refine Captain mode with the aim of eliminating the causes that lead to players using other features that are there more as a last resort.

点击展开...

Kripaz 说:

@Mexican Jesus I really don't get it what you are trying to achieve with these challenges. Actually I'm not even sure what you are trying to argue. I understand you, you tried to come in aid of your gang clan member, when he wasn't getting the responses he wished. It kinda backfired when you showed how egoistic you are, so it's hard to take you seriously anymore.

点击展开...

The Sign of 33 说:

And this is why Captain solo queue should have been separated from the group queue ages ago folks. Taleworlds is coming up with a bad excuse that "there's no playerbase to support it" but this right here is why it's required and I know your clan, you guys queue aganist randoms and play it like it's a clan tournament match, ramboing with inf and cav alike until the last moment of the round, often trashtalking the other team. Believe me you would be doing people a favor by kicking them so they would be spared the cringe.

点击展开...

Moton 说:

You literally came here to seek acceptance and approval. Not to discuss and learn wich is sad. Go and play singleplayer my dude/dudette.

点击展开...

Kripaz 说:

Just a fair warning: Don't be surprised if you and your pals get banned for abusing kick system.

Their reason for kick was very simple and justified: Delaying

点击展开...

Sigaretovic 说:

Like you had no idea that this playing style (making other people wait until all your live are fone) is socially unacceptable?

Please.... Even TW devs said this is not the way captain is intended, and thats exactly why this sort of kicking is justified.

点击展开...