搜索结果: *

Playing on 1.1.4 and it´s STILL happening.

Launched the attack and by that time had a full set of each, ballista (active), onager and trebuchets (in reserve). In the setup i could only change between the ballistae or NOTHING.

saittam 说:

I did not try siege battle. Only a field battle. A caravan ambush if i remember correct.

点击展开...

Caravan ambushes had never problems in the above mentioned way. Theres no second or third battle following the first encounter.

VVL99 说:

Scene Selection

This mod lets you choose which scene to use in battle.

www.nexusmods.com

点击展开...

This mod was out of date long ago.

piton8888 说:

ok, so it seems bug has been patched - leadership or roguery gains from the first phase is now retained

but its strange there is no mention of it in patch notes and this ticket is still "in progress"

点击展开...

We are not talking about xp-gain for heroes but for troops.

Had this a few minutes ago... 4 guys sit in that "bunker" and my whole army tried to reach them.

After pulling my men away from the site and after relocating myself several times, I was able to snipe them with my noble bow one by one.

VVL99 说:

[...]

I like the game and I want it to develop, but it is frozen and standing still.
===
Added 22 questions.

点击展开...

As a matter of fact, it´s even moving backwards, as old and formerly resolved bugs are back in game or former workarounds don´t work anymore.

In older patches for example there was some kind of random "map pool". When you managed to corner an enemy troop in a decently looking position on the world map (which was AND is tricky enough), lets say on plain terrain, it happened AND happens that the game decided to throw your troops right on the forrest moon of Endor.
The workaround was, to repeatedly retrieve from battle and reattack, each time getting a different map out of a small pool, until the game gave you a map that matched your preferences.
NOW, there is no "map pool" anymore. You can retrieve and reattack as long as you want, you will allways get the same stupid NONMATCHING map (despite the proposition of TW, that battlemaps should meanwhile apply to the surrounding terrain on the campaign map) and you have to take it or leave it.

Same problem in sieges, when the last defenders retreat to keep. Troop xp from the whole siege itself is lost, only the xp from the fight in the keep counts.

BY THE WAY :

Could someone PLEASE move the "solved" issues (most of them refering to bugs from 2020 from versions that don´t even exist anymore!) toward the "resolved" sub-forum?
I had to go forward to page 30 (!) to find this current issue.

Ananda_The_Destroyer 说:

That's a good question. I might guess it gets averaged together for each group in battle, but it's just as likely it's just ignored completely and only your own moral matters for you own forces and AI enemy just uses some default. No idea what the truth is, but moral is pretty much useless anyways, other then I suppose something for the player to be annoyed by occasionally.

点击展开...

Some skills are depending on (high <-- whatever "high" means) morale. Formerly you could at least check your other clan parties morale (and then get angry, because it was allways somewhere around 49/100 and hardly went higher), but now I have no clue at all.

Morale HAS an effect on how soon or late during a battle troops start to flee, thats for sure.

Basically it´s a new source for bugs!

Formerly you could for example transfer your companions over the whole map in no time by making them governour in one of your fiefs and right afterwards let them form a new party from there on. Now, when you remove them from the governor-post they become fugitive. That status isn´t shown in the clan members tab, but it´s shown in the encyclopedia AND it´s shown in the clan parties tab. When you try to build a new party with your former governor as party leader, he/she is greyed out and the mouseover info says he/she is fugitive and will become available after some time. Reason for becoming fugitive? I don´t have a f*cking clue!

I really don´t know what they do with their prisoners since full release. Around patch 1.7 somewhat I could level my clan members in roguery when I transfered my prisoners to their party via the "let me inspect your troops" dialogue. When they entered a town shorty after that, they sold their prisoners right away and made some levels in roguery.
Now they seem to transmute their prisoners into thin air or something like that, because the game gives you no feedback at all about what happens. They just seem to vanish as soon as the companions party enters a town.
The whole prisoner mechanics seem to be bugged atm, as hardly any noble prisoners can be found in prisons either.

anoddhermit 说:

Selling prisoners is the easiest way to get a constant flow of roguery XP.

Prison breaks give a lot of it but they're more risky.

点击展开...

Prison breaks are difficult at the moment, because AI lords don´t put their noble captives into prison for some reason. First and only noble prisoners I recently saw where held in a city that recently revolted.

9 months later and still no fix. This bug has gamebreaking potential.

MArdA TaleWorlds 说:

I've been told that this issue is not a bug but an intended choice. The AI party prioritizes to attack the enemy not joining the army. Because they believe they're the only one who can reach the enemy.

点击展开...

But often this behaviour is contra productive and exactly the opposite you need. Especially when there are more than one enemy parties nearby, the party rather chases a bunch of looters than going for the enemy that really matters.
It would be nice, if sooner or later there would be a possibility to give orders.

Momentarerly you can´t rely on what the concerning party will do. It´s seems random, although im quite sure it´s not random but theres some algorythm behind it, probably based on strength, speed, distance from each other etc... Often, it´s simply annoying. It even happens quite often, that the split party chases the "right" target but then, very shortly before catching it, suddenly decides to come back.

Flarone 说:

I just made another 142 long sword and can sell it 108557. You need to fix the same problem on all two handed swords that are too long and therefore sell too expensive and destroy the economics aspect of your great game.

Here is the sword size that sells 108557 but fix this bug everywhere please :
- long blade of superior steel scimitar (IV)
- bronze falx guard (V)
- long covered handle (IV)
- fan-shaped skin (V)
(don't forget to put the "length" gauge of each part of the sword to the maximum)

Thank you very much for paying attention to my request.
Best regards
Flarone

点击展开...

It´s not only two handers... you can make javelins that require far less material input, that sell even higher. The whole smithing system needs a rework.

AnandaShanti 说:

I received extra troops so I make a new part on the spot and add it to my army without moving, but the new party is away from my party, while moving towards them they ride by me and engage the enemy. I, the player, want them in my army 1st before I attack the enemy. I'm not okay with this, I think it's sloppy and needs to be changed so the party is exact where I am on the map when I make the party from my own members and immediately joins my army without being ABLE to try to engage anything.
Here is a .sav The Spice vendor party was just made but tries to attack enemies instead of joining my army, this cost me loss of troops even in the seconds to join the fight.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JwiFwuBL6cZXzXbzwYCp-EkD9XLvPVzI/view?usp=sharing

点击展开...

Thats a thing, that needs some rework. Because often you can use this behaviour to your advantage : When you want to chase an enemy party/army thats a little bit faster than your army you can disband one of your parties (the fastest one preferably) and take it back into the army right afterwards. If you are lucky, the party will show exactly the behaviour you described... and by doing so, involving the faster enemy into a battle which gives you the opportunity to catch up.

The problem is : You can bet, that at least in 50% of all situations the party does the exact opposite of what you want. If you want them to join you first, they will charge an enemy that doesn´t bother you at all and if you want them to charge an enemy that REALLY needs to get pinned, they will run back to mama.^^

I experimented a lot with this AI-behaviour and so far I just can say : It´s pretty random.

It would be nice if there was a possibility to give exact orders to parties that are allready enlisted in your army but still or temporarerly are split.

Disabled my mods and made and uploaded a savfile.

The savefile was allready sent. I will send it once more.

And i don´t know what happens to the imagelinks... thats the 2nd time that a functioning link suddenly doesn´t work anymore. My post above seems like it was edited.

I was lucky, I found the save.

By the time the game was saved, I allready tried (and failed) to intimidate the hostage-taker "Camnon the Spider" (Prodigal son-quest). When you now proceed with the "Rival gang moves in" quest (just talk to "Leadfoot Caribos") you will end up in this scene :



As you can see, it´s not the normal dialogue where the rivaling gangleader tries to buy you over at the very last moment. He refers to the ransom for the other quest, instead.
When you refuse to pay, however, you´ll be stuck in this scene like described above. Maybe you´ll even stuck if you pay, didn´t try that yet.

Edit : OK, just tested the other option. You´ll get stuck the same way, even if you pay.

Leaving via Taskmanager isn´t necessary though. You can still go back to the main menu. Didn´t realize that earlier.