搜索结果: *

dkdarkknight 说:

Hi all, i had the same issue before, but i was able to fix it by doing the following (windows 10):
-Go to Windows Security > Virus & threat protection > Ransomware protection > Allow an app through Controlled folder access > Add an allowed app > recently blocked apps > "taleworlds.mountandblade.launcher.exe"
-if you have the game open already, it should be able to save immediately.

good luck!

点击展开...

durbal 说:

Thanks for your input. I obviously just lack skills. Data showing them being the dominant force the plurality of times is not accurate or meaningful.

点击展开...

brognar 说:

This is why manhunters are needed, the player shouldn't be literally the only person on the continent attacking bandit hideouts. This wasn't so much of an issue in warband as the hideouts were fewer and there was more open terrain to flee bandits. As it stands now, every time you get captured you have to navigate a labyrinth of mountain passes full of enemy lords AND bandit parties that are unavoidable most times. It's frustrating and unfair.

点击展开...

Dearmad 说:

No. You forgot the anvil part of the hammer and anvil.

What's needed is tactics! They are easy to beat if you consider the battlefield. Bring the right troops. And play as a good general. Don't just throw stats at stats.

In my game I have a sizeable cavalry contingent (40% or more- all carefully developed to be well armored), a few archers (20%), and a shield line (this is important). Hammer and anvil man. Battanians die in droves. 1- I do not fight in forests when I need to preserve my troops. I pick flatter land, or at least open land like hills. I march my cavalry wide to the flank and then eventually behind their line. Had my shield wall hold and approach (sure some die but they are relatively cheap). When about 125m the shield line charges. The Battanians archers are all busy with that- Charge! Cav wipes them out. I lose 20% or so- they lose everyone. They usually rout when at about 40-50% losses, so the fight really snowballs then.

This game isn't all about troop attributes but HOW you use the battlefield, how you populate your warband, and who you know your enemy is going to be- there is no one army beats all. You have to be fluid.

点击展开...

Captain_Octavius 说:

What's really needed is a short accuracy penalty when ranged users move their aim significantly. Right now archers don't really care about cavalry moving around their ranks cause they can turn around and snipe with pinpoint accuracy immediately.

点击展开...

dursuncos05 说:

I don't think it's true. Yes they are stronger than other non-imperial kingdoms but (at least in my campaigns) i think imperial kingdoms are much stronger. Because they have heavy armored archers, infantaries and most importantly CATAPHRACTS. I have 25 Elite cataphract and they are slaughtering anyone stands in front of them.

点击展开...

Alenovic 说:

I just posted a similar post. About some custom games I did. The Battanians seems the strongest nation in the game. While the Sturgians are the weakest. I was just testing what troops to use against different nations and soon i saw how unbalanced nations are. Sturgians are known for their infantry... they got the weakest infantry of all factions... the defeats were insane... 80 deaths 20-30 kills. against all factions... even khuzait infantry was far stronger.. which i didnt expect.

in custom games 100 v 100 the Battanian hero seem as the strongest unit there is. Almost all sturgian units lose against their counterpart in 100 v 100.

I dont know why but the different faction currently are mega unbalanced...

点击展开...