搜索结果: *

Ok I just noticed there is a campaign.show_hideouts command, looks like it worked.

Not sure if it's the same bug, but I noticed I still only have level 1 parts after unlocking a lot of them. So after unlocking another few, I checked parts and I noticed an orange dot flashing on some locked parts... IIRC the orange dot means it's newly unlocked.

Edit: Huh, weird, it seems to be refreshing after changing category to another weapon and back. But not between swords I think. When I switched to axe and back to sword, it updated.

The screenshot is from before I figured out the refreshing.

I just got back to Bannerlord and decided to play as a Khuzait. So I made an Asian looking guy with black hair, pressed next and saw my parents. My dad is ginger, my mom is blonde. How did I end up black haired? Mom?

So is this a bug or not? This is still not fixed.

And we still can't get better limiting options than 2000? Really I think pushing the limit to 10k for the cost of slider accuracy would be really helpful. One of my garrison wages is currently 5130. I wanted to limit it to 4000. I won't cut it to less than 40% of current value.

I don't know if I should create a new topic or not, but I also have this dark red Leave Kingdom button that doesn't work and I'm not the ruler. I thought it's because we're at war, but after the war it's the same.
Edit: Ok found a solution - I was in a small army with my companions, needed to disband it.

Gortar 说:

Can we get the ability to make orders after battle ended back. I thought we already established that its stupid to take it away, like 3 patches ago. and how difficult it would be to just put it back in? @Dejan

点击展开...

This is the sole reason I stopped playing and I'm visiting the forums from time to time to check if they fixed it. It tilted me more than it should. Probably not even the fact that they took the feature away, just that they seem to all agree it was better WITH the feature than without it, yet they won't bring it back, because...

Dejan 说:

We have a task to improve this.

点击展开...

... even though this doesn't seem to be high on their list of priorities. How is it better to keep current, broken state of this matter until it's "improved" rather than reverting, again, even if only until it's "improved"? I already asked before and they seemed to agree that no one ever complained about how it works before they broke it, yet it's still ignored.
This is "don't fix what ain't broken" taken to the next level. Something wasn't broken, and they... Took it away just so it WAITS for a FIX.

Order UI while enemies fleeing back or not back? If not, why not, what's the future of it? Supposedly you weren't happy with the current state of this matter.

Hey, I'm appearing here every now and then to ask the same thing - Did they made the Order UI accessible again while enemies are fleeing? This thing annoyed me so much I stopped playing. It's so much against RP.

@Dejan Hi, what's up with Order UI inaccessible when enemies start fleeing, was it fixed/reverted?

Warbandit Bannerlordie 说:

My top annoying bugs during battles that need a fix for the sake of tactics and immersion.
(...)
3. Loss of the UI after the enemy flee, I pay and feed and train them, I tell them when they should cheer!

点击展开...

Funny you call it a bug (as almost all the players seeing this behavior change would)! This is a feature according to the devs.

surfalot 说:

Unfortunately, it does seem so in a first test.
It means you still always have to order all troops to full-out attack before your infantry/archers broke the enemies moral, otherwise you are the only one hunting down fleeing enemies while the rest of your troops is busy celebrating?..

点击展开...

I'm afraid the reason why they wouldn't revert is is beyond my understanding... I hate it so much that I only played 2 battles on 1.5.10 beta and didn't even try 1.6.0. Not gonna do it until they fix it. No idea what they tried to do by disabling this ability. I don't get what was broken, what was it supposed to fix.

Order UI still disappearing while enemies are fleeing?

HoneyBunny 说:

Forwarded to the design team on May, 7th. That "only recently" you've mentioned here happened on June, 14th. It's July, 31st today. And why exactly are you arguing about it? Or answer at all. Are you in capacity to provide me with an answer to the question that I have initially asked and/or entitled to talk on behalf this game devs?

点击展开...

Idk what are you talking about that happened on June 14th, but wI'm talking about what he said on July 22th.

Yes, I can answer you, but you should be able to answer yourself. They know that it's not how it should be and they were supposed to be talking about this issue after their holidays.

HoneyBunny 说:

This was reported on May, 5th.

点击展开...

It doesn't make a difference when it was reported. Previously they said it was by design. Only recently Dejan talked about discussing it with the devs.

HoneyBunny 说:

This fix isn't coming, is it? This is the way the game is gonna play from now on?

点击展开...

I don't think there was a game update since Dejan said he's going to bring this up after their holidays. Let's be fair. Wait at least till the next update with comments like this one.

What's most annoying to me is they can't predict the most obvious moves of incoming enemy armies. A big but slightly smaller than ours army is moving in the direction of the caste we're standing next to? Oh, yeah, let's just disband and spread out.

Dejan 说:

As Duh noted in another thread, this game mechanic will likely see further changes but it's not considered as a bug per se (rather, a gameplay mechanic that needs some more tweaking) - that's why this thread is marked as resolved.

点击展开...

Someone important really has to like how it works if you guys consider current solution (which needs tweaking) better than reverting it. Haven't seen a single comment saying this change is good. Did you?