I don't want to disagree, but the predecessor that we all love basically *is* someone's high school project and I am not surprised they want to make it similar to the original. On the other hand it's perfectly fair to expect better considering all the money, time and manpower they put into it.
I believe they are enjoying the game like the rest of the vast majority who give it a positive review on Steam (87% = 189.000).
I am not that much interested in mods that change gameplay or add features. The vanilla game is good enough in my opinion. If you want to change a specific thing that annoys you it's great that you can use a mod for it.
Can't argue against that.
You are most welcome.
That's not what I said though and it's not what we have been discussing.
So you don't see the difference between the NMS launch and Bannerlord launch. That's OK. I don't have time for that kind of discussion.
I know, that's why I said our opinion is less important than Steam reviews.
And your opinion is super important, right? I am sure Taleworlds takes notes.
The only thing less important than Steam reviews are a bunch of angry ex boyfriends on a forum...
But the players give it 8/10 as well, both on Metacritic and Steam...
It's not a fair comparison. NMS was at 3/10 at release if I remember correctly. Bannerlord already is at 8/10.
As long as they don't simulate every grashalm the game is a complete failure.
Because 9 women get a baby in 1 month, right?
How many leopards had to die for that picture?
Sorry but that's not a positive example.
It's OK, you can tell me about your feelings.
Thanks, I'll do that.