搜索结果: *

archaicwarrior 说:

..and what about the Wall's trench / MOAT ???? far more important.

troops need to carry bundles of wood (f-a--g--g--o--t) to fill the trench before the tower can move forward.

I would prefer to see this happen , make sieges longer and more expensive in lives.

点击展开...

Badcritter 说:

I don't have much sense of nostalgia for Warband sieges. They could be fun at times, but it was one of the weaker parts of the game compared to what it could potentially have been. Bannerlord is more ambitious about it, which is good... but there's a lot of problems to work through at this point.

For me Warband sieges kind of devolved into bringing an army full of Rhodok Sharpshooters and having them hold fire behind their shields until the defenders ran out of arrows. Then fire at will to wipe out a wave of defenders. Hold fire while the new wave spawned in and expended their arrows. Fire at will. etc. Repeat. Win.

点击展开...

Bibito 说:

Guys I'm playin on easiest and I feel same, and this game has so much potential for future, but how is gameplay on realistic or on some other difficulties? I mean on a siege I lay my archers and they kill half of walls, but on realistic this is surely different.

点击展开...

hruza 说:

I don't have problem with sieges beeping somehow schematic -with preset entry points. it would be very hard to program and probably very buggy and easy to abuse otherwise. It is however much more expanded system from what Warband offered. My complain is that player can not really control troops much. Giving him control over what troops to attack/assign were (gate, laders, tower...) and when would be nice.

However I agree that defending AI is very bad right now. Shieldwall is completely ineffective formation for close fighting and having large group of men camping in front of the gate does nothing. They just get slaughtered. They should switch to charge as soon as gate breaks.

I also like your idea of AI being more tactical about tactical locations. They should be like defensive nodes that AI needs to hold or take in certain order and not just sending soldiers on ignore everything command to the location on the other side of the map. AI -both attacking and defending one should try to secure one "key" location before proceeding to attack/defend another. Every such location should have two positions, one for infantry and one for archers (different for attacker and defender obviously) and infantry should have certain radius in which they will charge any enemy, not just stand in the shieldwall waiting to be killed.

点击展开...

Lesbosisles 说:

Would be nice if the defender AI know how to retreat and regroup their forces. For example, when the significant amount of attacking troops climb onto the walls, the defenders should leave the walls and regroup somewhere in the city center (there are barricades for a reason). IDK if it is possible to create additional spots on the rooftops in the city for archers too.

What's AI doing right now is spawning and rushing back on the walls when there are a vast amount of attackers already waiting for them. And as soon as the walls and gates are taken, defenders just run away, never regroup (as they do in the field battles by the way) and pah - you've got the city. Boring.

点击展开...