搜索结果: *

+1 amoggus

"Fixing" is not the correct term in there, that's why I didn't just say fix without quotation marks. Making a code piece more accessible is not fixing it but making it.. well.. more accessible.

点击展开...

If the problem was only removing the internal classes then I would agree, but, as stated in the letter there are other issues that also need fixing.

And that can take time - however, designing that in the beginning by thinking about the modders would take more time. Especially if your design can change/gets updated/revised etc. before the deadline. And this happens quite often in the game industry.

点击展开...

Designing a game with modders in mind would not take more time and if done right, would save TW lots of hours refactoring an already existing codebase. Besides, I would agree with your statement if modding wasn't such a huge part of the mount and blade franchise. Not taking modding into account while designing the game is a huge missed opportunity and sadly its shows.

No. I'm saying that they will "fix" those issues after the release. If they still continue being stubborn and refuse to provide a proper documentation and guide for modding, then it's 100% on TW.

点击展开...

Fixing your code after you supposedly finished the game will take way longer than keeping the modders in mind while creating the features as you go.

sakirma 说:

The modding community does know how to use Harmony but with every patch that comes out, there is a high chance that the harmony code will break. Modding communities are trying their best NOT to use Harmony but instead the code which is provided since this will create a mod that is maintainable and compatible with other mods.

In our communication with TaleWorlds, they advised us against using Harmony.

点击展开...

+1

As a software engineer student with a lot of knowledge it is still weird to put a constant height and lenght on the map