搜索结果: *

Corsair831 说:

Answer to OP, this game is actually very enjoyable however because of the long EA period this sub has a large number of permanent lingerers who are rather embittered by TW's slow progress to develop the game, and have subsequently developed a culture of egging each other on about how bad the game is. This is a very common thing on gaming forums.

Myself and all of my friends absolutely love the game, and take it as it is. There's nothing quite like it, and even though it could do with a bit more polish there are hundreds of hours of entertainment to be had, and the experience of commanding hundreds of troops assaulting realistically rendered castles which soldiers actually defend in formations and with siege equipment is frankly amazing. I also rather enjoy the RPG skill tree and how many possible build choices there are.

Factional, troop and item variety is also fantastic, with each faction having a rich backstory and definable playstyle.

The game is not perfect, but it is very good.

点击展开...

Goyyyio 说:

Bannerlord is a good game with Bannerkings and several other mods that add depth and make it interesting.

点击展开...

STcloz 说:

But block a heavy cavalry's charge with a knife?

点击展开...

NoRegretz00 说:

I wouldn't compare TW to EA, I'd argue taleworlds are much slower Devs than EA considering bannerlord took like 9 years of development to actually release and is still an unfinished, bug filled mess while EA pump out like 12 different sport games every year

点击展开...

CaptainLee 说:

They've denied it previously, but I stand by my assertion that the vast majority of Devs were shifted on to another project and only a skeleton crew remains to 'finish' Bannerlord.

点击展开...

Overestimated 说:

I think it would make high skill lords really stand out in the wars and since they always start out in the battles making them more skilled would make it a bit more likely that they could survive until the end of a long battle.

点击展开...

Totalgarbage 说:

Well, one possible remedy for single-player only is for units (including the player) to take some of the damage if they're blocking a swinging polearm or 2-handed weapon slash with a one-handed weapon (not shield) but they won't get staggered due to the damage. I'm not sure what the appropriate percentage of damage that is blocked/passes through the block would be though.

点击展开...

Antaeus 说:

Well that depends on the nature of your story doesn't it. Edward Rutherfurd might tell you a story that spans 10,000 years. Isaac Asimov might tell you a story that spans 50,000 years or more. In that context, a hundred years or so in this game is nothing.

And yes, there are in fact novels, movies etc out there that end unsatisfactorily with the lead characters accepting the normalcy of their existence, knowing that their future will just be more of the same. It is a common cynical trope amongst indie films and novels.

So to an extent, your suggestion that books and stories provide the ideal narrative example for this game, is in fact flawed - as there are examples that directly contradict the idea that a classic 'end' is important, or even desired.

Perhaps the lesson of Bannerlord, is in fact a meditation on the futility of human violence, that it begets more violence. and more. and more. without end.

点击展开...

Jehiel 说:

Really? You think that? There has never, ever been a time in history when a commander made a mistake and started a battle he shouldn't have? There has never been a time when someone decided to take a risk and go for a pitched battle they were slightly weaker for? You think there's literally no reason, huh? That never ever happened before in history? Wow.

点击展开...

Antaeus 说:

To be fair... this is a lot like the real world.

I mean, what is like playing late game Earth IRL? So many fires to put out. Endless wars popping up...

点击展开...

adrakken 说:

Nonsense like that is causing some developers to laugh.

Now what? Look, someone pointed out the obvious and thus must be true. Only a non-developer would believe that a game being made and released is going to effect another developer in such a way. Its just clickbait and fake outrage. The game could sell 100x more copies than it has and it will change a grand total of nothing in the industry. Players will keep pre-ordering games at the same rate from the same companies. They will keep buying lootboxes. They will keep buying games with microtransactions and keep buying the microtransactions they sell. They will keep buying games that openly state they are going to base their income off of overpriced DLCs and will keep paying for those overpriced DLCs. They will buy the next game from the last company that released an unfinished, buggy game they raged about.

Nothing is going to change, because consumers are not going to change. If you do not know who I am talking about. I mean you. Especially those of you that watch clickbait fake outrage videos. You are raging against things you will actually do NOTHING to change in your own consuming choices which feeds the thing you PRETEND you hate so much. You are basically a self-harmer and love it. Now then, hop onto reddit and post about how much you despise Nvidia and their business practices before you go research the next Nvidia card you are going to buy soon...or post about how much you hate Disney and how they are ruining your favorite IP while you watch Disney+ and that same IPs new show you are posting about hating so much...s

点击展开...

mikeboix 说:

No answer from Dejan here, I see. He asks and he disappears.

点击展开...

Ananda_The_Destroyer 说:

No actual endgame at all: You paint the map? Hurray, now nothing special happens and nothing will ever happen.

点击展开...

Mad Vader 说:

Wait for Bannerlord: Remounted with prettier graphics to pay twice!

点击展开...