搜索结果: *

Orion 说:

This is true. The thing is that we have rules we all agree to follow when we register on the forum. Some ways are acceptable, and others aren't. He knows which is which, but would disregard that and repeatedly tried ways which he knew weren't acceptable. So,
Yes.

点击展开...

Which rule in particular did he break this time? I guess it should be something between 1.1 and 1.2.

But he is not harassing and trolling or spamming. He could be accused of flaming....but hey, no discussion happened here since everyone is agreeing with him.

Rybn47 说:

Isn't it a problem since the beggining of EA? basically what you have to do is to own your desired fief as soon as possible to avoid others to upgrade everythng to level 3 and avoid prosperity being too high

点击展开...

Which is as stupid as it can be. Is like saying ancient rome was staring even while being the most rich city on earth. If you have money, food shall arrive in one way or the other.

Unless there was a famine, it was literally impossible for cieties and castle to be missing food

Guys...attending to a city shouldn't mean having to fech goods for village constables and similar thing. And in my view it should not make you personally deal with them. You're a mighty lord, not a village head...

Anyway, the amount of tasks given at the moment with just two city and four villages is overwhelming. I literally can't do a single thing apart from resolving quest and this is a problem.

For me it is stupid thinking that "taking care of the city" must involve finding 30 cow for dude A and 30 sheep for dude B, which also ,at least for me, break immersion. I expect that taking care of the city should be something more high level than what we have now. Policies and edicts at city and holdings level, special event like plagues, fires and so on...and of course you should not be forced to constantly hang around your holding all the time...this mean that during war you're unable to partecipate in any battle and even replenish your forces