搜索结果: *

Having played above a thousand hours with MB I (MB, WB and three hours With Fire and Sword) and passed a hundred with MB II, I find that MBII has the better potential, but as most others also say, that it needs a workthru. I miss the effects that Borcha and Jeremus had in WB. Some kind of skill in logistics making moving larger companies easier. And even with 100 in morale I haven´t got beyond 18 in leadership yet (should raise an army). The speed of raising skills is somewhat flawed/puzzling. Perks are fine, but maybe a wider array? I find MB the better for feeling the battle, even though I want to place my army more like Total War (I can´t find any way to rotate) and perks to be a little more Fallout (without the searching).

Having played MB and Warband for quite a while, I find that MB2 has less terrain penalties. It feels weird to keep the same pace on the horse up and down the hill, and nearly never bumping into obstacles. Circkling a group in MB would often get you stuck against a tree or stone, but now I just ride through almost everything. Possibly my graphics card is so old that the game just show trees and not put them there, but it feels wrong. I'm also bothered by the swordswing, but as a rather poor meleefighter at any time I prefer the bow. In MB1/WB you had a much more prominent ballistic curve. In MB2 the arrow will go much straighter. All my enemies gets a new haircut as I consistently aim to high. I have only tested real bows (old style, not modern ones) a few times, and I feel that the arrows will drop faster than in MB2. Just look at how movies demonstrate how they aim for the sky to hit the enemy at far distances.