搜索结果: *

Messius 说:

If it was just a chat during battle, it would probably be useless but if it was also in the menu, it would be awesome. Definitely a good and interesting idea.

点击展开...

thanks man

Hurra! Loads of stuff i love here.

Wardrobe_Fuat 说:

I agree %100 with all you just said. Vlandians have too much armor for sergeant and knight while costing same with other heavy infantry and cavalry. A very big game breaker issue, and it seems they have ignored this in this patch also.

点击展开...

Considering that the Peasant Levy also has the Looter perk wich in a way makes the seargant even cheaper.

Consul_Kaiser 说:

This would be an amazing quality of life system. Wish this was a mod

点击展开...

ty, have been wishing for someting like this since warband. If only i had computer skills beyond MsPaint.

+

Calabanar 说:

The basic hand meshes being open.

It looks so stupid, why not have a closed fist? It works for gripping and free hands. It's so simple but it reinforces the feeling these aren't characters but disfunctional digital puppets.

点击展开...

+

placing of troopsbefore battle is something i love especcialy when i'm on defending side.
Getting to see what terrain i'm working with before the poop hit the fan.
The preference system works like a charm for me with different cavalry groups.

For the current state of the game, maybe ladders should be easier to kick over?

Sieges need more fun/polish/implementations before balance can be properly adressed.

I don't mind the historical inaccurassy or balance issues. but rather that the battles lack player agency, wich makes them repetative and boring.
Ordering units around in siege battles is often a bad idea since it interferes with the preset "siege AI".
Holding "alt"-key to see where units are is not a thing.
It seems to me that some Siege maps are designed with an intention of battle inside the walls as well but its not implemented yet.

A solution could be to make Sieges more of a capture point game rather than the field battle with walls that it is now.
Holding gatehouse, left wall, right wall. and main square. holding a capture points makes enemy reinforcements spawn further back in the castle/town.

I voted no, but there are things i like about the system and i am excited to see improvements to it.

I like that i can set orders before the battle starts, like dismounting cav in village battles. setting groups into formations.
I think the slider functions have good potentional but need more tags (like 2 handed, light armour, etc.)
Choosing captains is also a fun mechanic and makes building companions much more interesting.

Now to the critisicm.
The biggest issue for me has been when reinforcments come in. every thing turns into a mishmash of different units because the reinforcments just spawn into the default groups. for example if you set ranged units to formation 4 in the OoB phase, when the reinforcments spawn ranged troops, they will be assigned to formation 2 even if that formation card has assigned preference to infantry with Throwing weapon.

The troop assignment you do in OoB needs to be "stricter" in a sense. As in: if you tag a formation with throwing weapons ONLY units with throwing weapons will spawn in that formation.

I think a solution would be if TW would do away with the preference system and let the player assign troops strictly to a certain formation card instead and have reinforcments adhere to those assignments.