搜索结果: *

Depressinho 说:

your clan is a faction in itself i think so the caravan should fly your flag

点击展开...

mexxico 说:

For example if you form your caravan at Makeb and if you make a graph collecting its positions in all its travels you will see distribution will be something like this :

I know this is not enough to protect your caravans 100% and people want more micromanagement but it has no priority currently but we are collecting what are wanted for future. You can use above data for now.

点击展开...

mexxico 说:

By the way I am not sure player would gain trade xp because of having caravan however companion probably would. I am not only one deciding these things will check later.

点击展开...

mexxico 说:

I again tested latest situation by forming 3 different caravans at game start. I give my character 3 caravan forming cost money by cheat and formed 3 caravans, one at Aserai town Quyaz, one at Sturgia town Omor and one at Khuzait town Chaikand. Only one is destroyed at day 15. After 10 days past from the day it is destroyed I formed another caravan from same town. In total I formed 4 caravans. The latest one I formed and two of first three caravans survived at the end of first year. They all bring me 114K, I payed about 30K for caravan wages. In total I ended year with 96K of money just doing nothing but waiting in a town (some money remained from initial money cheats thats why my end money is not fit perfectly). Also still I have 3 caravans running probably they will bring me another 100K until they are destroyed.

Of course situation can change in late game (where bandits are 3x powered) or if you have lots of enemies or if you executed lots of lords in Calradia and if bandits are overpopulated however I made another test this morning in late game (year 1093) too. Situation was not so different, a bit risky than this. Some players get used to earn much from caravans (1K daily for long years like 400 days in total 400K from one caravan) however these caravans are not supposed to feed your armies. These are side mechanics. If you do not like new numbers and risks you do not have to form them. They were so OP before after nerf they are still good, if you see no value you do not have to form them. If player swims in money game become not challanging. We are also aware of lord battles are so easy and give tons of loot they will be fixed too. Different people are responsible from different parts. We are not trying to make game so hard but it should be reasonable not so hard not so easy.

I know game has missing features, some perks are not working, there are less quests less diplomacy options, war peace mechanics are a bit basic currently. Here lots of people are working for a better game in weird world conditions and everybody has their own responsible areas. Any of us cannot fix problems out of our responsible areas. I am trying to make parts which I am responsible better. If you need other things to be fixed before balancing / trade issues you need to reach people responsible from these parts, they are all aware of problems and working hard too. I am here sharing developments with you and getting your ideas / feedbacks to create a better and balanced trade systems.

Any changed formula or game rule is not final point currently. We will collect datas watch gameplays and do needed adjustments in next patches if needed.

We know you want more micro management at parts you are spending time at game. All ideas will be evaluated. According to priority and time we will schedule and implement some of them.

点击展开...

mexxico 说:

Actually home settlement is very important variable for this problem. You can select home settlement according to possible risks. For now thats all you can do later more options can be added.

点击展开...

Bramborough 说:

3) I don't think quests increase their Influence. The relations increase, obviously, does unlock additional recruitment slots, so sometimes means there's some additional noble troops available that would've been locked to the player at zero relations. But you knew that already, I'm sure.

点击展开...

World's Coolest Old Guy 说:

I do excellent work against cavalry with circles. Squares are less reliable. They don't really slow cavalry like they should, IMO. Sure, the cavalry should trample its way through some men, but the horse realistically isn't going to go from end to end of a square consisting of 200 men every single time.





Not necessarily as such. Badass, to be sure. But the force of a horse charging into a spear would generally break it, or at the very least rip it out of the spearman's grasp. Personally, I'd rather we give horses a sort of "morale" whereby if they see enough spears arrayed against them, they'll sometimes just refuse to charge beyond a certain point.

点击展开...

Moonweb 说:

Circle and square are defensive formations from which only the edge fighters can strike, that's why. You don't stay in a square after the cavalry charge has been survived - try column instead. Column is a French tactic from the hundred years war that presents a small target for (British) archers, creates a wall that is tough for flankers to attack and from which all members can strike, ergo it is an attacking formation.

点击展开...

Under_score 说:

You guys have probably already figured this out but if you trade with caravans, the unit value does not change the more you buy/sell like it does in town.
Also, is the marked profits perk bugged for anyone else, or just me (it doesn't mark profits)?

点击展开...