搜索结果: *

Absolutely. I'm constantly having to zoom way out, to make sure I'm traveling in the right direction. Warband had a compass, so I think it's a safe bet it'll be implemented here as well.

This is a pretty popular request, and wouldn't involve creating entirely new game mechanics, so I'd bet there's a pretty good chance this will be implemented. I do hope so, for the sake of the role-playing experience.

ABAlphaBeta 说:

Far inferior to the time-old tradition of throwing a missile into the nearest allies' face

点击展开...

I do this in tournaments, whenever my team makes the mistake of giving me the javelins! I usually wait until they're mid-cheer, for greatest effect.

Rearing your horse is a great touch, but for players that don't fight on horseback, lost their horse during battle, or ended up in a tournament without a horse, there aren't many options. It would be nice to see some sort of emote system, that would let you cheer, taunt, salute, bow, do a flourish with your weapon, shake hands, that sort of thing. They already have a "wheel selection" system in place for certain buttons, so at least some of the framework is already there.

I'm gonna bump this, because it's a great idea, and would answer a lot of questions the current troop tree leaves a mystery. When Legionaries and Menavliatons have the same skills and are both classified as heavy infantry, you need to know what makes them different. You can't rely on the unit preview either... in the example above, they both appear to have a spear, and neither appears to have a shield, both of which are not the case for the actual troops.

Hide and seek with the village kids: the single best suggestion on this entire forum. I need this in my life. +1!

Yes! This can be pretty frustrating, since there's not one "best" troop for all hideout types. But when the hideout has 48 sea raiders, there are definitely certain of my men I do not want in there with me! Since there's no realistic reason why a commander would not be able to make a choice like that, I've got high hopes that they'll add this in. The framework for setting certain numbers of troops aside for tasks is already there, after all.

When it comes to marriage, NPC's should generally line up with reality (nobles marry nobility, etc.), in order to keep the sense of immersion. So "marrying up" should be difficult (though not impossible for the highly charming, etc.). But reality should never bar an option from the player, especially not "marrying down." The point of open-world games like this is that you can write your own story, and there are plenty of roles that can be played in Bannerlord that do not involve being a noble anyway. If you choose to be a traveling merchant, or a highwayman that ends up wanted in every town, it's absurd that you should not be able to marry common characters or companions. Even if you are a noble, you should still be allowed to buck the rules if you really want to and marry a commoner. Maybe there can be some sort of influence penalty to keep things grounded. But either way, you should never take away the player's ability to choose for themselves, especially with such an important life choice.

Quests involving tournaments would be amazing! However, I quite enjoy the higher frequency of tournaments in Bannerlord compared to Warband. For people like me who love doing as many of them as possible, it reduces the likelihood of traveling across the world for a tournament, only to miss it by a day or two. This was a constant frustration for me in Warband.

Though I do agree that there should be special occasions in towns from time to time. Perhaps some sort of feast, where all the lords of the faction gather in one place for a few days, making tournaments much more lively.