搜索结果: *

  1. Chaosreaper187

    looking for a rough overview of what has changed since july

    oh great, on performance. how are sieges doing? I remember always having crashes or low framefrates during those as well as the troops generally not wanting to go up the ladders but I guess that falls under AI
  2. Chaosreaper187

    looking for a rough overview of what has changed since july

    I last played a couple of months ago and have also not been following the pacth notes so much, I'm more interested in diving back in due to the alleged implementation of skill perks like steward and tactics in 1.5.4 beta. Since bannerlord perks hasn't been updated to include 1.5.4 yet do any of...
  3. Chaosreaper187

    This is an open letter, aimed at revealing the China censorship going on right now by the Chinese mods,TW should be report investigate progess

    Just let taleworlds do what they need to do in order to have access to China as a market. I don't mean to say I agree with the autocratic way of the Chinese government, but what good would it do taleworlds if MB2 got banned in China? Just because they didn't want to censor some chats? I'm not saying censorship is good, but maybe censorship is better than not being able to play the game at all.
  4. Chaosreaper187

    balance vs content

    bigbalzzz 说:
    tbh didnt expect a crushing majority going fixes and features though this could con

    no one said 100
    1 for now would be good
    点击展开...
    Still, new content takes longer to push out. Balance is basically math and needs to be tested continuously and with multiple patches
  5. Chaosreaper187

    balance vs content

    Maximum997 说:
    Unbalanced game may be more fun then balanced. Becouse you have so much funny things to do.
    点击展开...
    Then they might as well never do balance. What are you trying to argue for or are you just arguing for the sake of it
  6. Chaosreaper187

    balance vs content

    bigbalzzz 说:
    balancing the game in the current state is stupid. nerfing weapons,trade simulations is stupid.
    all these things are effected by perks that are not in yet
    how can you balance something without a feature tied to it that changes it entirely

    balance updates before perks and features are a joke
    with all respected the devs are finding holes and digging deeper into a never ending circle of balance
    because once perks come out the whole system will need balance re-adjustment
    time is money stop wasting money on temporary solution and put it into the features
    点击展开...
    1. Changing balance and adding new content isn't done by the same people at taleworlds, therefore content might take longer while balance takes faster.
    2. This is early access where devs are supposed to work on balance via player input. Would a player play an unbalanced unfun game? No, so balance should be improved upon in order to encourage good player experience which helps in developing the game.
    3. In terms of testing balance, if you add 100 balance changes at the same time and it messes up the game how do you know which change affected the game bad? Exactly, you don't. That's why balance needs to be done continuously, to be able to pinpoint the issues.
  7. Chaosreaper187

    When can we receive new contents?

    The true one 说:
    Does the result of investing in stability be bugfixes within a month? Then I think they will continue to do bug fixes next month.


    for example
    • Council of Commons policy effect was 1 influence per notable in the settlement, it is now 0.1 influence per notable. Also, +1 militia effect per notable is removed.
    • There was no waiting time after captured lords were released; they were spawning at the next daily tick, now they spawn at least 2 days later.
    • Lords spawn with 10% of their party size filled instead of 25%
    • Cavalry advantage in simulations is reduced to 20% from 30%
    • Mercenary groups in taverns have increased in size (2x) and their average level has increased.
    And I wonder how these are patches for stability. This is just a numerical adjustment. It's enough for moders to fix.

    More Important thing is others
    点击展开...
    Modders aren't making the game and earning money from it, the devs are so they are right to fixing balance. Besides, not everybody in the company is working on the same things. Incredible, right? This means a team will be responsible for animations and textures while another is responsible for AI. These are just examples.
    There's probably a team working on new content as we speak, it's just not in a ready state yet.
    But the things is that balance needs to be tested, the number changing part is probably simple but there's more to it than that. This is an early access, and testing balance and other stuff is needed for a game like this with many complicated features
  8. Chaosreaper187

    Patch Notes e1.2.1 & Beta Hotfix

    MostBlunted 说:
    Also you didn´t want to spam your own forum in the stickied thread in the first post? So we have to search for your names to get those "changes"?

    Your "real" update won´t have any new stuff compared to the hotfix or will it? I bet it won´t...

    When can we expect a real major update, like real new features (giving a fief to a vassal for example when I already own it)? Not just juggling with some numbers.

    Why can modders do this but not the devs?
    点击展开...
    Because modders can focus on small fixes without regards to the bigger picture and future content.
    Have you ever tried loading up the game with 10 different mods that make different fixes. It very likely will cause issues if it loads at all, because those mods are not compatible with each other, overlap and contradict each other.
  9. Chaosreaper187

    Is this game feature complete?

    countzero 说:
    Are all intended mechanics and features already implimented and were just at balancing and bug hunting now or is there more stuff to add?

    I onyl ask becaue it mostly seems exactly the same as warband with the exception of the odd little thing taken from warband mods.
    点击展开...
    I remember callum saying that they are currently working on implementing the rest of the perks. Later in the EA they are going to implement more diplomacy options and more kingdom options.
    Also I remember from release that they said they would add a unique scene for every settlement, which I'm looking forward to a lot.
  10. Chaosreaper187

    roadmap

    It won't happen
  11. Chaosreaper187

    Sturgian Druzhinnik identity?

    Earth Dragon 说:
    Have you read anything in this thread?

    That's exactly what SHOULDN'T happen
    点击展开...
    Yeah I glanced over it, it's basically sturgia should be more Russian because nationalism.
    Just move the drushniks to the main branch and it will be more accessible, maybe make us choose between brigand and drushniks or give the drushniks throwing weapons and make the brigand upgrade to them.
    And give everybody throwing axes.
    It only makes sense, who are the main enemy of the Sturgians?
    To the far west the vlandians, spears will be beneficial against their cav and shields will be good against their crossbows.
    To the south the battanians, really good archers but still mostly infantry so skirmish cav is enough, infantry will need to do most of the work anyway.
    To the east is the most dangerous foe, the khuzaits.
    Honestly with the way ranged works in the game right now there's no way sturgia would beat them on an open field. Drushniks are no match for their heavy cavalry and their horse archers will just murder them as well.
    Better to stick with infantry and a small amount of skirmish cav
  12. Chaosreaper187

    Sturgian Druzhinnik identity?

    Just remove the drushniks or move them to the main upgrade path and make the varyags upgrade to huscarls.
  13. Chaosreaper187

    Poll Warband vs Bannerlord

    shatti 说:
    u watch too many ****
    u have only 30 GB left in ur hard-desk
    you can download only one game
    go
    点击展开...
    I actually went back to warband yesterday because I was feeling like playing brytenwalda against after the new season of the last kingdom.
    What is surprising is that the melee combat AI is really bad, 1 v 1 s are actually fun in bannerlord because the AI will block your attacks but in warband it's really easy to know when you should attack them
  14. Chaosreaper187

    The word "priority" is definitely not in the dev's dictionary...

    Callum 说:
    You do realise that it isn't the same people working on those two entirely separate things right?

    However, if we put that to one side, I can tell you that perks are currently being completely reworked which is why no fixes or changes have come to existing ones just yet. Kindom management is something that we planned to expand upon later during EA.
    点击展开...
    Most people here realise it but there's a vocal minority that doesn't grasp the fact that it's possible to work on more than one different parts of the game at once
  15. Chaosreaper187

    Mods I won't play the game without.

    The Leviathan 说:
    Do you really not get the saying? I'm not even Brazilian and its pretty simple to understand. Basically the balancing TW is currently doing is the equivalent of trying to fix severed arm with a band aid.
    点击展开...
    Yeah sure I can try to guess the saying or it's meaning or try to read into the hints of the facial impressions of the writer of the comment through my telekinetic powers.
    Or the commenter could basically explain what they mean instead of basically saying: we have (this) saying in Brazil, it's so fitting haha.
    There was just a statement and no argument and I asked for elaborating not just repeating the same statement
  16. Chaosreaper187

    The word "priority" is definitely not in the dev's dictionary...

    Pejot 说:
    They are split into different teams working on different parts of the game. Each with own priorities. If one makes changes faster they are released. Small graphic adjustments seems to take shorter time to be done while working on complex coding for some mechanics takes longer and will be released later.
    点击展开...
    This +1000. someone should automatically reply with this message every time somebody post the same stupid question a hundred times
  17. Chaosreaper187

    Im curious as to when it started becoming an industry standard to let unpaid people(modders) fixing their games for you?

    xdj1nn 说:
    1. It's not an industry standard. - No it isn't, but it's a trend.
    2. But I wish it was. - Are you serious? That's borderline slave work if you look into it at certain perspectives.
    3. As far as a timeline for when developers started integrating modability into their games as a central feature, that stretches faaaaar back into the 80s. - That doesn't have anything to do with the topic, but okay
    点击展开...
    It isn't slave work because they aren't forced to do it. It would be more like open source with the only difference that a company is earning money from it, which is kinda stupid.
    Te-Ryn 说:
    THATS how you read that? *facepalm*
    点击展开...
    No I'm sure you didn' t mean it like that because who would but in all seriousness, taleworlds are fixing their game by themselves and with our feedback and aren't relying on modders to do it. Just because some people like to mod their games doesn't mean that it's obligatory to play the game. The fact that m&b has such a vibrant modding community is a good thing and a fact that taleworlds should take advantage of and give the modders all the tools they need to be creative
  18. Chaosreaper187

    Im curious as to when it started becoming an industry standard to let unpaid people(modders) fixing their games for you?

    Te-Ryn 说:
    All i ever see is people these days when it comes to games with mod-able content/games is saying "Just let the modders fix it"! It seems to me that any game that has the ability to be modded has severe issues with proper QA and testing and pisspoor programming.

    I feel like im just conspiracy thinking but it seems to be the mentality of these devs(and when i say these i mean industry wide not just TW) to just do barebones core programming with minimal QA then just leave it up to modders to fix and balance or to let the players be the QA. Ill use Ark for an example. This dev team does literally 1 test of their patches..."does it launch?". It doesnt matter if thier patch destroyes hundreds of hours of work. "Opps sorry" is the response if any at all. Skyrim has an unofficial fix everything patch and everything else that the devs couldnt be bothered with...same with Fallout4.

    Now i know we are only in EA and TW devs have been pumping out quality patches with only a few unstable updates AND have a beta branch we can opt into to help with the whole EA bugs things so i actually have slightly more faith in this dev team than some of the others but my question still stands.

    At which point did we start having more faith in random unpaid modders to fix professional gaming companies errors and why is this acceptable?
    点击展开...
    So you're saying taleworlds should forbid modders from improving the game?
  19. Chaosreaper187

    Mods I won't play the game without.

    xdj1nn 说:
    because even though ppl call it "balancing" it isn't, it's what we say back in Brazil: To cover the sun with a sieve. Great popular saying hahaha
    点击展开...
    Please elaborate for all of us who don't know brazilian
  20. Chaosreaper187

    Mods I won't play the game without.

    xdj1nn 说:
    They'll have to re-do all the balancing each time a new feature is introduced ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    点击展开...
    I'm not sure why you think that's an argument for not doing it. You also have to do bug fixing every time you add new content, it doesn't mean you shouldn't fix already present bugs just because new ones will emerge later.
    The game is in EA, but they still have to maintain balance in order for players to enjoy it now. Why have a game in early access if you as a developer aren't allowed to tinker with it?
后退
顶部 底部