搜索结果: *

RavenMount 说:

Actually I did exactly that.

In my 1.2 game I filled my first town with like 300 T3-5 troops. By the time I also got a castle I already have like 500 in the first town so I just split it. Among those are like 60+ Legionair, 60+ paletine. In fact I made a point of not garrisoning recruit in my towns.

It's extremely fast. If you have 50 recruit with you, fighting ~50 looter will see at least 1/2 of them upgrade to tier 2 with a few to tier 3.
Extra fast if you're training archer since they would just snipe all the one running away.

And no I didn't get bored. Had quite a bit of fun in fact, and still remember my name.

点击展开...

imgran 说:

Come on, there is literally no good reason why the best you can do is to train 1 unit at a time in an army of hundreds.

A real army would do drills at the company levelthat would increase the skill level of whole companies at a time. the Romans certainly did this.

When medieval lords trained their fyrds and levies they certainly didn't do it 1 soldier at a time.

There is no reason training should be limited to 1 soldier at a time and plenty of reason to eliminate that limit.

The two biggest issues with balance in the game are recruit spam and snowballing. Proper large scale passive training would solve one and mitigate the other. If lords could throw together a mid tier force in the courts of 2-3 weeks that was undertrained against a truly elite force but could hold its own, trained units would keep their significance without costing a disadvantaged side the ability to defend itself. And it would certainly help a disadvantaged side pick itself up and dust itself off if it wasn't running armoes of 80% recruits.

It's to the point where you're trying to force lords to just... HAVE trained units. And yet you stubbornly refuse to even look at the idea of allowing them to train them themselves. WHY? There is literally no good reason not to incorporate passive training regimens into this game. There is no reason not to incorporate a version of the "training" skill from Warband into the Leadership skill tree. There is no reason you can't arbitrarily assign "levels" to each tier of unit in order to limit the ability of underdeveloped players to train units up to tier 4.

This CAN be done. It can be done EASILY. There is no reason other than pure bullheaded masochism not to add it into the game.

点击展开...

pyronac 说:

my steward skill is over 225, i get the bonus to party size from the skill. however, i am not getting a bonus to my party size from any skill perk. i have both the bonus to party size for number of fiefs as well as the bonus for number of vassals. i am not getting that bonus. i then noticed i am not getting the bonus from horsemanship neither. is there a bug in the game preventing perks form increasing the party size? because non of the perks are doing what they claim in regards to increasing the party size.

点击展开...

zenDzee 说:

The most useful skill - Stewart, it increases party size.
Second - Leadership, increases party morale.
And Charm, opens some dialogue options.

点击展开...

giltirn 说:

+1 for training camps and trainer skills. It's completely unrealistic to have to genocide legions of bandits in order to grind up soldiers for a garrison. IRL virtually all combat experience would come through training.

点击展开...

LordRumblebee 说:

I'm still able to train troops really quickly just by auto-resolving against bandits. It's pretty tough when you first start on a new save but it's not that difficult especially once you get rolling. And as you build up in the game you'll get access to recruit higher level troops right from the settlements.

点击展开...