搜索结果: *

My experience is that NPCs don't seem to get hit shield on back, as if the damage reduction is hardcoded for player only.

Export your character to a text file, change the proficiency, then import it back?
Or use the cheat code (Ctrl+W?)
There's also a function in the module system to change weapon proficiency. I don't have it right now, but you can search.

Sorry for bringing this up again.
I finally found out another problem: after adding a new faction and new lords, I forgot to modify the banner assignment, so the hero_offset overflew the available banners.

I still believe that the xp gain is a safe guard against this type of errors...

3) Won't be a problem at all. I recall Ymira starts with 2 trade points at CHA 5, or something like that.

Septa Scarabae 说:

Out of curiousity, was this new artwork incorporated into v.1.010? I still have v.1.003 installed, and I haven't seen it. I like it.

点击展开...

You can easily use the resource hacker to add it in.

I had the same leveling problem with 0.903 or 0.960, and at that time I also had deserter party with only my player character in it. Turned out it's a problem with missing a few lines so some dialog lines or indices messed up or something.

Now I have the same problem with 1.010 when changing things around. Yes, I can workaround the problem like someone did in this thread, but that would just hide the true problem elsewhere.

Got to review all my changes now...



EDIT: I found my problem. After adding companions, I forgot (again, like last time) to change this line in initialize_npc:

(store_mul, ":string_addition", ":slot_addition", 16),

I had banner id errors on lord respawn. May not be related.

I seem to recall that when a lord gets defeated, on respawn, the system assigns a new banner to him?

A targeted/compatible version number would definitely help.

Hinotori 说:

There was a thread a while back that advocated the option of adding visible boundaries. I supported it and still do. Alternatively, some kind of warning when you're getting too far from the battle would work as well.

Next to trees, the map edges are my number one cause of fatality. 

点击展开...

I remember back in older versions the borders used to be an upward slope so you could clearly see where's off limit.
Wish a point release or mod can bring it back.

I wonder if you can cheat the realistic saving difficulty level with alt-tab and read-only file attribute from time to time.

No point at all, but just saying...

"User is on moderator watch list"

May be because you do not care for America? 

It happened to me before that I kept looking and looking and teleporting to all taverns but just couldn't find one of the companions. Turned out she WAS upstair (in Tihr IIRC)

Seen it in native, in one of those Swadian villages.

The_Excol 说:

One of my companions had knocked another one in the tournament, and advanced a level, in the middle of the fight

点击展开...

Really? I compare their experience points before and after and I never notice any difference.
And lords don't seem to gain renown.

May be it's already known, but you can do several couched lance attacks at once. Just aim at the head of the horse, don't hit the man on it, and the lance won't return to vertical position. Since enemy troops often line up nicely for you, this is a great way to de-horse enemy cavalry. My best record is 4.

Argh, I see it now, thanks.

I was under the impression that every line is a condition, and the next line will be executed only if the previous line succeeds.
Somehow that gets wrongly applied to the try else block...

I was just testing the syntax of change_screen_exchange_with_party, so I used $g_encountered_party.
What I was pointing out above is that (change_screen_exchange_members, 0|1) is not the same as (change_screen_exchange_with_party, $g_encountered_party).

With change_screen_exchange_members, I either get to exchange with the hero party on the world map, or with the town the hero's in (yea the town itself is also a party; not what I want but at least the function works)
But with change_screen_exchange_with_party, the exchange screen does not show at all. So I don't think this function still works in 0.960.

change_screen_exchange members defaults to the encountered party

点击展开...

Let me try to fake $g_encountered_party and see what happens...