搜索结果: *

Ah, that's what I thought. Others made it sound explicit, like there was a window were one said "Use these troops for this battle".

Does this count for NPCs? I've tried putting the "tracker/spotter" NPC (a woman iirc) at the bottom of the list, but she always shows up anyway. She's a crap fighter... so I'd rather she stayed away!

Sir Prince 说:

E-mail isn't stored on your computer...

点击展开...

Um, yes it is, if that's how your email client works. "Net" mail isn't, but many (most?) don't use that.

Archonsod 说:

Click somewhere near, then use space to advance time till the king has caught up.

点击展开...

Space bar? D'uho!!! Who knew... thanks as always!

Another question. Other thread at least imply that I can choose which troops will appear in a battle; ie, when fighting a bigger battle the entire force doesn't fight. It goes in "waves." How can I choose which troops show up in the next "wave"? Is there any way? How about a siege (haven't done it yet), is there a way to choose which troops participate? Thanks again!

No, not a glitch, just using this thread as my "ask a question rather than curse my stupidity" thread.

Is there a way to "follow" an allied war party without catching up to them? My party is faster than the King's, so if I click on his party I inevitably join it, go through the dialog, leave, rinse and repeat. But just clicking around to stay close I end up "pausing" the game when I reach the end point. Kind of a drag. I just want to follow him around without having to constantly click. Any way to do that?

Thanks... again!

Ahhh, ok. Read the "money" (or whatever it is), tag in the window and made an assumption. Thanks.

Rather than spam thread, just adding another newbie question here.

How can I transfer money into the chest in my castle? I open it, and use the resultant window to put items from my inventory into it. (Funny, can't store a horse in there...  ) But can't figure out how to move gold off my person and into the safety of my castle.

Thanks!

painhammer 说:

Also, is a lance any good on horseback?

点击展开...

After a couple of days in this game (bought it after hitting the level cap), all I can say is.... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Using a lance, "couched" (meaning as he said above, don't touch the attack button, just get up speed, and aim the horse) against footmen more often than not one shots them. No kidding. If my aim is true, they be dead...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Hot damn! Thanks!

(Bought it last night after getting stuck at L7.) 

Oh boy, Finns v. Russians. My money’s on the Finns!

As to the OP, the reason we didn’t do anything about Stalin while we did Hitler is, for an American, easy. Hitler’s Germany declared was on the United States of America on December 11, 1941. Stalin’s USSR did not declare war on us. Hence we fought the country that declared war on us.

As for the Blitzkrieg into the USSR, it didn’t fail, not at all. It succeeded in what it set out to do: destroy the Red Army. Rather it destroyed what German intelligence estimates had said was the strength of the RKKA. Those estimates were way under reality however.

Even so, the losses taken by the Soviets in the first four months of fighting should have knocked them out of the game. Hitler’s “whole rotten structure will crumble” idea. But it didn’t. The level of control of the people by the state was also underestimated by the Germans. As was the tenacity of the Soviet soldier when properly lead and equipped. So the structure didn’t collapse.

Anyway, blitzkrieg then (and now), isn’t about territory. It’s about destroying the enemy’s ability and will to fight with concentric attacks and deprivation of supply and communication. The move south by Army Group Center’s mobile forces south to trap and destroy the Soviets around Kiev was completely in keeping with the blitzkrieg idea. The original Barbarrossa clearly states that the goal is destroying the Red Army. Hitler himself was of the view that territory, including taking Moscow “is of no great importance.”

Just fired it up and... 

Thank you very much Mr. M.