搜索结果: *

FBohler 说:

zyad137 说:

Callum are you okay? Maybe he has some family problem or something.

点击展开...

Maybe some of his relatives are addicted to Bannerlord and he's making them go to rehab!

点击展开...

HUMMAN 说:

Just an indea, since game is in 'polishing' phase, sharing some information to modders in pre-beta and after that would enchance top mods.

点击展开...

Callum_TaleWorlds 说:

Not sure where we said beta would start after Gamescom. Please try not to jump to conclusions.

点击展开...

Breezy Tee 说:

I'd like for, in this matter particularly, more realistic approaches. So, better economics = better equipment, but your troops do not level up, they are just rich soft peasants/soldiers wanna be. The more wars your faction fights the more veterans it produces, and those should be high level troops. That would make for great gaming imho. Imagine that you join, let's say, the "Varangians", and so it happens that in your current play they were at war like crazy, so you get incredibly strong units, but, the fief you were given is poor as it can get due to being raided multiple times, now you have Rus-like ninjas under-equipped! A guy dressed like an militia peasant managing to wreak havok due to his "war experience".

On another scenario you are a "Swadian", but your troops only feast butter due to Harlaus, so you invest like crazy into economics, and become a fantastic medieval Trump-eske lord, now your peasants wear shiny armor! But you go on to face those warmongering "varangians", your army gets wrecked due to lack of experience.

I know it's a stretch, and I know it won't happen, but then again one can always imagine stuff, am I right!? 

点击展开...

monoolho 说:

Instead of a price increase, maybe showing all instances of the available item for different prices on the trade screen, so you can choose the cheaper/next best thing in the screen instead of the number artificially going up when you buy.

Not that i would care that much anyway, except when buying horses to make cavalry troops or buying bulk equipment for companions.

点击展开...

Roccoflipside 说:

zyad137 说:

okay nice blog  i still do not like the fact that price instantly go higher as soon as you purchase let's say a blacksmith has 3 of the same sword i want to buy all the three swords for me and my two companions why do i have to pay a different price for each one? why don't i take the three swords for 250 denars instead of 300?  at least if you gonna keep it do not say it's realistic because it isn't.

点击展开...

I agree with you, but the way Callum explained it does kind of make sense. Rather than being at one blacksmith's shop, you've gone to all three blacksmiths in the town and commissioned a sword from each one, as obviously three people working on their own project will yield better results than one man working on three. Since you've visited three different shops with three different owners, they all charge a different price for the work (which is realistic). All of this is abstracted into one screen, as having to go to three different shops in character could get tedious.

All that being said, now that they've explained it this way I almost feel that this has to be part of the game. For example, you go to the weapon trader screen and get the usual screen, but each item has a number, how many units of that item are for sale from that particular shop. Two arming swords, same stats, for sale from two different shops at two different quantities, say shop 1 has 20 for sale at 100 denars apiece, while shop 2 has 5 for sale at 125 apiece. You could then buy 5 swords from shop 1 at one time, paying the 100 denar price. However, as soon as the transaction occurs, the price change happens, which could cause shop 1's price to then exceed shop 2, meaning if you then wanted to buy one more sword you would want to go to that one.

But that's just me being nitpicky I think

点击展开...

NPC99 说:

Thanks for showng the policies screen. However, I’m puzzled on how a player can subvert his own kingdom and take control of it. There didn’t seem to be anything in these kingdom screens to achieve that.

Presumably, the clans can vote to expell the player’s clan from the kingdom as well - that should keep us on our toes. 

点击展开...

Rabies 说:

Noudelle 说:

Rabies 说:

I'd be interested to know what happens when a clan is expelled or has a fief revoked by popular vote among their peers. Do they just have to accept the decision, with their property instantly being transferred to the ruler? Or can they reject the verdict, and defend their holdings from repossession, maybe calling in sympathetic clans within the faction to join their cause?

The latter is how it works in Crusader Kings 2, and can lead to long and damaging civil wars within a realm - which is quite a lot of fun.

点击展开...

I'd be extremely disappointed if that isn't the case.

点击展开...

The thing is, it might cause problems with other mechanics. I believe it's previously been stated that lords can garrison troops in any castle or town that belongs to their faction. So if Lord Monchug has some troops stationed in Lord Akrum's castle and then Lord Akrum's clan is voted out of the faction, but he rebels and raises arms against the Khuzaits, thereby keeping hold of the castle until they can take it off him by force, what happens to those troops belonging to Lord Monchug that are garrisoned there (assuming Monchug fights for the Khuzait loyalists)?

点击展开...

Lord Engineer 说:

How about they keep the red wall, reduce the transparency, and maybe saturation, and once a player crosses the wall both start to increase? then the barrier wouldn't clash as much, a player would have a good indicator of how much time they have left (apart from the timer, obviously), and it would still be easy for a player to navigate their way back to where they're supposed to be.

点击展开...