搜索结果: *

I'm not a big fan of those land thieves, but that was a great job!

FBohler 说:

Some guy just claimed only 5 people are working on BL right now, I wonder if they have enough workforce to implement anything other than the strictly necessary to the game for being release in EA.

点击展开...

Wot in tarnation. Are you just trolling? Please, tell me this is just a joke.

I don't think it will happen. It would be too costly for TW and we haven't heard anything about a full dubbing.

By the Pope! I just had an orgasm! I wonder if those are some baby steps toward real formations.

The diagonal lines can probably be turned on and off.

I don't play multiplayer, but I think It will probably die. Even though people have a lot of complaints about Bannerlord multiplayer, mods are going to make it better than Warband multiplayer.

What about losing 15-25% of the proficiencies and only one in power draw and power strike?

FBohler 说:

Where did I ask for the troops to become unusable when out of stamina? Stats debuff and morale drop would be totally fine for me.

点击展开...

What if the units lost half of their proficiencies, half of their power strike and half of their power draw? Would that be a good penalty?

Even if the game is not designed to use that system, couldn't they try to change it?

What if they added a new command called "march" that would make your units walk slower to not lose/recover stamina? This would give the player a lot more control of his units stamina.

By the way, I'm not really a big fan of reducing the amount of arrows the horses archers have(assuming that it's not extremely high). And making horses more fragile? That sounds bad to me. I know this is one of those cases of realism x gameplay, but horses should be difficult to kill(in my opinion). The other options of balancing cavalry are fine to me, moreover, the devs don't need to use only one or two of those options, they could use the stamina system+make horse archers less accurate+reduce the penetration power of cavalry against infantry, or any other combination that they want.

NUQAR'S Kentucky "Nuqar" James XXL 说:

There is no feasible way to force the player to keep all the horse archers or cavalry in a cohesive unit, but at the same time it would be impossible for the player to keep track of 100 individual stamina levels, making it impossible to make informed decisions about how to avoid low stamina, thus making stamina more of a randomised debuff in the player's perspective. Bannerlord just isn't this kind of game.

点击展开...

I was talking specifically about horses, but since people are expanding the idea to infantry as well, I will too.

When you press backspace, you can see how many units you have and some general orders. What if that menu also showed the overall stamina level of the troops? The game would still calculate the individual stamina level of each unit, but you would only see the big picture. This way you could make informed decisions to avoid low stamina, for example, if the "stamina bar" was depleted you wouldn't order your units to just charge. And about the cohesive unit part, I think formations would solve that problem, e.g. making cavalry use wedge, infantry a shield wall, etc.

FBohler 说:

A solution to cater the community would be adding stamina to NPC troops while players and AI lords would keep the "infinite stamina" feature.

This would make the formations behave cautiously to not waste stamina without undermining the combat gameplay.

点击展开...

Yep, I agree with everything.

FBohler 说:

It would be nice to see terrain affecting morale.

For example:

- Wet terrain such as rivers;
- Fighting from lower ground;
- Climbing up a hill (temporary morale drop for unmounted troops in this case);

点击展开...

Shouldn't mounted troops also receive a penalty? I'd imagine that charging uphill, even with a horse, would be pretty bad.

A full year is a lot of time, I was hoping that it would be more like six months. C'est la vie, I guess.

Does anyone know if a devblog will be published today?

I still wonder why they didn't add real formations to the game. Was it because they wanted the game to appeal to a wider audience?

Will we be able to tell our troops to focus on attacking a specific type of enemy units? For example telling our cavalry to focus on the enemy archers?

Why are people so on edge on lately?