搜索结果: *

Wolfsblut 说:

That is the only way to not be disappoint really.
When i read some posts with "after all this time only EA"-complaints my fur raises.
Either you wait another 1-2 years or you will get an unfinished, buggy mess.

And that is what early access is for.
Its not for buying and playing half way finished games, EA means you are paying to play an alpha/beta... its fine if someone
think thats a retarded thing to do, but it is what it is.
I don't know why so many people (specially on steam) have problems to understand that.
People have all the right to hate it, but doing it themselves and then complain about it is
so plain stupid that it should hurt.
Alot.

Is it downloadtime yet?

点击展开...

I mean, a lot of Developers have abused that system as well and it's made a lot of people very jaded towards the EA Program. Yes, it's not for "completed games" but they are supposed to be functional games and there have been many games which were snuck in to the EA program that were not, or they misrepresented their progress and current features which are all things Steam tells them not to do. So it's not like customers on Steam don't have a right to be angry at some games and their developers. (Not saying this applies with M&B, especially when reading their EA Announcement post they reaaaaaaaaaally go out of their way to mentioned multiple times the state of M&B II, which a lot of devs don't do)

Hey there,

I am located on east coast america, I didn't think it was a server issue as I've been playing with my brother who is also east coast and he has yet to crash.

I've done a couple games with 100+ on other servers and so far no crashes, it seems to only happen to me on 84e which is breaking my heart lol

Hey there,

Had M&B for a couple years, finally got Warband and NW, I love the 84E server, but for some reason I crash on this server only all the time.........I cant figure it out


I dont have any problems on the other servers, its only 84e. Am I missing something???

i vote to add tactical nukes, will completely settle the OP archers issue...........my 2c....


as for bdodigs post.....


Im pretty sure the armor Im wearing weighed less if not the same as what they wore back then, your high if you are going to tell me people of the body type / build of that period could run "preeety fast" with armor on.....

Im a recon scout and in better shape than 90% of soldiers and I can tell you theres very few people who can run fast in kit for more than 100m and then not be spent. So i dont buy that little dudes of that time period were ninja sprinting around in kit with all the crap they used to carry and wear....

of course i agree with you on the whole un-likely tactic of trying to "kite" infantry units around historically....i didnt read every page of the thread but I hopse someone wasnt suggesting that is why Archers didnt use heavier armor.....im sure it was more of an issue of

1. Cost - Scale+ qual. armor had to cost a pretty penny to make in large quantity..
2. Use - If you were going to field that kind of armor to your unit, would you rather give it to your infantry that is going to be in direct contact for certain, or your Archers which if the battle goes proper, will at most only see Counter-Fire......

my 2c.....again

I completely agree, its one of the few things that absolutely infuriates me about this game, especially since I usually play Vaegir, it makes my life a living hell....