搜索结果: *

Mr.Milker 说:

Harkon Haakonson 说:

Yeah, actually. 60-70$ is ridiculous for a game, be it on PC or console.

If anything, they should be progressively cheaper. 30$ is still quite some money.

点击展开...

Who judges that? You know, if I knew I was getting one good game for that much, I'd pay the money. I buy many games in bundles and on sale, but many of them aren't very good.
60 USD is a lot of money for me, roughly two weeks of food. (or half my rent)
Still, if I knew the game was good and that I'd sink some 30-50 hours into it, I'd happily pay that. Heck, I bought my first game ever, NHL 1997, for 75 USD (which used to be more than it is now of course). I saved up, for a few months. And then I spent at least a year playing it constantly. Money well spent, if you ask me.

Why should games get cheaper? They ARE becoming more and more costly to make. I realize the gaming market is probably growing and there's more of an audience to reach. Still, gaming studios aren't exactly swimming in profits, you have to stick to a rigid formula and flood the development in money to make a maybe-hit.

点击展开...

Ithilien5 说:

You make it seem like you're an expert. Please stop.

点击展开...

LordFalcon666 说:

-Permanent death (if you don't surrender fast enough) would be a nice feature for, let's say, "Hardcore mode" , i can only sympethise with that idea.
Maybe something like that could even be integrated in some kind of small multiplayer-progression/ladder mode, where equipment can be earned, but death means loosing all.

-New MP-modes would be nice too. Like a "Gungame-Battle" where you spawn every round you killed an enemy, with a better weapon, with the goal to be the first to kick someone to death (which would be the last level, to win the mode and than mapchange). Not authentic, but surely something to attract the masses... Or a tournament mode with randomgenerated duell-partners in arenas.

- Hacking your enemies bodyparts away is a nice idea but would lead to a higher age-rating. See Chivalry with the PEGI of 18.
So, from a sales-viewpoint, it's quite a bad idea (but i trust in the modding community  ) And there is the decision Gore vs. Battlesize. Hacked bodyparts must use some kind of physix = cpu usage. I'd rather prefere 200 more fighers in the field for the performance down, than seeing arms and legs fly... well... mostly... in the long run... after beeing very sadistic for a while.

点击展开...

TheFlyingFishy 说:

The problem with that is that, if you're playing on the, "realistic," save option, you misclick and have made an enemy of the whole town for life. Like I do in Skyrim.

Also, I love your signature, Ron. That's the one episode of Rugratz I can remember.

点击展开...

Ron Shady 说:

Yes hello

This is what i want:

walk into a tavern, see people sitting and drinking and laughing and singing and maybe fighting

And then i stab someone (everyone in the tavern and everywhere else too should be killable) and then everyone goes crazy and reacts to it

Yes

点击展开...

Inanch-Bilge 说:

"Development of this kind is incremental and behaviours need to be gradually corrected and improved over time, to include new actions. An example of this is ambushing. The mechanic and gameplay of ambushing itself needs to be developed but for a real implementation into the game, the AI needs to be programmed to make sure that lord and bandit parties also make use of ambushing in realistic ways. This adds extra layers to the development of a non-linear game like Mount&Blade, obviously creating complications but a necessary part of creating the games that we want to create and our players enjoy."

From third blog entry.

点击展开...

Red_Lancer 说:

The Rhodoks need war wagons 

点击展开...

Rokker 说:

Id just like to see it all in one battle, that would be cool. Win the wall, lead your troops down to the keep, win that win the castle

点击展开...

doguso 说:

Please make sieging castles WAY more interesting, varied, and controllable!  That's the one bit I didn't like about the first series, especially with the predetermined siege weapons (especially as ladders suck).

Maybe also make all the siege weapons have to be placed during the battle instead of the ladders already being set up.

点击展开...

Rokker 说:

The Dark Robin 说:

The fact is that it takes a lot of work to implement dual wielding, and even more to make the ai use it. This is a huge workload for something that is:
a) Popular among only about one third to half of the community
b) Not historically accurate
c) Will not benefit someone except in one-one duels


So, if someone were to just give them all the resources needed for duel wielding, (including the ai coding) then I'm sure they would include it. But, considering the questionable benefits for a huge workload, I would say that they will not include dual wielding, and they would be right not to. Even once they've polished Bannerlord to an extreme, (which it probably won't be anyway) their time would be better spent on new quests, gameplay, and other features than dual wielding. This is why they won't, and shouldn't include duel wielding.

点击展开...

+1 i rather have quests other than "fetch 10 cattle" than have duel wielding by farrrrrr

点击展开...

Rokker 说:

i dont know were the tonfas originated from, Asia i presume?
Hook swords, from Asia, witch represents no faction in calradia atm
and katars, like sarranid infantry needs to be more handy capped by getting a knife.
I cant think of any troops that wielded duel weapons and are represented in calradia, aside from berserkers, and really they only got drugged up and killed a bunch of priests before they ran into a spear.

点击展开...

SkyTime 说:

If I may, for the love of god talos, please redo the Great Hall from Mount&Blade version god knows what.

Feeling.jpeg

隐藏

The song if someone wasn't aware of it. Actually make that most of the older songs from M&B-

点击展开...