Roccoflipside 说:
Mr.EmjeR 说:
“I draw much of my inspiration from medieval TV shows and movies."
This is exactly why history based creations never improve in terms of historical value. It's basically a century long game of telephone. People base there work on the interpretation of the interpretation of the interpretation of the interpretation of someone who once looked at actual history references.
In my work I do the opposite, I look at the history books, reconstructions and papers first, and after that at movies and tv shows to help fill in the gaps or make it more artistic...
Sigh..
What kind of work do you do? I agree that history is always viewed through filters, btw, just wondering what job keeps you in such close contact with history.
I create historical VR experiences, games and animations for museums and Heritage organisations. I come from a game background, and I very much try to bridge the gap between the traditionally boring bad looking reconstructions, and the interesting but often unground games and movies.
DtheHun 说:
TV shows, movies, video games are not for education, never was. To sell it must appeal to the crowd. Just look at Robin Hood interpretations coming in every 10 years, how the fashion and values of the days of Richard the Lionheart changes retrospectively.
You are correct. but you are mistaken in the idea that entertainment based on history has not much appeal, and can't sell. It's understandable, since it has barely been tried. The thing is that there are barely any people who know how to make appealing interesting stuff, that know about history or how to research properly. And on the other side the people that do know about the history don't know how to make appealing stuff. and those two groups rarely work together.
Take for example modern war movies. lets look at Dunkirk for example. if we ignore the story for a bit, we can see that everything is pretty authentic. Is the movie less appealing because airplanes don't have 4 wings or are not made of glass?
I'm not saying I want all the movies to be historical movies. And i'm also not arguing with your point that time a movie is made can have and maybe should have influences of that time in it. Yes Robin hood of today can look different than robin hood frm 10 years ago. The problem that I have an issue with is that those robin hoods are not different interpretations of the source material, but they are interpretations of each other.
Lets say I want to make a movie about a greek war, and i want it to be fantasy. What i can do is take a look at Troy or 300, take their designs and change them again to make my own ideas. Which means my work will be an interpretation of an interpretation of an interpretation. and the end result has likely nothing to do with the greeks anymore.
OR I can read some history books, watch some historical artworks, some documentaries (have some issues as well) and create my fantasy work as well, the end result is an original fantasy interpretation that probably has a lot more to d with the greeks directly and I don't fall in the trap of clichés.
I don't expect movies/games/books to be educational, but I do expect their makers to be educated in whatever their subject is based on. They should do the boring research to give you a very original entertaining work.
In terms of games The witcher and Kingdom come are very entertaining appealing games and they went the route of doing actual source research. This is why it saddens me to learn that my most favorite game has Hollywood as their inspiration and source instead of History.