搜索结果: *

I'm pretty sure they talked about this engine stuff before ...

578 说:

Does anybody genuinely reads these with excitement anymore? I havent read their last 3 blogs, just looked at the images and closed the window. Give us a new gameplay video, this is retarded.

点击展开...

I do the same.

Cale 说:

Early medieval horses were smaller then what you'd expect to see in most games/art as war horses aren't bred until later in the medieval period.

Check out Welsh Mountain Cobb, Dartmoor Pony and Icelandic Pony to get an idea of horses from Western Europe of around this period.

点击展开...

Eastern horses could get quite big, ever hear of a Nisean horse? The Eastern Roman Empire would have had access to big horses too. What you are taking about are native horse breeds northern Europe, but there were more than just those.

Give me a gameplay video or give me death

Boring blog, why not post a video or something for once? We've seen no footage of the game for 6 months.

Not much in this one. The particles are cool but most of it is just "Is this feature better than it was in Warband?" "Yes this feature is better than it was in Warband"

Please please give us more. How about some videos? Some custom battles maybe?

I hope AI personalities are somewhat randomised. Like in one game the king of the Sturgeons will be one way, next time you play he will be a little different.

Auldman 说:

Oh dear. That doesn't sound like they are even remotely close. You should have already nailed down a main quest at this point in the production. Yeesh.

点击展开...

I would imagine in a game line Bannerlord the main quest is one of the last things you do. You need to get the world built, and all the mechanics and the models done first. It's not like Witcher or Skyrim where the story dictates the content, more like the other way around.

578 说:

Oh look more recruits having pointless discussions about realism because they don't understand that MnB is not a historical game. You want realism? Go play Kingdom come: Deliverance.

点击展开...

Yeah, that's the charm of MnB, they don't have to follow history completely and can change things to make the game more interesting or to make gameplay better!

Thanks again for your weekly blog posts, it makes me look forward to thursdays

The only thing better would be a release date!

What are you saying there are no Nords? There are.

They are mixed with the Vaegirs to make one faction called Sturgia. Nords will make up most of their infantry and they will also have a sub faction that is entirely Nordic.

Nords are going to be in the game, they'll be a major part of one faction instead of a faction of their own. They also hinted in this blog that they might have an expansion in the future to add the Nord homeland to the game.

Anyone who is familiar with the lore should know that Nords didn't come to Calradia in force until after the Empire fell. Right now they appear as adventurers and mercenaries but there is no Nord state on the continent of Calradia. That's the lore like it or not, their part in the Sturgian faction should be enough.


Personally the Nords were always my least favourite faction in Warband anyway. Their armies suck because they have no cavalry and their existence totally clashes with the high medieval appearance of the other factions.

In the blog they said:

"the Nordlands are off of the map (for the present, anyway)"

Does that mean there will be a future map expansion DLC? and it will add in the Nord homeland which is across the sea and outside Calradia? That is VERY interesting.

This game is set historically from around the time of the dark ages up to 12th century so no, tournaments would not have been a thing then.

But really does it matter so much? They were an important thing in Warband and I wouldn't like to see them cut out a cool feature. Also the historical timeline in Warband was more than a little fishy, like they had vikings from the dark ages mixed in with Saracans from the Crusades and Italians from the high middle ages. I'm sure Bannerlord will be equally ambiguous.

What about having different events in tournaments too? Like you could have melee, jousting and archery.

Melee: Everyone fights in a big mosh pit.
Jousting: You charge at each other with a lance to knock them out in elimination rounds.
Archer: Shooting targets highest score wins the round.

Lord Milky 说:

Rackie 说:

One of the features I hope to see an improvement in is Turnaments.
I nevet liked the ones in native m&b and in warband, but Im not either a big fan of how many mods do it (you can choose equipment, upgrade, how many players/teams and so on), that felt like cheating.

I would really want a good turnament system that is harder than in Warband with a bigger reward.
Also jousting turnaments coulf be a good thing in turnaments, or if its to hard to make a good AI for it, atleast put it in Multiplayer


Ps: can/will you make a blog about turnaments in bannerlord?

点击展开...

I think this is a really good idea. Tournaments need to be harder , A unique weapon or armour piece that is only attainable in the competition as well as a payout. The top tier match , the Ai needs to be really difficult and challenging. That way a tournament is more rewarding if you succeed.

点击展开...

Also there should be fewer tournaments, but make them a big deal like you said.

They should be massive world cup type events which are challenging and hugely rewarding. But maybe only have them every 3 months or something?

Tournaments are fun the first couple of times in warband but then they get repetitive and easy and kind of pointless since you only make like 500 gold.

Cpt.Braca 说:

Blead 说:

Yes, If you get hit in the head twice than both your eyes will be sliced out and your screen will turn black. This is not an error in the game, your character just turned blind.

点击展开...

So spend lots on a quality helmet, oh but wait, I suppose if I were really clumsy I could lose a leg, then I'd have to simply hop everywhere? Or my arms?

What about my internal organs? Or an arrow through the head? Brain damage, now I'm stuffed! 


Merely a thought that repeated wounds or damage could be permenant, if people want permadeath half the time why not perma-injury?

点击展开...

Could be pretty frustrating. What if you got both of your legs broken and then the fighting moved on before anyone killed you. You would be stuck where you were for the rest of the game.

desidas 说:

The Bowman 说:

Callum, if you are reading this, please consider this suggestion: after you died in a battle, make it so you can play a board game of your choice with other dead players waiting for the next round. This would be so useful between rounds in battle and invasion modes.

点击展开...

THIS!

点击展开...

Huh, I never thought of that but it's a good idea. The main thing that stopped me from playing certain game mode was the long waiting times between battles. If there was a mini game or maybe training against AI opponents or whatever then that would be great.

Pretty clear answer to me. Multiplayer is going to be BIG, even bigger than some of the modded multiplayer matches for Warband.

SHAME

You can eat when the game is finished guys 

Lol I love how a blog post about Vlandians resulted in a 4 page discusison on Sturgians. Does anyone have anything to say about the blog post?

I think they sound good, but might be a little OP. They are basically the Rhodoks and Swadians rolled into one faction.