Cleaning Agent 说:
Same thing. If you can't afford a new car, it doesn't mean you physically don't have the cash, it means you could buy it but need to spend the cash on more important things.
What was it you said again? Reading comprehension?
If you say so. Of course, by that logic, I'd never have money to put towards entertainment, since I'd always have more important things I could be spending it on.
a) The point still stands. You were under no obligation to post your personal financial situation, and by doing so you were opening it to criticism.
b) And if you're gonna follow that logic, you can put the time towards something more important too.

I don't see why it's that hard to understand.
Fine, criticize my finances all you want.
And thanks for reiterating what I also said.
And playing games is really being with your family.
My son sits in my lap while I play, and he also has a controller in his hands playing with that.
But that's not really the point is it? The point was to try for a cheap stab.
a) Finding a job would mean leaving education, which is a really great way to increase your life total of money earnt isn't it...

b) I doubt you can survive on 3 hours a night and remain sane for long...
c) If your money can go towards more important things, why can't your time? If it ain't more work, it could be something more constructive than gaming.
a) No it wouldn't. I go to school and work full time. I also work with someone that's a
full time student that works full time.
b) Than medical professionals are wrong. Of course, it depends on the person. I did it for 3 months straight.
c) I didn't say it couldn't. But your arguing that I should be doing something other than what you're doing. That's called
hypocrisy.
It's also called a budget. I'm meeting all my needs, and I have money left over for emergency reasons. I'd prefer to save my money rather then spend it.
That's your opinion isn't it... Personally I never mentioned it being stupid to get games for free, I just pointed out flaws in your story about your money problems.
My story was a matter of perspective, as I stated from the very beginning. There's no flaws. I stated that I'd rather spend nothing than something, namely because I'd rather put my money towards more important things. How is it flawed?
Because I'm entertaining myself instead of working more? Your entire logical statement would be flawed for the exact same reason, since you're not doing the same. It's pretentious as hell.
Wikipedia is a crap source for anything pop-culture because people edit it to say what they believe to be the case. The definition of "Troll" on wikipedia isn't necessarily the best definition of troll (indeed it's a crap one, since it basically defines any debate as trolling) it's just what the last person to edit thought was a good definition.
A generally accepted rule for a troll is the use of insults however, which I'll note you've used liberally.
The term troll comes from fishing. It quite literally means to bait.
It's apparent that your intent was to bait me into this "discussion". If that weren't so, than you never would have bothered coming back to this topic after your post, since you obviously have no interest in Goozex's offer. The fact that you did return, and continue to do so, is very telling in your original purpose with your post.
You baited, I bit. You trolled. I'm a hooked fish.
Insults have nothing to do with it.
Counter?