搜索结果: *

RobustTurd 说:

I was just wondering whether that blog contained the future plans all the way to release. Apparently yes.

点击展开...

FlowDream 说:

True, when we say about feasts, we care about immersion which BL lack much now. We hope that TW do more to improve immersion in the future, such as feasts and another things.

点击展开...

Bazza_ov_da_Norf 说:

It's not "essential" but I do wish TW cared more about immersion gameplay factors. Lack of feasts, bandits parties arbitrarily getting bigger depending on player clank rank (immersion breaking, awful for caravans), lack of depth to relationships/politics, lack of reasons to explore the very nice scenes, general lack of things to be doing outside of war war and sometimes WAR.

Like I said its not essential, but its disappointing that TW don't seem to care much about these elements that are the heart & soul of creating an immersive world that the player can get lost in. Hopefully the mod community can flesh out most of these aspects in time.

点击展开...

Bloc 说:

That's not what I asked though - not directly. I always asked for Procedural Battle terrain. I explained why I think it's the only proper solution for this mess in many other threads before so I won't explain again.

I think you are referring to this discussion where Piconi said he would like to have something like this, and I told him that it's possible but also saying

And I thought it could be done as a mod until TW decides to take any action on this. We didn't even suggest that as a suggestion to Dejan if I'm not mistaken.

I'm pretty sure no one would say anything if they had plans like "We know that battle maps are not sufficient right now but we will bring procedural generation before the release" but instead they choose to continue with this extremely inefficient battle terrain system, and they decided to do that while one of the core functionality of the game is broken ( Sieges )
Now you can say "Sieges are AI issue not scene" but that's not entirely the case, since they claimed that it's also a scene issue. If they had plans to have procedural generation, then the engine team or any other team that is not environment artists, would pick this task and start working on it while environment artists were working on fixing the scene issues of sieges to make them less unplayable. So at the end you would have a proper battle terrain and also semi-fixed and/or finished town scenes.
But with this approach now they piled tons of work to environment artists. They have to fix scene issues on Sieges, they have to create more towns, villages, castles, and they have to create battle maps for 150 regions ( and some of the existing maps are already hilariously simplistic and low-quality ) - so if they will make a sloppy job, it will result in really bad and terrible battle terrain at the end.

But in the end, literally every solution, including this terrain system, would be better than what we currently have. So I'm okay with this as long as they can make it properly ( which I, unfortunately, don't have faith in because it seems like maps are scaled down too much in terms of real/map ratio )
"Lets have maps and pick them randomly based on type" is one of the laziest decision TW took and whoever suggested this should reconsider his knowledge in game design because it's not just lazy but also completely against to Game UX principles.

点击展开...

MadVader 说:

You are playing the game in a wrong way and have to be corrected. It's like eating a pizza, but you are only eating the pineapple and throwing away the rest. Stop eating the pineapple! And why are you eating a pineapple pizza anyway? Disgusting.


It's too complex to make a good tactical AI that wouldn't fall for some stupid exploit or another. I would expect formation AI mods to be at about the Warband mod level. Not great, not terrible.

点击展开...

• Frog poison can be used to add the poisoning effect of the weapon.
• Charcoal can be used to increase the metalness of the weapon.
• Feathers can be used to increase the wood attribute of the weapon
• Leather can be to improve the bludgeon damage of the weapon (shown as a skin hammer or leather gripper).
• Ductile steel can improve the length or size of the weapon, etc.

FlowingJade 说:

Cant believe I missed this thread. I made one on this very topic March last year maybe some of you gentlemen (and women) have seen it. I also did a poll and most people did want it "Freelancer" to be implemented (Either by TW or modders) and also for it to be fleshed out more.

My thread (containing my suggestions if you are curious)

https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?threads/bannerlord-2-freelancer-overhaul.394951/

What is described on this thread is definitely akin to the Freelance Mod we had for Warband with a few exceptions such as the credit system. I'm glad to see interest in this feature has not waned and share your desire for it to be developed at some point in time. @FlowDream

As for other people's the concerns about prolonged periods of inactivity the suggestion here of your lord actively giving you quests during that down time - combined with the context dependant scenarios idea I had, can spice things up and reduce such periods.

There's ways to further improve of this feature as well. It will take a competent devteam and some brainstorming but there is certainly ways to build on it.

To those who only see this feature as a detriment to the game:

I disagree very much with that opinion. This feature allows for a natural development of your character into leadership positions in a way that flows well and complements Bannerlords sandbox design.

Hence I personally believe it would serve to enhance the Bannerlord experience as it is very rational (and fun for me) to start off as a grunt, work your way up to an elite soldier, eventually become a captain of an elite squad, then go on to become second in command of the army controlling more units and then at a time of your choosing decide to become a lord controlling you own party. (This is not exactly how Freelancer worked but it is how I would like Freelancer 2.0 to work)

The option of rising to become a leader of men this way as opposed to going to a village and hiring people (which is total fine too) is very much appealing to me. This feature capitalises on the "here you go, now forge your own path" design that TW establishes in the franchise.

It further adds variety for roleplay and character development pathways (how you make a living, interact with the worlds systems to get prestige and power) and fits Bannerlord - a game in which wars and battle have a prominent role. So I must admit I'm surprised by how some feel like its a sacrilegious and improper feature suggestion.

However, I get that people have their own unique perspective on things, different strokes for different folk and so on and so forth. So lets have that mutual respect and not relegate each others views into an undeserved category just because It doesn't interest you personally.

点击展开...