搜索结果: *

You can die in battle. Its a setting at start of a game who is immune to death in battle:
- Your clan(you, familly and companions)
- Your Clanmembers(You and familly)
- You(Only you)
- Nobody

This setting unfortunatly cant be changed after game is started :/

But.. Despite I play "Nobody", I have never died in battle. It takes a bit to kill a lord in battle. I rarely see it in battles not simulated to be honest(Where main player never don't participate).

darkstar48507 说:

ive heard (though i could be wrong) that you can play your child if you die.

点击展开...

You will get a dialogue where you pick next player charachter among adult clanmembers(Not companions). IE you will never play an underaged child but you might play your siblings or kids if they manage to grow up.

darkstar48507 说:

1) speed up the day/night cycle, wars should take many years with only a few lasting a month or so. it should also take a good chunk you your life moving up the political ladder so to speak

点击展开...

I´d rather have more main - quests telling me WHY I can speed-climb that ladder. Low-level game is so hallow and repetetive.

darkstar48507 说:

2) there should be risk in battle, if you are below 10% health and the finishing blow is 50% of your total you die, if any hit is 2x your total you die

点击展开...

Whould love increased death with more options on above list(of who is Immune to death)

- You (Up to level 10)
- You (Up to level 20)

I´d hate to be forced to play elder big brother over an unlucky bandit encounter. It would likely be a campaign-killer for me.

Whould love a 4th skill on Vigor "Battle Survival". With increased death risk AI would die as flies but with this skill this could be countered for core charachters. All pers would be "Personal". Then only bad AI charachters(including yours!) would die as flies!

darkstar48507 说:

3) wars should only be proposed by lords only if you are in UP TO 2 wars, if you as the ruler want to be in more than you can start them

点击展开...

More love to the war votings, yes absolutly! But my problem (with votes over all) is that vassals are very united! Hive-minded! They thinks and votes the same to 90% There are rarely even votes. They know the odds. They know the king will have to veto it before they trigger the vote. I´d like more divided vassals where opinion and realtion toboth initializer and liege matters. And above all, traits. AI vassals should have an option where they "Support the king" for 50% influence cost. They choose it if they have no strong opinion for any option and likes the liege.

Elite noble units is too cheep and too easy to get. They should be more valuable. Loosing them and replacing them should be alot more expensive and hard than replacing 30 times the number of elite regulars. And a elite regular should be ten times harder to replace than rurrent...

I´ll give this suggestion of mine a second moment of fame in the spotlight

Albastı16 说:

Please god no, player is already getting suffocated by freebies at the beginning of the game and now we want for game to also give a free house as well as if its already not giving out enough stuff for free?

点击展开...

Comparing to what? Football Manager where you can get a football team worth billions of dollars? Or plague Inc where you can get a completly halmless virus - embreo?

There are probably mods for starting naked and 0 gold.

The start equipment is somewhere inline with what a recruit have - worth 200-300 denars maybe. And a pack - horse worth 100 denars when scarse. 1000 denars in purse. And a level 0 clan. And a family of 3 siblings. One too good to utilize in several years and hard to develop. 2 you cant utilize or develop in several years. I´d appriciate the adult brother more if he was level 5, honestly, with matching skill levels.

There is the the sandbox start if you don't want the family.

From my perspective a house or a home is mainly a flavour thing. It does not give income. where you can gather your familly members if you need to speak to them and dont want to run around the map. Where you can requip for example caravanleaders etc.

Later in the game, you could invite clanlords to your home/capital to speak to them. Or invite mercenarycaptains. Or other people of interest you don't want to run around the map after.

Earlier I saw it as a the place where defeated bandleaders regroup. Now it´s easier just calling them to my band wherever I am on the map.

of dey Riyn 说:

First one about heirs. About their skills.

Characters born after starting the campaign grow one time and become full part of the game. From this moment they are able to lead parties, be governors etc. BUT most of them either warriors with, OK, few advanced combat skills or just useless persons with no abilities. Of course, not all of them should become overlords of Calradia. But looking back and reminiscing the state of lords in the early beginning of the campaign... it makes you a little upset cause next generation is worse (?), at least less useful comparing to first one. We have some badass persons in each culture from the start, why not to create few same ones after?

Would be nice to rework this and add heirs some more skills from the moment they grow out of childhood.

点击展开...

Agree! They often have great potential, gets massive xp for what they do BUT AI lords are not doing that much stuff! Many lords could get 150 skill from the focus/atrributes they have from start but to get there takes time! And AI picks the best suited lord when creating a new party/assigning governors. Highest current score and does never check potential. I have seen 30 year old such charachter with huge potential but stuck on level 1 because AI never use them because they allways have better options.

My solution: Bring youths to map earlier(at age 16 but they cant lead parties and they cant govern holdings untill 1. Set them as "Squires" in armies or beside governornors. The teatchers skill is used but half the unmodified XP is awarded the squire. This means the next gen will be better prepered!

of dey Riyn 说:

Now about how game determines who to give fiefs to. Played for different kingdoms, different versions of the game, in each faction there are couple of clans who eager to grab each fief the kingdom conquered. Even ruling clan is not so greedy. There is some logic I noticed like, of course, quantity of fiefs, location of new fief (if it’s close to candidate’s area), relationships with the ruler and voting lords. BUT it’s broken too often, usually there are same persons at the elections and no logic in how they were proposed. As a result, 3-4 clans (with the ruling one) possess most of lands while there are could be clans even without a single city under control. Unable to make smth with this as a vassal, not ruler.

点击展开...

Yes. And the worst part is generation the candidates! Now you are there if you have no fiefs or nearby fiefs
1. there should be more than 3. Increase to a maximum of five!!
2. First candidate is allways the king/ruler!
3. Second - forth candidate candidates are the 3 with least holdings and most poverty.
4. Fifth is allways the one conquering

Then let nomenated clans decide to accept nomination by paying some influence(King does it for free, conquerer pay some extra). The accepting is listed. Things clans consider when accepting/declining:
1. Do I have enough suitable governors to handle my fiefs(including this)?
2. Is it close to my other fiefs?
3. Can I afford to spend influence on my own vote?
4. ...

Then the voting! today vassals tend to vote exactly the same. I want divercity!!
1. Make relation matter more!
2. Make traits matter more!
3. Make distance to the clans other holdings matter more!
4. Strategy. Consider both internal and external espects.
5. ...

This would likely mean more fiefs to the ruler. But then he can hand them out to whoever he finds fit(Depending of his traits, relations and strategic needs of the realm - mainly external)!

saittam 说:

A village seem more likely in the game. Getting uniqe quests from that village. Help with the protection. Free recruits. Leaving companions on buildning tasks.

点击展开...

Yes, depending of your background choices

Great idea!

What do you mean with a "house" really? What is it you suggest we should have? A building in a random town town of our culture? What should it do? What should it be used for?
Anything close to this suggestion of mine?
Base of Operation

GrayingGamer 说:

If a SP achievement is unattainable in MP, it's because it's LITERALLY unattainable - you don't have children or execute lords in MP. That makes sense.

On the other hand, there are all sorts of activities that you DO in SP, and the achievements just don't work for these. It just doesn't make sense. Especially when it's clear that the overwhelming majority of people who play the game are SP. There's actually a fair amount of confusion on the steam message boards because of this - "why isn't this achievement tracking??" and literally half the responses are people saying it's broken, because NO ONE does MP and they haven't realized that's where you can get it.

点击展开...

Is not achivement text like

"In skirmish mode"(Jack of all trades)
"in captain mode"(Butcher of Calradia)
"in multiplayer"(Roadkill)
"enemy player(s)"(This is Sparta, Ride it like you stole it, Catch, Strike!, Headhunter)

clear enough to desrcribe the purpose and make them LITTERALLY unattainable in SP?

"Slice n dice" and "Lance-a-lot" I agree is badly described - its litteraly unclear its MP only.

Generally the descriptive texts does not follow a clear pattern and could be improved/streamlined.

GrayingGamer 说:

People could still get the listed achievements in multiplayer, I'm just asking that they're not exclusively multiplayer. You ignored the "-only" part of my post and subject line.

点击展开...

But when 0% of single-player achievements can be solved in MP, why should MP achievements be solveable in SP?

Its a mixed game. To get your 100%, do both or live with it

I agree and would go with a static arbitrary fixed no of days before kingdom dissolves.

But to do it real, Id like:

Vassal Clans should start to leave a faction when they have no holdings. Meaning kingdom upbreak starts long before Kingdom has no holdings. Clans leave for independence. Game perfectly fine supports independent clans and them beeing recriuted back. In Warband, they got -1 with leader each day and left any random day after a certain treshold. It could be the same here. Or just a fixed no of days. I don't really care.

Kingdoms with only a rulerclan with no holdings dissolves after 5-10 days. Kingdom clan goes independent and all wars the kingdom had are terminated.

Independent clans may approach the player via the same system they ask player to be a mercenary or to swear fealty.

Independent clans have alot lower requirements to be recruited via bartersystem.

clans should be independent when the faction is destroyed. Not simply mass-deflecting. Independent clans are fully supported, look at rebel clans. They can be independent without a holding for like ages nefore recruited or destroyed.

Thank you @Forest-Bandit!
Hopefully some of them are read by devs but they very rarely comment on suggestions unfortunatly.

I also prefer not to use mods.

warbandbannerlord 说:

Birth right is a great idea. It would also give the player better direction when deciding who to marry (if they want to marry the heir to a powerful clan/kingdom or not)

点击展开...

Tryvenyal 说:

Marrying into a new clan resets the value to 1. They can succed the clan but not before anyone born into the clan.

点击展开...

Unfortunatly And when marrying into your clan, they leave their old clan anyway

Thank you!

I like this suggestion!

More headhunting of evil bastards! Brigands, deserters, banditlords, gangleaders and whatever vile fellows you can make up: Let us hunt and hang them!!

I fully agree with the issue. Battles are meaningless, a few battles and all of Calradia should realistically be uninhabited.

But I don't agree with the solution.

My solution is lots more expensive warbands - they should cost much more gold but also goods to keep in shape(Not only food horses and gold but equipment for sieges, tools, camps, smithing tools for creating and maintaining weapons and armor. Have created this suggestion for how I would like troop upgrades to work - and it´s really a simplification!)

A party that is not prepered to participate in an army, it probably not worth calling them to an army and definiatly not worth sending them!

Add a "Manpower" functionality where available recruits respawn rate slows down when they have been taken too frequently. My suggestion is to use "Militia" as the meassurment. Each time recruits are hired, take their number from militia. If Militia is "low" - recruits are not/very slowly respawning.

With "prepered" armies and "aware" factions, we can avoid too many of these slaughters.

Nice suggestion! I specially liked the part where you grouped merchants and Bandits together

Trying to revive this old suggestion Both Regency and Abdication is still features I´d like to see and none of them are very hard to implement as far as I can see.

A restriction I could imagine viable is blocking option to change to someone of higher level, like brother At least for Achievement games.

Great suggestion!
I´m happy with the lack of settlement - parts. Let it apply to clans that are permanent members of a faction so it exludes players[that takes that route], revolts and mercs.