搜索结果: *

So pumped for this!  And I love the time frame it's set in.

It doesn't affect me much either way because I always play as men, but I know there is at least one female NPC you can recruit into your party.  Doesn't this already conflict with the idea that women didn't have a place on the battlefield in this "historical" game?  I use the word historical loosely because, yeah sure maybe it's not a fantasy world but it's far from being realistic or historically pure by any measure.

I personally think they didn't put women in just because it saved them some time and resources on adding and/or changing content for female characters. 

I bought BECAUSE it will be "more of the same".  Too many game series progressively get more terrible these days.

Yes, those were cool animations.  I especially liked parrying with a shield.  It makes me very sad that there are those nice animations that aren't being used.  They really should be brought back.  The deeper the combat, the better.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

MadocComadrin 说:

Redo the terrain code with the same keys, but disable the no-grass option.

点击展开...

Sorry, but how do I go about doing that?  I'm still learning the ropes.

In one of my custom maps, the static grass is missing.  I do not have grass density turned down.  What should I do to get it back?  Thanks in advance.

I never follow tracks because it's too tedious.    I for one often find the need to follow tracks though.  Either when I'm tracking down looter parties for the guildmaster or trying catch up with a lord. 

And I don't see anything unrealistic about it.  It should be more up to my character's skill than mine to follow a group of tracks.

I thought these were good suggestions also but it seems they are just going to be swamped by inane threads with stupid suggestions, i.e. samurai. 

I agree completely.

Totally, my troops should wait for MY order to charge, not blindly run towards the fight.  Especially the archers as you pointed out.

It's such a simple change, but I think and important one.  I am still sort of slow with Warband's command interface, and I hate seeing my cavalry get slaughtered as they charge alone into the enemy because I couldn't issue the 'Hold' command in time.  I think it'd be good for new players who haven't learned the command menu as well.

Why should just daggers get some insanely powerful instant kill?  What's next, the swords have a special attack that can lop heads off with one attack?  And why do you think the dagger be a one use item?  I understand it's so that you can't spam backstab but it doesn't make any sense.  Therefore it shouldn't be implemented at all.

There is a reason why daggers aren't in multiplayer, because it's dumb to bring a knife to a sword fight.

HA a sword being too flexible to stab someone in the back is ridiculous.  I still fail to see a point to why a dagger is better suited to stab someone.  Consider the extra weight a sword has behind it.  Like what was said, daggers only have their deadly, sinister reputation as an assassination weapon because they can be concealed, which is completely useless on a battlefield.  I personally think only a fool would drop their sword to pull out a dagger.

Too gimmicky and gamey.

Just stab them in the back with a sword.  I think you'll get better results.

I agree that full faced helmets should have negative side effects.  But I think instead of actually seeing blackness, the helmets should just have negative modifiers in their stats.  Such as, I don't know, a penalty to all ranged accuracy or something to that effect.  That way it would work in both perspective modes and be easier to implement.