you shouldnt. most managers respond to that with the cyberpunk way: push developers even harder(include more features in the release coz we've promised etc) and the result is a nightmare for everyone. While it migth be helpful to create a shortlist of 5-10 most wanted features of the community /but that means conducting a poll that reaches most of the different communities) and such; you shouldnt put preassure on devs . it nevers results in anything good.
I only suggested a microscopic change, believing that it would be supported by most players (which is proved by the majority of votes) and that it would not be too difficult for developers to implement. Instead, you propose to make full-length checklist, ostensibly to make the whole task easier.
As a fan of the game since the time of single-player in 2008 and the first multiplayer servers in 2010, lack the old native siege and large-scale epic battles. At the moment, I don't see any reason to play here at all. I am not looking forward to any other features anytime soon, I just want to slightly improve what we have. I'm sure the developers have a huge stack of checklists in their desk that will have to work for many months.
PS: What you suggest can be done by the community by creating another topic. But I'm not sure that anyone would take it upon themselves to organize all this information for free. And in general, has anyone really done something like this before?
And we should not forget that the developers may have their own opinion about each change, because it is in their interest not to scare away old players and make the game enjoyable for newbies. Therefore, any shift towards hardcore can be either rejected or simply ignored.
PPS: I'm not sure how correctly the Google Translator worked, but I think that you can read and understand what I mean.