搜索结果: *

  1. The Midnight Watchmen [TMW] - UNDEFEATED IN OVER 5 YEARS

    ClockWise 说:
    That's pretty BOLD, Rurin.
  2. The Midnight Watchmen [TMW] - UNDEFEATED IN OVER 5 YEARS

    Kherven 说:
    haha welcome to the clan u are a great addition

    welkcome to the a team1!!!!111  :fruity: :fruity: :party:

    I'd like to lead a new Wailers of the Midday Tiktok pls
  3. [UNAC S6] Suggestions

    Roberta_Baratheon 说:
    As a member of the other team this happened to this week I know it sucks to have that happen. It's unfortunate it there is no way to wait it out without causing one team to lose their advantage. I think they should be able to pause it as much as others say otherwise. It's one thing if your winning you obviously don't want it paused, if you are losing and on the receiving end then you want a chance to have things on fair ground again. It can go either way, and in my opinion a pause should be allowed.

    If the admins want to implement a rule about this then whatever. The problem I have is this sort of thing being enforced while not being in the rules, and without notification to teams that if they can experience lag they can pause the game. In previous tournaments and matches, people often lag and even disconnect, but it's never been standard practice to stop another team from taking advantage. Warband just doesn't have the proper framework to allow for a pause without huge potential for abuse.

    You said that both teams only want it their way out of self-interest, but I don't think that's true. I'm perfectly happy with either situation as the RULES dictate. If there's no clear rules about it, then why should they be made up arbitrarily mid-match? If there's no rules you go by common practice, and that's not to pause unless both teams agree. (Long as it's not the start of the set where a Restart by a captain is available.)
  4. DOWN WITH LEGACY PLAINS!

    Balion Zero 说:
    the only reason maps like open plains was so liked back in the days was because it was all based on skill, not some retarded strategy and gimmick. It was purely who played better won, where today with MoTF the way it works and all these closed maps advertised as closed you can because more skilled team if you have a better strat and execution. However I am not for or against this map but curious to see how well it will go with the new motf ways.


    #ruinsforlife
    So strategy and coordination aren't skill? Should people win based solely off mechanics, which tend to be the MOST gimmicky (super feint spam, hilt slashin, etc).
  5. [UNAC S6] Suggestions

    Xenomorph4412 说:
    I didn't take any screenshots of the chat but correct me if I'm wrong, I think Can was the one that suggested a pause before we ever asked. I know that in TS we just kept playing and didn't think pausing was an option until Can asked.

    easy way to settle, check the server logs. And if the ref did, what justification would he even have? Even in the situation Can outlines, both teams agreed to pause. We clearly said no quickly after whoever called for a pause, after which Mad Dawg (I think) said it makes no sense for both teams to have to agree...

    BlackTide 说:
    Could I just pause you right there.

    Oh i see what you did there, good thing this is only a one-party consent state
  6. [UNAC S6] Week three results, discussions, and predictions!

    OurGloriousLeader 说:
    Referees should stick more closely to the rules
  7. [UNAC S6] Suggestions

    SUGGESTION

    I think that whats really missing from this tournament is a good old pause system. sometimes we experience lag and its really hard, like so bad that i get stuck and cant move. I propose that at anytime, if one team captain says pause (LITERALLY anytime, like mid round) then the ref should unilaterally stop combat. If the team loses that round, and the other team armors up because they slayed em, it should be discarded because thats unfair for one team to have more gold than another.

    Also, sometimes the servers we use to avoid bickering about servers are super ****, so we should mess around with using random ones without the maps installed on them, for approx half an hour or so? maybe more. That would greatly benefit the flow of a unac match.
  8. [WPL] Suggestions

    i agree that there should be a deadline somewhere for adding, and that it should also have some requirement that players on roster must have played in at least 1 set or w/e. I think even earlier into the tournament makes sense specifically because of the ladder style. Top teams are playing each other later in the tournament (generally) and so should have rosters fixed at approx that same time.
  9. [WPL] Suggestions

    Bubs 说:
    warpathz 说:
    John7 说:
    No additions once knockoutstage starts, unless in certain cases

    what certain cases?

    You could have a very small team, and one guy could tell the rest that he's too busy to be actively apart of a given team. So in that case, they would need a replacement IF let's say there were 8 guys and he was the 8th. Obviously, I don't think there's any teams with only 8 guys on their roster, so this scenario really doesn't apply, but I'm guessing this is what John was possibly attempting to get at.

    :][

    easily fixed by having more than the min required
  10. [WPL] Suggestions

    John7 说:
    No additions once knockoutstage starts, unless in certain cases

    what certain cases?
  11. [WPL] Suggestions

    To lagstro's concern - If I understand you correctly, the concern is that the new player (i.e. fletcher) did not earn there way onto an elimination/playoffs team and thus shouldnt be allowed to be played. We'd have to extend this logic and also remove any players from rosters who havent played any matches. They also didnt earn there way onto the team by your standards.

    But I think this is too intrusive and pointless. If the group that earned there way to a spot decides a player earned it why isnt that reasonable?

    I still think there should be a hard limit still where no roster changes are permitted
  12. Warbants

    Roberta_Baratheon 说:
    Very impressive match from Kelq, Warpath, Arni and Bendetto. Also Clockwise.

    started from not on the list an now we here, now we got the whole team here
  13. NA Player Rankings! (UPDATE: 10.15.15) (WPL1)

    I think the elite archer lists are all pretty respectable. Inf seems to have a few core and then it wanders, Cav seems to be a **** show for rankings imo
  14. [WPL] Suggestions

    MrNevino1 说:
    Oh, I'm sorry Cal, I'm sorry for assuming that a member of the admin team had some responsibility and knowledge that we as poor plebs didn't know about. How are we supposed to know you're only in charge of streaming? The tourney lists you as an admin so this you share blame with the rest of them for failure to do anything productive. At least that's my opinion, also I know you didn't creat rules. I just hoped that the admins could post something helpin is sort out this mess, yet all I see are Hani and Arys, with Hani doing more than good. So Cal I am so sorry that hurt your feelings, do you want me to grovel now? Say how wrong I was for assuming that you were apart of the admin team and had some decision making power?

    Cal pls

    nvino pls

    Thats not what he said at all. Cal simply said he was added less than a week ago so blaming all this **** about rules on him, which you did by naming him, is unfair, which it is. No need to get angry at admins that dont deserve it. You must be the mother, typical irrational posts and illogical thinking.
  15. [WPL] Suggestions

    Xenomorph4412 说:
    warpathz 说:
    Xenomorph4412 说:
    Hi, im warpath Xenomorph, im a sub decent inf, slightly mature and i like poking cav with my stick, hit me up if you wan some of dis".
    :fruity: :fruity:
    Warmorph?
    What have we done
    we have successfully hidden my original legitimate suggestion so that no admin will comment on it
  16. [WPL] Suggestions

    Xenomorph4412 说:
    Hi, im warpath Xenomorph, im a sub decent inf, slightly mature and i like poking cav with my stick, hit me up if you wan some of dis".
    :fruity: :fruity:
    Warmorph?
  17. [WPL] Suggestions

    WilySly 说:
    we just want to play with our buddies
    I just dont get why we have rules that are intended to stop this? Do any of the teams actually play in this tournament really care if TMW has a large roster? We're a big clan that plays other games too, and we want to be able to play the occasional match in WB with each other. Its not like we're compiling the best of the best from all the different clans to make one supergroup to win some ****ty prize pool.

    Also, who wants the draft other than hani? Why didnt we just make a thread "looking for team". Then people can post "Hi, im warpath, im a sub decent inf, slightly mature and i like poking cav with my stick, hit me up if you wan some of dis".
  18. Warbants

    Hani 说:
    Yes add or remove players through the FA and Draft system. As for the explicit, explicit, explicit rule. No, but it was thought by Arys that people would understand in the way it was termed. The answer is not to remove the rule warpath as you suggest, but rather to reword to the rules to more explicitly say it. If you want that can be done, I would be happy to oblige.
    I'm sorry, but i honestly don't know what you're talking about here. can you please re format and use quotes so i know what you're referring to?
    Also when did i suggest removing a rule?
  19. Warbants

    "Locking the thread because you cannot make changes to your roster until the Draft is over."
    "Teams can add or remove players up to and including the seventh week of the tournament"
    also this
后退
顶部 底部