搜索结果: *

Wow this actually looks great!
So many features all flowing together.
Good luck and I hope you finish soon

A concept for a mod that I had was a mod similar to Full Invasion.

-The idea is that it is a cooperative game where players fight off waves of bots. (Sounds identical right?)
-The unique thing is that there will be time between waves to go out into the map away from your defended position and collect resources in a similar style to that in Persistent World or similar mods.
-At certain intervals an NPC caravan would arrive. This is where you sell your resources and buy equipment.

The setting I was considering for this was Wild West, however it could be almost anything.
So if anyone had any thoughts or comments on it then I would greatly appreciate them.
Thank you

I wish you lots of luck and of course as always, love.
Love you!

Goooood fun. Can't wait for the full version to be released.
Venice is a fantastic change of pace and very intense but more custom maps are eagerly awaited.
I am up for the next session.

Signed,
Corporal Greentiny of the 1st Zombie Brigade

I LOVE YOU KAREL!
If you have a spare pony for me to ride... I mean if you are short of someone to help you ride.. I mean I can ride if you want me to... I mean I want to suck your willy Karel!

I am starting to get quite offended by your attitude due to the fact you have been insulting me personally throughout your posts in this thread aswell as when you were in the server attempting to obtain my help.

I am not quite sure why you are attacking me personally and why you won't stop due to the fact that all I have done is apologise and tried to give reasons for why I failed you. However apparently according to the logs and a more mature admin you are in the wrong and I am in the right. However, regardless to this you continue to insult me eventhough a verdict of your guilt has been delivered by a head admin.

I am not sure what you hope to gain by repeating your original points and insulting me but I just want to say I have been nothing but courteous and you have been nothing but rude, ignorant and arrogant and I think that for the best this thread should be locked.

I wasn't "purposely being a douche bag" but I understand why you are angry about it.

I did not ignore you once, I simply did not see the chat as there were a lot of kills happening and chat aswell. Similarly I did not see those guys mocking you in chat for what I can only presume are similar reasons. Also I did not once tell you to "shut up".

And I am sorry about the first two being made by the same guy because I was not aware of the first one as it is generally assumed to be accidental and I was unaware it was the same guy.

However I did not pursue this after you left the server because these players involved stopped TKing aswell as the fact you went out on a negative.

Also the fact that you are insulting me when I am trying to be helpful and considerate is not doing you any favours.

I don't know why you are being so aggressive. I apologised and gave my reasons for why I was not delivering admin perfection.

You have offended me in no way whatsoever.

And for future reference, say your full complaint as opposed to saying admin because it generally saves time for all involved.

Okay I can see why you are upset but the way you dealt with it as you have admitted was wrong.
I will apologise for not being as attentive to your situation as I should have been, however there were a lot of people on the server therefore it was hard for me to see who was TKing you everytime.

However, TKing me was 100% the wrong action to take.

Regarding the incident with people on the roof, I did not instantly slay them. I asked for the player to get off the roof and he refused in chat claiming that it was okay. Due to him refusing to get down I slayed him as it was clear he was not going to listen to me.

Also it may seem like I was enforcing the rules that I wanted to, however I was enforcing rules when and if I was able to, which is a big difference to what you claim.

Again I will apologise for not being attentive enough to your situation.

I will now let a head admin decide how to deal with this.

Sorry if I failed to be 100% helpful. There were a lot of players online and it isn't the best system to admin with, especially with that many people. I know I missed a lot of TKs but I can't just slay everyone for one TK. I have to have seen it which as I just said is very difficult with so many players. Otherwise the accidental TKs would be slayed.
Also I don't know if you misread it or I mistyped it but what I was trying to say was "Do not TK for ANY reason."

Another reason why it took so long to get around to replying to you was that there were a couple of issues going on at the time that I was trying to deal with and focusing on. So I apologise again for not being able to do enough for you.

Gawd Jasper, don't even know what a boop is...

I have a suggestion for everyone that whole heartedly disagrees with this thread.

Go and play cavalry for the next 7 days on NW without playing infantry. This includes linebattles and public play. Also feel free to play cavalry on other mods or just native and get a comparison of the difficulty. After doing that for 7 days you will experience what we do and at least have some kind of empathy with cavalry players.

All I ask is that you give cavalry a PROPER play through for a few days without playing infantry.

I agree with those things, but maybe the bayonet needs a reduction in speed rather than damage, therefore bayonet vs bayonet fights wouldn't be so... strange.

I am not sure how you would go about doing this but a suggestion for changes would be making Hussars, Cuirassiers effective at swinging on horseback but not so effective on foot in melee. However making Dragoons better on foot and weaker on horseback, so the reverse. I imagine a way to do this is reduced dragoon riding skill, but an increase in dragoon accuracy with guns (firearm skill) would be good.
This is just my opinion, dictated by my experience.


Oh and another point, it would be great if people can just post their suggestions for changes and for this 'discussion' to finally end as all the attacks on other people's opinions and suggestions is becoming boring, repetitive and spammy.

The Austrian Cavalry regiment Chevauleger Regiment Furst von Hohenzollern Nr.2 has been disbanded.
Thank you.

avion365 说:

You know by this period in time dragoons where not Mounted Infantry,  the only reason a lot of them where given that name was so they could pay them less, and the fact that almost 3/4 of the cavalry had carbines plus bayonets.

点击展开...

This is a game and without using the unique aspect of dragoons they become regular cavalry and there is no point in having them in the game. Also people have been saying this a lot that the majority of dragoons were not mounted infantry however some still were so... your point?

Dragoons do not have time to form up, shoot AND escape before the enemy turns and volleys with generally more shots and greater accuracy on larger targets (horses) therefore meaning that the dragoons come off worse for initiating. This is due to as I said earlier, the lower accuracy of the dragoons and perhaps the rules which could be at fault.

My point is, dragoons are meant to be mounted infantry, NOT a jack of all trades as they seem to attempt to be in this game. Therefore the key difference here is that they should be superior infantry to line infantry and skirmishers which is currently not the case.

Now, the problem could be that because the coding works with the base stats and points in weapon skills, it means that you cannot really make cavalry good on horse and worse on foot which should be the reality. This is why there is the current fact that most cavalry is better on foot than dragoons because dragoons have inferior sword skill or something to that effect.

Basically to sum up this... thing... dragoons should be one of the best units on foot but they are currently worst at everything.

I will add my piece about dragoons because there is very little coverage at the moment.

As the leader of a dragoon regiment and therefore being compelled to play dragoons in linebattles I have found that they are absolutely appalling and I am pretty sure they are the worst class. It is difficult to actually say this 100% because every nation has varying gear for their dragoons. However, generally speaking dragoons are inferior to all other classes in every way.

-They have lower riding skill resulting in being slower and less maneuverable.
-They have appalling accuracy with their guns which essentially makes them fairly worthless.
-Dragoon swords are shorter than heavy and weaker and I assume slower than light.

So at the end of the day a dragoon gets beaten by everything when fighting on horseback and also when dismounted. This begs the question apart from driveby shooting in public, where is the place for dragoons in NW? The answer is, right now, there isn't.

Napoleonic Wars' main feature is the linebattle events so therefore I would assume that every class in the game should have some kind of purpose in linebattles. As I said before, dragoons have no place. However moving onto a more general and probably bigger issue, lines are completely OP in linebattles and there is no reason to have any other unit. This may be down to the rules that are being used by the event organisers, however it doesn't change the fact that when shooting at a group of enemies, the difference in accuracy between rifles and muskets is negligable. Also cavalry cannot engage lines without getting shot, spammed and spun.

To finish this all off, my main question is, why is the only class that is unlimited the most powerful by far?
Surely it makes no sense for cavalry to be inferior AND limited.

Feel free to help yourself to an Austrian cookie, from Austria.