搜索结果: *

Xardob 说:

Hate to say it, but I don't think we actually have a community anymore. 

点击展开...

Ugh. That's a real shame. I miss the game and the people.


~Twinkle, nostalgically recalling the past

MaHuD 说:

I don't think there is a current (active) game

点击展开...

Ah. for some reason I thought Llandy's game was still in progress.

~Twinkle, sooooo new game?

Bipoty-bop.

Oh boy! Werewolf. does anyone have an idea of when the current game will wrap-up?

~Twinkle, who hasn't played in so long but wants to get reengaged with the lovely communtiy

Pharaoh X Llandy 说:

I think too many "seasoned" players have moved on, and not enough new players are interested. I did get some newbies for my Werewolf-like (it's like Rogue-like) Most Dangerous Game but it turns out education is more important or something. 

点击展开...

Edukaton? The *** iz that.

For Christmas break I would be willing to join a game. Preferably tag-team.

~Twinkle, glad to hear *something* is going on

Huh. Thought I would come back to find a thriving, completely rekindled werewolf community. 

~Twinkle, twinkle, little star

Would you look at that, I have successfullycleared my sig to someone.  Well glad to have the clearance, good sir.

The right of which you choose to reserve has been duly noted. 

~Twinkle, who humbly stands corrected on whether or not Lumos would read his signature

Cpt. Nemo 说:

Wow Twonkie, you really weren't kidding when you said jalf the population hates it.

点击展开...

....I'm impressed by just how much you managed to botch up my username.... well done. On purpose I presume.

It is noteworthy to mention that the j and the h happen to be located somewhat close together on the keyboard, in my defense.  Although I am sure both jalf and half the population hate the sig. 

Epicrules 说:

Lumos isn't exactly a bastion of friendliness, don't take what he says too harshly.

点击展开...

Well I'll be go to hell -- had him pegged as a type B personality the whole time. 

In all seriousness though I appreciate that; just had him pegged as very antisignature.

~Twinkle, who doesn't think Lumos will read this sig

All insults aside, and doing myself the favor of assuming your post was well intended, Lumos, I will elaborate my intentions of such a signature.

Before I begin, I would like to express my deepest sympathies for your apparent and utter hatred for my signature. I can see it has upset you quite sufficiently and caused you much grief, so rest assured your pain has been noted and directed to my public relations staff and shall be processed in due time.

First, the numerous times my name has been misspelled, particularly in the werewolf community, is beyond count, and the variations are quite interesting. Anything from Twinkie to Winkle, and as far as I could tell quite by accident. So across the many boards I have joined, I have found it useful to clarify one's user name, and this serves as a gentle and constant reminder. Find it egotistical? Meh. Guilty as charged.

Secondly, the signature allows me to leave a fleeting comment or put emphasis on a specific issue, which I also find rather useful in Werewolf, not to mention it also allows me to possibly leave something witty if I so chose.

Third of all, throw around all the condescending terms you would like, it gives me a little extra character to add to my posts, and I thoroughly enjoy it.

So I hope you'll take this opportunity to realize that it's a style I enjoy, it allows for certain uses and is not limited to the Tale World's board. Anyway, apparently my public relations team got back to me and decided the various complaints are unwarranted; if you would like to read the sig block you may, if not then don't bother, I won't lose any sleep over it.

~Twinkle, who notes that he may be twat, but happily so

Wellenbrecher 说:

Jokes on him, I doubt anyone actually reads that bit.
It's like advert sidebars or banners at the top and bottom, utterly useless by now, people just learned to ignore them over the years.

点击展开...

I post merely so that future generations can be privileged by my works of literature. Feel free to read or not. 

On another subject -- Hi Vieira!!

~Twinkle, who notes Epicrules seems to be implying that he reads the sig blocks

Hey all,

Reintroducing myself. My name is Twinkle, and I'm six months clean 

Seriously though, good to be back... it's me... with the signature that about jalf the population hates.

~Twinkle, who really wishes he hadn't taken such a long absence

Pop my head in to see how ya'll are doing and I see there hasn't been a game run here in a while.

~Twinkle, just a quick "hello" to you all

Hey,  I hate the fact that I had to leave you all hanging over the past few days. The sad truth is that I just don't have the time to continue. My apologies to the host and players. I hope you all have a grand old time.

~Twinkle, peace out

Lord Brutus 说:

@Twinkle  As you well know, proof is hard to come by in any stage of this game.  But common sense reasoning is not.  Your reasoning I would refer to as "uncommon" sense.  But carry on just as if you believe it.  It don't make me no never mind.  Xardob hasn't impressed me yet with his legendary wolf hunting.  Perhaps there is an obvious reason for this?

点击展开...

I want proof that you aren't a blatant liar. You said you posted reasons for why you voted for Untitled besides for just blaming it on his meme, and i asked for you to direct me to them which you have yet to do. Proof that you aren't a liar shouldn't be hard to come by at all.

Moose, calm your titties. It's hard to quote each part of your post separately on a mobile device.

~Twinkle, patience, grasshopper

Okay, so sorta just skimmed everything because I am busy, but I notice Brutus failed to supply the proof I asked for, and as such I can only assume he doesn't have the proof requested. Although I haven't read it yet, I am much more happy with the depth (purely from skimming) of Moose's posts and thus feel comfortable changing my vote. Unvote: Moose! Vote: Brutus

One thing I would like to hear from Xardob -- why are you sold on Moose's innocence and Vieira's guilt?

Moose, to engage in the long response I need to give to you requires a computer; expect a reply from me tonight (9:00 pm eastern-ish)

~Twinkle, with the need for more wifi and a computer

Lord Brutus 说:

So, why no vote for Untitled, then.  That would be really friendly.  Or make me believe your choice is the correct one.  That would be super friendly.  I just saying he's not really experienced and his wolfy self jumped to a vote on someone he knows is innocent.

点击展开...

is this what you mean? If so that's hardly an explanation or compilation of facts.

~Twinkle, if there is another post them show him

Lord Brutus 说:

I already explained my vote on Untitled but your  WoT probably obscured it.  It amazes me how many times someone votes for me with no conceivable reason, yet I'm the one who is suspicious?  Yes, you are correct, I switched off of you when someone else became more wolflike.  Don't take it as a compliment though; you still may turn up red.

Brutus~who hates absent-minded posting.

点击展开...

Okay point me to the post, if you so happened to explain it. Because the original post (which I provided a quote for) only seems to be based on the meme posted by Untitled. Quote for me where you make the elaboration.

Will reply to Moose! Tomorrow.

~Twinkle, who hates posts that can't provide the proof to back up their claim

@Brutus

Lord Brutus 说:

MaHuD 说:

Brutus, what is your plan?

点击展开...

Plan?  Finish washing the lunch dishes, have a major pot roast cooking for supper and also have a game of Bandit Kings of Ancient China going.  I'm planning on conquering two prefectures before the end of the day.

Oh, also, I'd like to find and lynch a wolf, preferably one named Twinkle.

点击展开...

Wants to vote Twinkle, wonderful. No argument made though, not so wonderful.

Lord Brutus 说:

The majority has spoken, no more memes.  Unvote.  Vote: Untitled.  Thanks for IDing yourself as a wolf. I like that.  It immediately gets my interest when I'm blue and some Homo Erectus votes for me.

点击展开...

Okay so I need some clarity, bro. I do understand very much that Untitiled's vote seems unwarranted since he fails to adequately explain why he is doing so, but your vote seems pure madness to me. If I am the one you want lynched, why jump boats as soon as a vote is thrown your way? To me, and from your post, it sounds like the memes are the reason you are voting for him, but aren't others far more guilty of the meme crime? Your vote seems illogical to me, I need you to expound upon it. With this logic of voting due to the memes, Untitled should hardly be the one to pick for the vote; it seems like you just wanted to nail a more vulnerable innocent IMO.

Lord Brutus 说:

I am suspect because a wolfy Untitled has voted for me?  Interdasting.  That makes you suspect No. 2.  It never ceases to amaze me how people voting for me when I'm blue makes me a suspect!  You guys need to get your game on. 

点击展开...

The problem is, Brutus, that to my knowledge you have been unable to give a reasonable argument for the lynching of untitled (and correct me if I am wrong, but I saw none). Actually, I am forced to agree with MaxiHand that you are the suspiscous one here, and owe some explaining for your OMGUS vote and immediate departure from the lynch Twinkle wagon.

@Moose

Moose! 说:

I feel like that's what I do as a wolf. I probably do it as an innocent too, but I definitely do it when I'm playing as a wolf.

点击展开...

This seems like an odd comment. If you would potentially do it as an innocent, even if you would definitely do it as a wolf, it makes no sense to vote for Delta K. You need more substance than, "Oh, *I* might do this as an innocent, but *I* would definitely do it as a wolf." Although you have changed your vote, I still think that such a comment needs more explaining as to why all of the sudden you feel that that one comment, which could have been either wolfy or innocent from your own understanding, was enough to make you want to lynch him.

Moose! 说:

Delta[K] 说:

It seems to me he is travelling wherever the wind blows

点击展开...

隐藏

Delta[K] 说:

and his votes are put in place to try to gather a following.

点击展开...

I'd love to gather a following. Climb aboard the Untitled Train people, choo choo!

点击展开...

Eventually you change your vote, seemingly on whim, to Untitled. Them Delta K challenges your leaf like behavior, and you laugh it off. Don't you think your change of vote deserves to be explained? Why is this an acceptable reason to lynch someone:

Moose! 说:

k

Unvote

Vote Untitled

点击展开...

Moose! 说:

Untitled. 说:

if

点击展开...

点击展开...

I fail to see this as even an argument... Explain! Elaborate!

Moose! 说:

Next stop, lynching a scum.

点击展开...

Wonderful news, Moose!... Except you haven't given us any reasoning to do so! I know you're proud of the one time you managed to pull off a wolf lynch on day one but that has no grounds here, and you haven;t given us any info to convince us you're right.

Moose! 说:

Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. 说:

Vote: Vieira

点击展开...

Why?

点击展开...

Speaking of not providing any info... why are you curios as to why Maxihand isn't providing info, but yet you do it so much worse than he did. That's not adding up.

Moose! 说:

Big McLarge-Huge 说:

Might should? 

点击展开...

Might should.

Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. 说:

Why the assertion of innocence following what seems nothing more than a meme-based joke vote from Untitled? Why the certainty of wolfishness of Untitled?

点击展开...

Brutus' post isn't convincing to me. Untitled response is what piqued my interest, and I think MaHuD hit the nail on the head.

Untitled. 说:

Sides, how is acting against the majority a wolfy thing to do? Ideally, a wolf would just want to cruise by without stirring the hornet's nest too much. I don't follow your logic.

点击展开...

This suggests to me that he is thinking about ways to avoid appearing guilty.

And, his response to my vote is similarly concerning to me, what with the "if" I turn innocent.

Untitled. 说:

I'm getting the feeling you don't appreciate me very much. We'll all have a good laugh about this later, mmkay? Beers on you though, if I turn out to be as innocent as the priest's daughter.

点击展开...

点击展开...

At this post we finally see some meat. Yay!

Point #1) Can you show me where MAHuD "hit the nail on the head please". And you say Untitled "piqued your interest," but quite frankly it seems like you're intentionally using weak terms. You have voted for Untitled, and since it was good enough to leave behind your vote on Delta K then it must have some more merit than simply the hunch you had for Delta K.

Point #2) Pointing out why you are less wofly is not the same as being a wolf. It shouldn't come as much of a surprise, but if all the innocents play their cards right, they should all appear to be innocent, and him pointing out why he is innocent is hardly reason to vote him. I am utterly shocked the "if" comment bothers you.... no wolf is going to give away himself with one word like you are suggesting.

Anyway, your lack of explanation for the majority of the game, your use of week language to make your vote seem less than it is, the fact that I hardly see ground for a lynch on Untitled, and the fact that you blow from person to person with your votes is what warrants you my vote.
Unvote: Vieira 
Vote: Moose!

~Twinkle, with the tough questions

To be fair to Vieira, I just went and looked at a tag-team game I played with him, and his play does line up for when he was innocent in this "neutral" sort of play. And while I am not a fan of it, it does appear to be his norm. I'Llandy comment more when I have time.

~Twinkle, confirming the info Vieira presented

I actually just realized that I have nothing in McHuge's post to reply to, because aside from correcting my ass-like behavior there was nothing to argue.

@Vieira
Your very recent comments on me are more or less what I personally would consider to be "fence sitting." For the most part you present a point, and then a counter point, keeping you overall at an indifferent stand point, allowing you to easily throw your vote in either direction later on when you see which way the votes begin to swing.

You pretty much reiterate what people consider to be my errors, and then reiterate the defenses presented for me. What you're doing has been used in the past many times as a classic wolf coverage; you appear to be contributing but rather you are simply repeating old information, appearing to be neutral, and then when the chips are down you throw your vote easily to either side without taking any flack.

I'd like to hear your official stance on the issue at hand, which way you lean and why. Also, do you have any other suspects? Would you like to throw poo on any other walls to see if it sticks?

For now, since Vieira seems most wolfy to me Vote: Viera

Also, just to adress the issue of me "not placing a vote to apply pressure" -- who would you have had me apply pressure to? While McHuge was evidentlying the ringleader of the meme scandal, others contributed as well. Voting for one person on the grounds that they were meming would have been baseless seeing as basically everyone was doing so.

~Twinkle, who feels "applying pressure with a vote" would have been useless seeing how many people were using memes

Nah it was during the game he hosted. Locke maybe??

~Twinkle, who notes all sorts of vile insults were exchanged, "your argument is ****" and such