搜索结果: *

Bloody Bill 说:

Simple solution to that is to not die...or do stupid crap that will kill you at least.

点击展开...

who knew the solution to dying was so simple

what if my life gets released early, ill never know if TW can live up to the hype or not

FBohler 说:

Problem is I'm not going to rely on others' opinions, I would rather lose 50 bucks to find out it's a horrible game by myself (and maybe try to help it by giving feedback), than wait the reviews to get better like some sort of medieval No Man's Sky.

点击展开...

I would tend to agree with you in relying on other's opinions, but the track record for these things is just too hard for myself to ignore, with things like steam reviews and the few curators I trust for accurate reviews, being that they are so consistently accurate... plus I can always judge whether I will like a game or not by watching gameplay footage or streaming content.

FBohler 说:

My thoughts as well.

Waiting too much and watching too much content before buying may kill my hype.
Imagine waiting for 8 years just to give up from buying the game when it finally comes out.

点击展开...

I don't really understand this mentality. no game out there is exceptional enough to ignore feedback. TW only gave us multiplayer during beta so that's why it seems that people are only concerned with it. the performance of one part of the game should reflect the other... so to me what it sounds like is a bunch of people trying to rationalize their doubts of a poor beta experience and lean heavily into singleplayer making up for it.

Shouldn't it be that you waited 8 years and therefore you can wait a couple more months for the reviews to come out- no problem? No funny business, just waiting for a consensus on a physical product and being unimpressed by the loads of speculation being offered currently

at first was hype, then played the beta. got less hyped.

am thinking if they manage to score an "overwhelmingly positive" rating on steam, I'll think about it. but based on what I've seen, I think I'd rather wait until I hear when the final product is planned for launch and keep an eye on the reviews. especially the single player reviews. there's going to be a **** storm of youtubers and twitch people playing and reviewing the game... it'll be pretty obvious if it's worth buying or not

Revverie 说:

Is it that this guy is being delirious, or trying to be ironic and failling completely

点击展开...

don't call me delirious and talk about me like im not here just because you can't operate on more than 1 layer of irony

Androme1 说:

They'll likely allow free weekends once in a while through Steam like most multiplayer games does.

点击展开...

can't say I blame them, can you imagine if steam had free pony ride weekends?

Crotiz 说:

Well!... Ok I got nothing.

点击展开...

yes because you realized those girls grew up to buy a full horse, and they never would have done that unless they got a free pony first

Crotiz 说:

Pay for it like the rest of us.

点击展开...

You telling me you think a single one of these kids actually paid for their ponies out of pocket?
Nope, doubt it, and look they are all happy...not a single hacker either

Revverie 说:

I dont understand, do you want it or not?

点击展开...

I want pony to be free

Revverie 说:

It always was general bull****ery, this idea is one of the most deranged suggestion I've ever seen in my life

点击展开...

You think it sounds like bull****, or it's impossible... until it happens to you and your favorite game!! RIP EVE online 2006-2018

and just like that we are downgraded from a suggestion to general bull****tery!

danEN 说:

Ok I get you now, yep terrible ****ing idea.

Have you even taken into consideration the people who will only buy the game for multiplayer? How much money they will lose from that will probably match or outweigh anyone who decides to buy SP after playing this free MP. So straight away pointless, so then they're forced to turn the MP into one of these cretinous games that's filled with mictrotransactions, MTX and lootboxes just to try and actually generate some money from it.

点击展开...

Yes! I have considered it, and I doubt it very much, to be honest. I am the pragmatist, I do not like it but I refuse to look away. The trend seems to be everyone agrees SP is great and only some people believe MP is great. I am one of those that thinks they are both great. I sincerely have yet to see a single person who doesnt want to play SP and only wants MP

So they likely arent going to lose any money at all, from the people who already plan to buy the game. I would say its almost certain.But yes! now you are getting it. All the dirty tactics to expose an anticipated title to as many sales as possible all rolled into one, completely "free" client. it's evil yes, but would it work? probably, I dont think so many AAA developers would be doing if it didnt work. The fans all hate it though, which is proved here in this thread, hopefully. So now if TW was thinking about doing it maybe they will reconsider

danEN 说:

I don't understand your whole multiplayer only thing, you get that early access will come with singleplayer and multiplayer right? It's not like the beta.

Or are you somehow suggesting that people will be pissed off that they have to choose SP or MP through the launcher, but surely that's not what you're banging on about.

点击展开...

smh how are you confused about this? TW has the option to make TWO clients, one free and can only access multiplayer/limited customization and the other cost $50 which includes multuplayer , full customization and singleplayer. Why would that work? Because people who are already going to buy the game, will not suffer having a limited free client and will shell out the $50 irregardless. Other people though, who just arent going to buy this game one way or another, might be enticed to downloading a free client, which could eventually result in the sale of a full client somewhere down the line. Just like the argument for cross platform, which seems is a foregone conclusion for Bannerlord, the argument for a free limited client seems to be too tempting for many developers to pass up. Me though? If you are going to try and extract anything out of the devs, might as well go with the free pony.

Lord Brutus 说:

Cost of food and upkeep means the pony ain't free. Also, I see 62 "No" votes and only 6 "yes", yet only one person talking about free MP which clearly means you voted 6 times. Admit it.

点击展开...

You arent thinking of the big picture. If everyone gets a free pony over night, the demand of services will also sky rocket overnight. with denser service areas to work with, the inevitable saturation of services that would result in the market, a highly competitive end user market would emerge, so we all get the benefit of a free pony, and a more fair and rejuvenated pony services economy

Lord Brutus 说:

Cost of food and upkeep means the pony ain't free. Also, I see 62 "No" votes and only 6 "yes", yet only one person talking about free MP which clearly means you voted 6 times. Admit it.

点击展开...

By that logic there would be 62 people talking about how they dont want it, so no, it does not logically follow. I didnt even vote for free MP once, sorry this conspiracy is busted like your sense of humor

Lord Brutus 说:

Why, it's obvious you voted 6 times.

点击展开...

anyone can clearly see that isn't true. I voted only once for the clear and true best option. Frankly I am shocked only 12 people arent stupid enough to pass up a chance for a free pony

Lord Brutus 说:

You're a real pro at tips. Here's one: Don't make multiplayer free, Dumbo.

点击展开...

Sorry chap you only get to vote once

Lord Brutus 说:

dumbo things for dumbos

点击展开...

hey here's a thought.... don't give attention to people who are clearly banned and do not deserve it, just let the momentum of time put distance between anything they've done and anyone who would remember... protip my friend!

Divina Commedia 说:

The eager wait for early access is clearly driving certain people insane.

点击展开...

People often call you insane until they have their moment of clarity... then you're a genius!

_Osiris_ 说:

" The benefits of more players and ability to share the experience with your friends as you say, far outweighs the potential consequences of having to deal with more cheaters, by a long shot. "

what benefits? how does talewords benefit by you and your mates playing for free? afaik they dont have a bustling cosmetics market to make up for lost revenue

点击展开...

literally read the first OP of this thread... smh

flavberg 说:

my face is like a huge question mark

点击展开...

you should start a career in questionable modeling

danEN 说:

This thread doesn't make any sense. I don't know what "clear" argument you've seen but I'm not seeing **** here.

点击展开...

Clearly you don't see clearly.The argument is clear: a multiplayer only client will just piss most people off in the long run. Anyone who has to suffer such a fate, such as everyone in this beta, will be left aggravated and begging for more... but that more is hiding behind a $50 paywall, which they will gladly pay as ransom for their sanity after enduring such torment

LeChat 说:

I hope you understood it was a joke.

点击展开...

Oh no...too late! I've already headed your suggestion and taken action to satisfy the outcome, all is lost