搜索结果: *

same here, first i thought my mods are casuing this. but then i read more ppl are having this issue

2022-06-22_01.19.11_ac2890457bd6196a66fef721946b0a50

ctd even when i remove mods

same here, deleted all mods, validated game, still nothing


Try to load dll TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Steam.dll

Resolving: TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.XmlSerializers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null
Try to load dll TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.XmlSerializers.dll

Resolving: TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.XmlSerializers
Try to load dll TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.XmlSerializers.dll

Can't reset context
Loading FiraSansExtraCondensed-Regular font, at: D:\Steam\steamapps\common\Mount & Blade II Bannerlord\Modules\Native\LauncherGUI\Fonts\FiraSansExtraCondensed-Regular/FiraSansExtraCondensed-Regular.fnt
The type initializer for 'TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.WidgetInfo' threw an exception.
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.WidgetInfo.GetWidgetInfo(Type type)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.Widget..ctor(UIContext context)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.EventManager..ctor(UIContext context)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.UIContext.Initialize()
at TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.StandaloneUIDomain.Update()
at TaleWorlds.TwoDimension.Standalone.WindowsFramework.MessageLoop()
The type initializer for 'TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.WidgetInfo' threw an exception.
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.WidgetInfo.GetWidgetInfo(Type type)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.Widget..ctor(UIContext context)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.EventManager..ctor(UIContext context)
at TaleWorlds.GauntletUI.UIContext.Initialize()
at TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.StandaloneUIDomain.Update()
at TaleWorlds.TwoDimension.Standalone.WindowsFramework.MessageLoop()
at TaleWorlds.TwoDimension.Standalone.WindowsFramework.Start()
at TaleWorlds.MountAndBlade.Launcher.Library.Program.Main(String[] args)

Death2Tyrants 说:

Orchards need to produce food at dynamic rate instead of static. You can't have a negative modifier like Prosperity that keeps going up while the primary positive contributor is static.

And granaries are also static so at higher prosperity, it runs out of food faster.

点击展开...

agreed.

starvation is annoying af because there is literally nothing you can do about it.

players should have the option to counter this negative modifier. could be a mission? or send out a trade cargo to do this job?

you dont. its a way to balance out your effort, or in other cases to help build up loyalty and security when you first capture the town. when your settle has high loyalty and security, it "drifts" towards the negative end, when you have low loyalty and security, it drifts towards the positive end.

one more thing to add to the list

please change the loot system. its a huge pain to sell loots after battle. and whats the point of selling dead man's cloth. cant you just present my loot in terms of gold and a very few decent items that players might actually keep? Besides, the loot from battle is imbalance, you easily make milions, whats the point of me trading across the map for some change money.

there is a new one that does the job.

Adryl 说:

Or bugs can look like duplicates but in fact are caused by different issues in the code. How common are these recurring bugs anyway? I been playing since e1.5.1, I have 200 hours in and have not seen anything fixed come "un-fixed" after an update.

点击展开...

Actually i can think of one, not exactly game breaking bug but they fixed it before but its in 1.54 again.
A few patches back, they fixed the art work of troops for being too fat and old. Now in 1.54 new recuits look older than my grandpa, and too fat as well.

Itisausername 说:

When an issue cannot be reproduced what do you want them to do keep trying until they cant or get a save file

点击展开...

I'm talking about the ones that are present in every game. Like this lock item thing, and that sally out when defending bug a few patches ago, the bandit lair crash bug.
look, im just saying, If the dev could spend a tiny amount of time testing before going live, it would probably encourge more ppl to play beta branch.

Itisausername 说:

Thats why the QA team exists and no most of these things are different for most people which is why they sometimes require save games if an issue cannot be reproduced so to answer you yes they do

点击展开...

say

• Fixed the issue where locking items in the trade screen prevented the "Take All/Buy All" feature from working as intended.

do you think bugs like this require thorough investigation or game save?
I've been playing beta branch begining. I'd say half of the beta releases have some bug trivial as this one.

Adryl 说:

I'd rather have them spend that time to fix two additional bugs than to thoroughly test what they did so far. It's a beta branch. There's gonna be bugs. They do hotfixes for the main ones anyway. There's no problem with this process, it is very standard in software development.

点击展开...

Yes, I understand and I can play this beta branch game with all those bugs. I'm just complaining about those extremely obvious ones. I wish they could just do a quick check, like 1 hour game play, if they dont find anything wrong in that on hour. then its good to go for release.

e

hamletsdead 说:

How on earth can the devs introduce new bugs and break things that are already fixed in the stable build? The beta should be for new sh*t and improvements, not the disaster it looks like. I know we're all on lockdown and cannabis is cheap, but how can they not send their work out for a check to the guys they work with, which is standard practice everywhere? (Dev 1 to Dev 2: "Hey, I did some improvements on notable powers, can you check if it runs alright before we release this?" Response: "Sure, no problem. Just let me finish watching the last episode of VEEP and I'll jump on it."). Instead it's like they're releasing first drafts of everything which need substantial work to run properly. I agree they fixed some of the major bugs almost immediately (e.g., the siege bug) but those bugs should never have been introduced in the beta ever.

点击展开...

exactly, most of the new bugs they introduced with new patches could be easily spotted by actually having someone to PLAY THE GAME for an hour or two.

froggyluv 说:

Note to non-chinese readers -
Mandarin: shinShunShin shinshuSun
Cantonese: BAWKCHOOOW!!

点击展开...

Note to NOT-SO-SMART readers
It's korean in the title

VBMeireles 说:

I noticed that too and have no idea why.

点击展开...

i tried to remove this idle perk point using export/import mod. interestingly, it wont do, and u cant even edit ur smithing skill lvl, i tried to edit it to 270ish, but once back in game, its restored to 301 lvl. yet any other changes i made are perfectly fine.

its even more so in 1.3 patch. AI seems to have the tendency to declare war on factions that are already fighting on multiple fronts. In my recent save, west empire declared war on battania and valandian, then aseri and stugian joined.

Also, picking enemy seems to be broken too. AI lords sometimes declare war on faction soooo far from their heartland. What you'd expect is that, they gather an army, took a exclave settlement far from their base, that settlement gets attacked later, gather another army travle across the world to defend, in the process an neighboring faction declare war on them, and took settlements easily when no one is there to defend.