搜索结果: *

Captain Kris 说:

Kobrag 说:

I wish that every worthwhile member (and me) on taleworlds meets up and has an orgy

点击展开...

Screw this game, where do you want to meet ;D

点击展开...

You meet up with Kobrag...and he yiffs you in a barn...that burns down before you finish.

I wish for omniscience.

D'Sparil 说:

Hack McSlash 说:

Girls (real girls),too. 

点击展开...

Yeah, but they suck, except for Pharaoh Llandy, whos pretty cool.

点击展开...

Always preferred girls who suck, myself. 

Death is an inevitable, unknowable, and permanent change. Same things goes with waking up in the morning, more or less.

Things happen. Don't force, fight, or flee the natural flow of things. It'll happen when it happens, and I'll get to find out if there is anything "after this life". Of course, I'll miss those I care about and the interactions with them...but meh, everything ends.

Gculk 说:

Get over 9000 bookmarks, then it won't be powerful enough to stop it.

Alternatively, save your bookmarks in a text file.

点击展开...

Actually, I'd do this is you actually use that many bookmarks. A text file is easily moved, easily displayed, and doesn't require a program not already installed in most every computer.

If I could find a girl who is A. Cute (not hot, not gorgeous, just cute), B. Rational, and C. Has played Planescape: Torment as many times as I have, then I will club her and bring her to my cave.

Or ask her out to dinner without a moments hesitation. If she accepted old-school courtship over me buying her dinner, then all the better.

Hmmm, haven't been on in quite some time. I doubt anyone remembers me, but I remember some pretty good times (lurked during the Pavlov times, fooled in the April Fool's Moderator Shenanigans, and saw the emergence of Kobrag), things looked pretty much like they do now (new people, which is good to see). This place has kept is flavor.

Girls (real girls),too. 

Science is basically, by definition, experimenting with stuff people don't fully understand. This is the best way to learn about something, so in the name of progress and knowledge....my opinion is make a doomsday machine and press the on button to find out what happens. 

Hmmm...Dave?

Kissaki 说:

Actually, since science deals with evidence, it is by definition atheist. It does not claim that there is no god (same as science has never claimed there is no Santa Claus); it merely contents itself in not including the idea of gods until there is a reason to. Science, then, is not atheistic in the sense of "there is no god", but rather it is atheistic in the sense that it does not include gods. And that's the way most atheists think, too. Very few would say "there is no god", unless they've been disillusioned in a former faith. The atheist (modern or otherwise) thinks, "I don't believe in gods as there is no evidence". Science looks for naturalistic explanations for everything.

As for probability:
Without knowing the actual odds, you have a 50/50 chance of guessing correctly if there are only two options. But that doesn't translate into a 50% chance of it being correct. For example, if I have a box with 8 blue marbles and 12 red ones, you have a 50% chance of guessing which marble will be selected next if you don't know how many of each there are. However, the actual odds are 60/40 in favour of red.

点击展开...

Lately I've seen too many Atheist vs Christian debates that involve an Atheist toting science as if it says "there is no God". Going with the "without God" definition of Atheist, science fits (since any sort of supernatural can't be measured/observed)....but saying that there is no God because of this lack of evidence is simply bad logic (which is what I mean by "modern Atheist"). Then again, this may be more of an issue of people mislabeling themselves. Many 'athiests' should call themselves anti-thiests or some such.

As for the probability, the marble example does not fit. If you only have two options (Some Creator/Divinity, No Creator/Divinity)....then you only have 2 options. Your example includes 20 options and is basically a straw-man argument (although I assume it was unintentional).

I'd say I fit under the most rational form of agnosticism that I've found. The closest thing I can compare it to is the "scientific doubt" that is the theoritical backbone of progressive science. Think Descartes, except I toss out all the bull about God justifying reality. The thing is, I escape the "you can't make decisions/do anything" kind of mentality.

Basically, to me....there is no known truth. All things are a statistical probability. For an over simplified example, the chances are probably 99.99 that the sun will rise tommorrow. Hence I follow that most probable chance when making decisions (that require the sun).

As to the probability of a God/Divinity/Afterlife/etc. I'm basically right on the line. I can't experience a divinity (and not have it explained by something else). I can't percieve either. I can't rationally conclude that there is most likely a divine being. So I have a 50/50 chance of there being a God and not....so I just withhold judgement on that.

(Oh, and on a kind of flaming tangent...I think any athiest that thinks that the modern definition of athiesm (there is no God) is the only scientific conclusion has their head so far up their egotistical ass that they can smell the hot air coming out of their mouth. Same for any religion trying to claim ownership of science.) 

It was better than the average episode. The part where the church people rush into the bar and the people in the bar rush into the church left me laughing for a few minutes.

All in all, if you are willing to watch Transformers....the Simpsons movie shouldn't be a problem. Action movies based off of superheros/cartoons/etc are typically just poorly done.

Firefly owns every new StarTrek series, as well as holds its own against the Star Wars epics, IMO. Each character is perfectly made (and in perfect combination with the others), and the setting is perfect. There just isn't a series (to me) that is as well layed out.

As to Whedon's other stuff....it can suck my left nut (the right nut is too privileged to be sucked by the likes of Buffy and Angel).

As to best character, I'd say my favorite would be either Mal or Jayne. Each are predominantly bad-ass, but with splashes of comedic relief in almost every episode.

arbites_augmented 说:

what gives you more pleasure than throwing a dead baby off a cliff?
Trying to catch it in a blender.

Can we do one more? PLEASE?

点击展开...

Hmmm...fine fine...but people need to be careful not to get too repetitious (although that is hard with dead baby jokes).

For the sake of discussion, does anyone know of a genre of jokes that are more disturbing/controversial than dead baby jokes?

Kobrag 说:

I kinda like TIK, He has a  childish sense of morality

点击展开...

Hmmm, Kobrag and TIK joining forces....

All we need is a even more attention seeking spammer, and we'll have this forum's first "hated spammer trifecta".

Naridill 说:

How would you inherit Hugh Hefner?

点击展开...

By killing whoever owns Hugh Hefner, and re-writing their will so that I come into possession of Hugh Hefner. 

How would you impregnate every woman on the planet within 24 hours?

Kissaki 说:

Freebird 说:

It's not going to work. There will always be spam and this is also guess what: spam. You say you're trying to help minimize spam, but then you go and make a topic like this. It's hypocritical. I also find it funny that it almost the only thread that you say doesn't need to be locked because it's gone off topic. You're not an admin, stop trying to be one.

点击展开...

I think he means he's sick and tired of catching flames everywhere, and would rather have them confined to this thread so he could have a normal read-through of other threads, like the rest of us. I don't see any admin-wannabe behaviour in this.

点击展开...

The ironic thing is that by creating a hate-thread, he's made people notice him. Now it is likely that a handful of people feel disinclined to actually talk to TIK, but would honestly rather flame him in any thread for creating this thread.

I'd say this thread is a type of reverse psychology: "Don't flame me, I command you=Flame me long and hard". Either that or a lack of understanding about human nature.

Lamjose 说:

He spams alot, but what really annoys me is that he refuses to use quote tags. Makes his posts hard to read.

点击展开...

I voted annoying because of that. I get confused when he quotes multiple people.

Octapi (sp?). The videos of Japanese families eating them live freaks even ME out.

Sir. Velmu 说:

Hah, Morgoth! I think we have found your long lost twin

点击展开...

Morgoth may need to sleep with one eye open now. We all know what happens with Kobrag finds family. )

Yoshiboy 说:

Too much resource hogging. Plus starting classes are way unbalanced.

点击展开...

Starting classes suck. You start the game, have no idea whats going on...so you almost always randomly roll "working class". The problem is, you don't see the stats about the class untill maybe a third of the way into the game. Alot of people restart, but its hard to just end the game after going through the long ass tutorial.

I probably should have restarted and hoped for a good re-roll. I'd like something like "Rich" to start the game with...but no, I pick the skeptic alignment and the cynic's multiplier. Piss poor choice, for future reference.

Oh, and the worst part <spoiler> You CAN'T beat it. You always die in the end. Worst ****ing endings no matter what your choices.